Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

................................................of course im going to get all the hardware mods done first.
:) WHY?

An aftermarket ecu does wonders to a std engine and turbo set-up.

My personal order:

- exhaust

- fmic

- boost increase

- ecu

- fuel pump, injectors, afm, turbo (most expensive step)

- if making over 220rwkw, replace std airbox with a CAI system

- cams (optional)

- head porting (optional)

- rebuild bottom end (once excessive blow-by occurs)

The above is just power progression list. Before the turbo make sure you upgrade clutch, BRAKES (good pads, slotted rotors, TOP SHELF FLUID!), suspension (not just coil overs), wheels and tyres. These will make your car drive faster and safer, and allow you to have a whole lot more fun in a controlled manner. Big power without these mods will NOT give you a fast car, unless you only want to drive in a straight line :)

Just my 2c

You cannot remap R34 ECUs. So just save and get a power-FC.

Only R32 GTSt ecu's can be remapped.

Um I think they can given that Dr. Drift said he could. There are also options like the biki rom that allows u to remap via USB and the software (cheaper than power FC) and the Grid daughter boards.

But yes, I think Power FC is the safest option in that its commonly tuned.

Damien

hi,

my 2 cents follows.

any ecu is remappable, well almost any. it just comes down to how much its going to cost. dr drift could remap your microwave if you like. r32 is easy remap. r33 is expensive remap. r34 is easy (apparently) remap. by expensive its that the cpu is a burn once and the board doesnt support a reburnable chip so you have to make the ecu boot from some other cpu on an expansion board (im pretty sure thats right) and then burn once a map.

in the case of the r33 its just easier and cheaper to get a powerfc. a remap for an r33 gtst could end up costing you 1200 odd easily. so its not worth it.

it doesnt matter what ecu you have, if you have motec, autronic, apexi, stocker, hell a nintendo gameboy. sure each has their own quirks and bugs and featureset but they all achieve the same goal. it really comes down to how well its tuned. if you were to compare a pfc tuned by XYZ workshop for $500 then compare it to an r32 remap by dr drift. if the remap has more load points adjusted (tuned) then it will be better, perform better and be a better car to drive. it all comes down to the tune. its fine to have XYZ ecu but if its not tuned accordingly then its pointless

  • 1 month later...

R34 Remap is $660 + dyno time, and is better than a Power FC...

Why??

- Retains Full Diagnostics through Consult Interface

- Retains Full Datalogging through Consult Interface

- Full knock sensor feedback

- Rapid and accurate closed loop feedback control (good mileage)

- Virtually Undetectable

- Less Expensive than PFC

- Proven to Pass EPA Test (vic) even with bigger turbo's and injectors etc

- Can be returned to standard in under 5 mins

R34 Remap is $660 + dyno time, and is better than a Power FC...

Why??

- Retains Full Diagnostics through Consult Interface

- Retains Full Datalogging through Consult Interface

- Full knock sensor feedback

- Rapid and accurate closed loop feedback control (good mileage)

- Virtually Undetectable

- Less Expensive than PFC

- Proven to Pass EPA Test (vic) even with bigger turbo's and injectors etc

- Can be returned to standard in under 5 mins

Questions then:

1) how does the tune cope with changing weather conditions, ie. if tuned in winter, is a retuned needed for summer? Or are conditions irrelevant?

2) If we need to return it to standard, does that involve a remap by you or is this something we can easily do?

3) Why does your tune pass EPA and a PFC tune not if they were to produce the same power on the same car?

R34 Remap is $660 + dyno time, and is better than a Power FC...

Why??

1 Retains Full Diagnostics through Consult Interface

2 Retains Full Datalogging through Consult Interface

3 Full knock sensor feedback

4 Rapid and accurate closed loop feedback control (good mileage)

5 Virtually Undetectable

6 Less Expensive than PFC

7 Proven to Pass EPA Test (vic) even with bigger turbo's and injectors etc

8 Can be returned to standard in under 5 mins

I would like to put forward an alternative view;

1. Retains Full Diagnostics through Consult Interface

But I find the Commander display a better diagnostic tool, with multiple views. Plus I don’t have to buy a Consult reader and/or display

2. Retains Full Datalogging through Consult Interface

So does PFC with Datalogit

3. Full knock sensor feedback

Commander shows knock levels on the display in real time, plus it has adjustable dash light flash warning levels

4. Rapid and accurate closed loop feedback control (good mileage)

So does the PFC

5. Virtually Undetectable

I guess if someone wants to go to the trouble of pulling the kick panel off and seeing a PFC they will just as likely spend 2 minutes more and check for the chipped ECU

6. Less Expensive than PFC

Only the first time it needs tuning, every time thereafter the PFC is cheaper. Plus you have a choice of tuners with a PFC.

7. Proven to Pass EPA Test (vic) even with bigger turbo's and injectors etc

I have had 4 cars pass NSW EPA with PFC’s, it’s all in the tuning, not the hardware.

8. Can be returned to standard in under 5 mins

Swapping from PFC to standard ECU takes about the same. Plus you can sell the PFC for almost what you paid for it, try that with a chip. PFC’s are THE most popular ECU for Skylines, there is always a market for them.

If I had an R34GTT auto the good Dr would be getting a call, but for a manual, a PFC is my choice.

:3some: Cheers :)

Edited by Sydneykid
Questions then:

1) how does the tune cope with changing weather conditions, ie. if tuned in winter, is a retuned needed for summer? Or are conditions irrelevant?

2) If we need to return it to standard, does that involve a remap by you or is this something we can easily do?

3) Why does your tune pass EPA and a PFC tune not if they were to produce the same power on the same car?

1 - Same as a Power FC (but better), the way a hotwire AFM works is an output based on air temp x air flow = air mass (hence the correct name Mass Air Flow Meter)

2 - To return to standard just move one small jumper connection inside ECU, to remove board is a bit harder.

3 - EPA (vic) does closed loop testing through the factory consult port, which still works with remap but not with power fc or any other aftermarket ecu.

where can i get my r34 gtt ecu remapped lol?im here in sydney

I already make frequent trips to sydney, e-mail me if you want to try work something out?

Sydneykid - some valid points, apart from the tuning costs, I charge the same regardless of ecu. You also mentioned not having to buy a consult reader (AUD$130) but then mention you need a Dataloggit (AUD$465), which even then cannot do some functions such as power balance testing (dropping out one cylinder at a time), simulate water temp corrections, selectable AAC position, all of which are useless as far as a driving point of view goes, but with some of these cars getting past 15 years old now it makes diagnostics and testing so much easier. We are also now selling real time tuning packages to several workshops, all over the country, which chould be up on line in a matter of months...

Edited by Dr_Drift

I guess the other thing is, it is a pain to get the car retuned if there are more mods done to the car, we'd have to wait for you to come to Sydney again.

Quite frankly, if it did need a retune, I would only want you to work on it as opposed to some other workshop who is still green to the idea of ECu tuning. Whereas there are a few reputable workshops who Id trust and go to in order to get a PFC retuned.

1 - Same as a Power FC (but better), the way a hotwire AFM works is an output based on air temp x air flow = air mass (hence the correct name Mass Air Flow Meter)

2 - To return to standard just move one small jumper connection inside ECU, to remove board is a bit harder.

3 - EPA (vic) does closed loop testing through the factory consult port, which still works with remap but not with power fc or any other aftermarket ecu.

I already make frequent trips to sydney, e-mail me if you want to try work something out?

Sydneykid - some valid points, apart from the tuning costs, I charge the same regardless of ecu. You also mentioned not having to buy a consult reader (AUD$130) but then mention you need a Dataloggit (AUD$465), which even then cannot do some functions such as power balance testing (dropping out one cylinder at a time), simulate water temp corrections, selectable AAC position, all of which are useless as far as a driving point of view goes, but with some of these cars getting past 15 years old now it makes diagnostics and testing so much easier. We are also now selling real time tuning packages to several workshops, all over the country, which chould be up on line in a matter of months...

A little off topic here sorry but have you got any further in regards to remapping a R33 Sam? In you opinion will it ever be a cost effective option? or are we better off with the PFC

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...