Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey folks,

I have done a bit of googling and dug around the site a bit and found some great information, however I'm specifically looking for details of GRP A spec GT-R's (either 32 33 or 34) as a preliminary to rebuilding my car.

Dont get me wrong, my car is clean and steetable, my plan was for my GTR to haul my carcass around daily for a few years before I join the 911 club, sure flame away if you wish, the point is I'll keep my skyline and rebuild it to some form of GRP A'ish specifications for tarmac rally and track use.

I'd like to keep the car regestered if possible (maybe a long shot) but the car will likely not see road use again, altho I would like it to be possible to bring it back to road leagal if required, so not an all out seam welded stripped out monster :D

I have worked as a fitter and turner in the motorsport field when I was younger and have a workshop at my disposal so some of the build I will be able to do myself.

the car may not come off the road for another 18-24 months yet, but it will ease the finantial pain of it all to be well prepared and have a plan on where I end up with the car. obviously it will need to meet CAMS regulations (which class's I have NFI at the moment)

So I ask of you any links, files or the like of GTR specifications for GRP A or similar class you may be able to help with. Indeed any words of wisdom or advise reguarding my plans as it isnt the usual GTR mod path.

any help or advise greatly appreciated

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/128408-looking-for-gtr-group-a-specs/
Share on other sites

Just remember that the Group A cars are now over 16 years old...and terchnology has come a long way since then. Also, the Group A cars were built in line with rules and regulations...it doesnt sound like your car will be built to a class so you wont be limited by the mods the Grp A cars ran.

Mod away to your heart is content. Oh, and maybe consider buying a not so neat example if you are ust going to turn it into a weekend race car...no point wasting a good daily driver.

Have a look in the motorsport section there are some good threads about building a circuit GTR and regulations for gtr racing.

If CAMS is a priority for you there are only 2 classes a GTR is eligible for.

3e - production - standard cars, no mods except suspension and ecu. I have a 3e race car. no 3e series in Vic

3J - improved production - allow quite a few freedoms but the big issue is all turbo cars have to run restrictors. there is 1 3j GTR in NSW which has had some success with a lot of development, but it has a very hard time against the RX7s (much lighter and similar power)

well the grp A specs was just as much for a good read as ideas to implement with my build, I cirtainly wont be using dated technology.

now Duncan has me pondering what to do about CAMS...

hmmm

perhaps I'll forget about CAMS and just build it and let scrutineers decide on which class it falls into for events such as targa tassie and the dutton rally which i'm more interested in than season racing.

that said grp A is where the gtr came from so it makes sence to use the specs as a reference.

cheers

Doesn't the old Gibson Racing Team Engineer (some guy with a german sounding name) now run his own Performance Shop in Melbourne (Hyperdrive, Hypertec, Hypersomething....??)

I am certain he would know about the Group A specs.

That's Eric (forgot how to spell his surname), he used to work at Hypertech, now he's working at Kamikaze motors from what somebody posted on this forum. I could be wrong but never hurt to search this forum for posts.

well the grp A specs was just as much for a good read as ideas to implement with my build, I cirtainly wont be using dated technology.

now Duncan has me pondering what to do about CAMS...

hmmm

perhaps I'll forget about CAMS and just build it and let scrutineers decide on which class it falls into for events such as targa tassie and the dutton rally which i'm more interested in than season racing.

that said grp A is where the gtr came from so it makes sence to use the specs as a reference.

cheers

my advice, decide what you are going to do with the car first. Second, read the rules for that over and over again until you understand them and know them inside out, before you pick up the spanners.

you obviously need to be registered for Targa or Dutton rallies. Targa has strict rules on mods for modern competition, whereas Dutton is a "run-what-you-brung" sort of affair, but very expensive for a multi day Touring Road Event.

my advice, decide what you are going to do with the car first. Second, read the rules for that over and over again until you understand them and know them inside out, before you pick up the spanners.

you obviously need to be registered for Targa or Dutton rallies. Targa has strict rules on mods for modern competition, whereas Dutton is a "run-what-you-brung" sort of affair, but very expensive for a multi day Touring Road Event.

yes I cirtainly will be very carefull before doing anything major, my idea for the car is to enhance it in the spirit of the type of racing the GTR was designed for rathur than rice it up with bolt on mods

As I have a workshop available and having worked for hollinger and modena engineering in the past I plan to make quite a few of the parts myself.

That said I'm giving myself plenty of time before I actully do anything, and am considering doing a r32 gtst drift car in the interim to learn my way around the car before getting serious with the GTR, and because the spares I have left over can go into the gtst.

just need to work out how to justify a hoist to the tax man :woot:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you really don't want to touch anything you can try to trigger off the timing loop just to see if it's sparking semi-regularly. Don't trust it for actual timing measurements.
    • Also replace the fuel filter aswell today
    • Hey everyone, I have a r34 GTT s1, im having a problem with my skyline, ive let the car sit in the garage for the last couple of months and havent run it and ive gone to fire her up today and it cranks but doesnt fire, i have been having problems with it previously where it wouldnt start again after driving it around for a bit. It use to start fine on cold start ups but if you drove to the petrol station and fueled it up and went to go start it again, it would just crank and not fire untill you let it rest for a few hours, the car doesn't over heat it sits perfectly in the middle while driving when warmed up. Im thinking this problem has caught up maybe and now it just wont start at all. The car runs on e85, ive checked the e85 seems to be fine. I can hear the fuel priming before you go to start it and checked all my fuses and relays. List of things I replaced today - New battery - New sparkplugs - New Coolant temp sensor I was thinking about testing the CAS but from what ive seen online, if the CAS is cooked, the car will actually start up but then die instantly? as mine just doesn't fire at all. Does anyone have any idea or have encountered the same problems? thanks
    • Modern reg stuff now, they'd have a wide input range which would push through a buck converter, it would need to be able to maintain voltage for cranking conditions (sub 9V at times). Likely runs something like an internal 6V rail, and then further voltage regulators depending on which circuit/area it is feeding. Modern voltage regs, like what I'm starting a new power supply design with at work, will let me run a 5V rail output, and as long as my input is equal to or greater than 5V, I have a 5V output. Except I'm not pushing a 5V rail in our system as I don't need one, we're setting up for a 3.8V rail. Our new design will allow me 6 to 60VDC input, and everything else doesn't care, even when I start pushing a few Amp outputs.   Realistically, the voltage drop off could be caused by a few things though, one could be literally the alternator is dieing, and hence charge power is dropping, which also means on a straight hard pull you're starting to send the battery flat... (Not that likely from a single couple of gear pull if the battery was fully charged). However, having earth issues, like stray earths not connected, or someone having put a ground loop in, will see the ECU appear to end up with lower voltage "input", mainly because the "ground" is no longer equivalent to battery negative. If they're comparing the input voltage using sensory ground for example, and sensor ground is what is in that ground loop, than the sensor output voltage will actually start to be reduced, when compared to battery ground... Yeah, ground wiring design can start to be a bitch... Also voltage going weird from inductive loads not being managed properly is another real bitch... Hence, why I asked above about how everything was wired in. If OP knows, and can post all of the actual connections from the ECU pin out, as well as what wires are joined where in the loom, which grounds from the ECU have ground points and where they are etc. Would help to see if there is a ground issue. The part I'd start with though, is putting a mechanical oil pressure gauge on to confirm the theory. Otherwise the next track day when the threshold is lowered could result in another of @Duncan favourite types of jokes... Knock knocks... Pretty sure this is what @GTSBoy is also self high fiving...  Is all great that we have a decent theory... But they need to prove it before relying on it...  
    • When I worked at BlueScope Steel, we had an Ethernet network, with every switch setup with a duplicate switch. Even when looking at all the primary switches, they had duplicate links, there was then also duplicated links between the primary in section A, to the duplicate in section B. So for each location that had networking, there was 8 network links. This was all back around 2007. That setup caused sooooo many issues, as many of those links were fibre. The network guys ran everything with Spanning Tree Protocol. And then we had great joy... The FOC Transceivers were slowly dieing, but in an intermittent way. And a lot of the time as they started to die, they'd drop offline for about 30 seconds... Spanning Tree Protocol was requiring 45 seconds to "rewire" the network... And by the time it was mostly finished, it had to start again as the transceiver was back online... Queue entire production network being constantly spammed with the spanning tree protocol messages...   My god I do NOT miss working in huge environments like that!
×
×
  • Create New...