Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Also, can anyone lend their assurances that the FAST printout correlates with the compliance/build plate pictures of an R32 I'm looking to buy. Does that compliance plate indicate that it was imported in 2002? And FAST states a gun-metal build colour?

post-72160-1271834723_thumb.png

post-72160-1271834976_thumb.jpg

Also, can anyone lend their assurances that the FAST printout correlates with the compliance/build plate pictures of an R32 I'm looking to buy. Does that compliance plate indicate that it was imported in 2002? And FAST states a gun-metal build colour?

post-72160-1271834723_thumb.png

post-72160-1271834976_thumb.jpg

Guy

no one will give you assurances on what is stolen software, this is nissans internal program, and while fairly accurate it DOES contain SOME SMALL faults.

while FAST wiil give details on a cars options (paint color, ABS, A_LSD, etc) it is mainly for looking up part numbers, therefore should not be relied on souley

as for compliance plates, Blue = orig nissan plate (note the 6U9000 is missing..) green is the australian import plate

given FAST and nissans plate list the same paint color, I'd guess thats the original color

Car passed compliance 08/2002 (Green Plate) and therefore was imported before this date (usually only weeks B4 but could have been anytime)

cheers

im trying to get a full list of options which came on my car

could someone check

ECR33105178

please :happy:

Anf

sorry man only lists ABS and a lot of jap my pc cand handle

post-68505-1271914597_thumb.jpg

you might have betta luck HERE

cheers Bundy

Cheers mate, I understands what your saying, I probably should has used another world rather than "assured", I was merely looking to confirm I was using the software correctly. It could come in handy later if I end owning the car (provided the StateRoads inspection goes well :D), the fact that the plates and the read-out correlate is a bonus.

Hi guys, would you be able to check these 2 VIN numbers

1. 1995 R33 GTR V-Spec - 6U900BCNR33005989

2. R32 GTR - 6U9000BNR32002902

I am looking at purchasing either of these vehicles so I want to confirm they are both GTR's and what factory options the vehicles came with etc.

Cheers for the help!

Jace

Hi guys, would you be able to check these 2 VIN numbers

1. 1995 R33 GTR V-Spec - 6U900BCNR33005989

2. R32 GTR - 6U9000BNR32002902

I am looking at purchasing either of these vehicles so I want to confirm they are both GTR's and what factory options the vehicles came with etc.

Cheers for the help!

Jace

post-20486-1272522002_thumb.jpg

post-20486-1272522029_thumb.jpg

There you go pal.

I remember finding a good page that had the meaning of all the codes. I will try and find it and post it up.

Here's the VIN # for the Midnight Purple R33 GTR V-Spec 1996.

6R91MPORTWH2R1001.

I know this seems like a strange VIN #, however where I work we record all VIN #'s, and this is what is on our records for an immaculate R33 GTR I'm considering buying. My assumption is that this VIN # was issued by South Australian Licensing Authorities (that's where it was imported to).

Would be appreciated if you could check it for me!

Cheers,

Jace.

Could i get this VIN number checked please - 6U9000BCNR33024253.

I gave you the Australian VIN number for this car in my last post, which you advised would not be recorded as it is not a genuine Nissan VIN.

The genuine Nissan VIN is BCNR33024253, however I placed "6U9000" before it.

Hopefully it is recorded on the fast software, and it should be a 1996 R33 GTR V-Spec Midnight Purple.

Cheers!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...