Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  anik3t said:
ECR33106076

post-24887-1197416134_thumb.jpg

Model: R33

Series: GTST Type M

Built: March 1996

Colour: Sonic Silver

Body: Coupe

Transmission: 5 speed manual

  SigMunky said:
BNR32310496

post-24887-1197416146_thumb.jpg

Model: R32

Series: GTR

Built: June 1994

Colour: Crystal White

Body: Coupe

Transmission: 5 speed manual

  • 4 weeks later...
  Quote
hey could some one fast this one:

6u900HNR32036476

Attached.

  cogdog said:
any info on this would be awesome as i don't know what model it is. thanks

vin. nm35303200

Still don't know how to run stagea vins, if you could tell me which part is "VIN" and which part is "CODE" in FAST I can do it :cool:

eg. HNR32 - 036476 works

But I can't do NM35-303200

OR NM353-0200 Or any other combination I tried.

  Quote
Yo does this work with engine numbers, or is there a program that does it? I want to know whether my car has a r33 engine or 32 engine in it.. thx

I don't know how to use it for engine numbers, so can't help you either :P

post-13527-1200472733_thumb.png

  some_cs_student said:
Attached.

Still don't know how to run stagea vins, if you could tell me which part is "VIN" and which part is "CODE" in FAST I can do it :)

eg. HNR32 - 036476 works

But I can't do NM35-303200

OR NM353-0200 Or any other combination I tried.

I don't know how to use it for engine numbers, so can't help you either :D

thanks for trying my stagea. i don't know which bit is VIN and which is CODE either but thanks for trying. i'll try and find out and i might try it another time

  Duncan said:
the vin is NM35-303200, but the copy of fast that is getting around only covered models up to 2000ish. We need someone with the addtional data cds.....

thanks Duncan

i'll write that down and hopefully if someone gets an updated version they can help me then.

  Duncan said:
the vin is NM35-303200, but the copy of fast that is getting around only covered models up to 2000ish. We need someone with the addtional data cds.....

I think I have found a site that has "CD2 09 2006" which I hope will have the information to cover the NM35. I will try to get it tonight and see if I can get the data to cover our cars.

  • 2 weeks later...
  TommO said:
Hi all,

Any chance someone could fast this VIN for me please?? :rolleyes:

BCNR33040532

Just want to confirm that it's not a V-Spec...

Cheers!!

Tommo

Hi Tommo

I have attached the FAST info.

Cheers

Andy

post-41854-1202039503_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...