Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

230rwkw is plenty for a street car which is daily driver but if you can get more with the right turbo setup that would be even better. Also, considering it's an auto I prefer nice and early spool over full boost high in the rev range.

Any one got a "recipe" what needs to be done to the 25de to handle the power apart from the valve springs. What can you reuse from the rb20det and the rb25de?

Would you end up with 2.5l capacity or can you also use gtr crank and rods with different pistons and change the capacity?

Edited by nedb
230rwkw is plenty for a street car which is daily driver but if you can get more with the right turbo setup that would be even better. Also, considering it's an auto I prefer nice and early spool over full boost high in the rev range.

Any one got a "recipe" what needs to be done to the 25de to handle the power apart from the valve springs. What can you reuse from the rb20det and the rb25de?

Would you end up with 2.5l capacity or can you also use gtr crank and rods with different pistons and change the capacity?

I'm still in the rebuild process.

Rb26 rods with arp rodbolts and head studs are good insurance.

I found a 2nd hand rb26 crank and had the oilpump collar done but the capacity increase (70cc) is minimal for the cost.

The capacity with an rb26 crank will be the same as an rb26 with std bore 2568cc.

You need rb26 pistons as the pin height is different even though the bores are both 86mm

I'm using 87mm rb26 wisecos and the capacity will be 2628cc.

The r32 rb25de is just an rb20de with a longer stroke, bigger bore, bigger valves, inlet ports and runners.

Everything else is interchangeable.

I decided to use an r33 rb25det block so I could keep the piston oil squirters although it's not essential.

I'm sure many will agree with me..

220-230rwkw is actually not that fast... 250rwkw+ is whats needed.

The R32 Rb25de will be fine. Be sure to change the valve springs. :D

No doubt new valve springs are a good idea but are the std rb25de valvesprings weaker that rb20det valvesprings?

In the r32 manual they are rated as having the same seat pressure as the rb26 at 24kg at installed height.

No doubt new valve springs are a good idea but are the std rb25de valvesprings weaker that rb20det valvesprings?

In the r32 manual they are rated as having the same seat pressure as the rb26 at 24kg at installed height.

Seat pressure is only one measurement. There's also open pressure.

The RB20det valve springs are the same as the r32 rb25de, the big factor here is the rb25de runs larger valves so more difficult for the valve springs to control, in n/a they are fine, push a bit of boost and exh. back pressure in to the equation that places pressure on the back of the valve to hold it open and this is where you begin to run in to trouble.

Read around half way down of the following doc. http://www.cranecams.com/?show=faq&id=5

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Got the motor out and torn down. I'll be dropping off the block Monday. Luckily the scoring on Cyl6 is much less pronounced then the pictures made it out to seem. It can barely be felt. If you pass your finger over it 10x you'll barely notice it. Hopefully by some chance it will only require a honing. I'm not in the mood to buy one size larger pistons or another block. Oddly enough my 6th cylinder with the scoring has extremely clean intake valves compared to my other 5 cylinders. I'm worried the scoring was caused by too much fuel or Water/Methanol washing the cylinder. I'll review some old logs to confirm.  This was also the first time I pull an engine with the transmission still attached. It went much better then expected. I was worried my CD009 wouldn't make it easy due to its sheer size but it was much easier this way. 
    • From the pictures I have when doing the job the flywheel is the same diameter, I don't think they're playing weird tricks like putting weights at the outer diameter to increase flywheel inertia or anything like that. The OEM flywheel is definitely heavier, but it's not a huge difference. Quoted weight savings of the clutch is 2 kg so I can't imagine the flywheel being lighter than ~7 kg. Kind of regret not weighing it before the clutch went into the car but as far as driveability goes I have no complaints.
    • HKS trigger kit should be very easy to integrate with a Link. It's a 36-2 crank trigger. Hard part is finding the motivation to take off the timing belt and everything on the front of the engine to install it. You also need to cut out a hole in the oil pump housing so the sensor can read the trigger wheel. Changing out the cam sensor for a 24 tooth setup is probably good enough but as others have mentioned depending on what underlying assumptions are changed it becomes more of a problem. Reading the crank state off of the cam is an abstraction that works in the general case, but if you have an edge case it makes less and less sense. There is a GTX2860 gen 2 that can take a compact 5 bolt housing so it's direct bolt on but I'm not 100% sure of what's involved. Peak compressor efficiency drops off a bit on these turbos vs -5s, 77% vs 73% but you get way, way wider region of operation. The -5s have a really strange surge line in their compressor map that is all over the place. If you think the hot side on the -5s aren't open enough you can try the Tomei T550B turbos which a local tuner seems to be happy with:
    • i need a complete tail light for my R33 GTR if you have please let me know.
    • I need a great maintenance workshop around Idaho, if you know one please let me know..
×
×
  • Create New...