Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just put a PFC on a auto r33, and it just works like the standard ecu. Gear changes and kickdown is just like before. Only thing i have done to the auto is a stage 2 valve body and a bigger trans cooler from MV AUTOS.

Wish i had done this before rather than wasting my money on different piggy back computers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/128649-another-pfc-working-on-auto-r33/
Share on other sites

hi,

my 2 cents follows. the powerfc (like most ecu's) is a manual only ecu. it does not take into account auto gearbox logic control. there is no techincal way possible that the gear shifting is identicial to the stock ecu. it doesnt have the code logic present to make it so. and even if you think and feel its all cool its putting extra stress on the auto box. im happy for you to have a powerfc, but you should be aware it is putting stress on the box. each gearchange is, as the ignition timing isn't cut.

the powerfc (like most ecu's) will certainly work, the car will drive, it will run etc but it wont take into account shift control. the powerfc should work out of the box on the auto skyline. its no different to the manual skyline (aside from the gearbox and logic control)

Lee,

their was nothing to get it working, all i did was plug it in and do the idle learn stuff.

Paul,

The gearbox logic control for the auto is handled by the auto ecu and not the engine ecu. The only thing the engine ecu does is cut back timing before a gearchange. Now cutting back timing might be a problem with the standard valve body where it tends to slip between gearchanges and generate a lot of heat, but with the upgraded valvebody the shifts are so fast, i dont think they will be a need to cut back timing.

As i said before the shifs are just as they where before, and i am happy to take u out for a quick spin to prove it. (i live in South Morang).

I spoke to the guys at "Creatd" and they said its funny how it works on some r33s and not on others.

One thing i could think of is Nissan has had 7 different ecu's for the auto from 93 to 96, and mine being a 96, maybe the newer versions are less dependent on the auto ecu than the earier ones.

Also about 3-4 years ago this dude i knew put a pfc on his car (which was a 93 r33 with just a catback and nothing else), and it felt very different. Gearchanges where very hard, it used to hold on to a gear for a lot longer and also it took ages to kickdown, so again maybe the ecu version and the standard valvebody played a part in it.

the auto gear logic is inside the ecu on nissan cars. for toyota's its in a seperate ecu, this is why there is the auto powerfc's for toyota (see the jzx100 auto chaser powerfc).

nissan

auto logic inside stock ecu

not present on most aftermarket ecu's

toyota

auto logic present inside external auto eco

a lot of ecu's work with toyota auto

Just put a PFC on a auto r33, and it just works like the standard ecu. Gear changes and kickdown is just like before. Only thing i have done to the auto is a stage 2 valve body and a bigger trans cooler from MV AUTOS.

Wish i had done this before rather than wasting my money on different piggy back computers.

Wait for a week or two, then get back to us. The more power you have the quicker you will notice.

Paul,

The gearbox logic control for the auto is handled by the auto ecu and not the engine ecu. The only thing the engine ecu does is cut back timing before a gearchange. Now cutting back timing might be a problem with the standard valve body where it tends to slip between gearchanges and generate a lot of heat, but with the upgraded valvebody the shifts are so fast, i dont think they will be a need to cut back timing.

As i said before the shifs are just as they where before, and i am happy to take u out for a quick spin to prove it. (i live in South Morang).

I spoke to the guys at "Creatd" and they said its funny how it works on some r33s and not on others.

One thing i could think of is Nissan has had 7 different ecu's for the auto from 93 to 96, and mine being a 96, maybe the newer versions are less dependent on the auto ecu than the earier ones.

Also about 3-4 years ago this dude i knew put a pfc on his car (which was a 93 r33 with just a catback and nothing else), and it felt very different. Gearchanges where very hard, it used to hold on to a gear for a lot longer and also it took ages to kickdown, so again maybe the ecu version and the standard valvebody played a part in it.

I have found ZERO difference in shift logic ignition retard and cut between models.

It doesn't "work" on all models. I have driven 10 or so Skyines autos supposedly "working" with aftermarket ECUs'. Not one of them had even remotely close to satisfactory gearchange smoothness or provided any protection for the gearbox at the time of the gearchange.

If you are going to use the Power FC to tune for any decent sort of power increase you will come to quickly realise what that means. As I said above, please keep us in the loop.

:D cheers :P

Paul,

The r33 autos have two ecus, the one on the left is the engine ecu(same place as manual) and than on the right hand kick panel is the auto ecu.

Geoff,

If u are the dude with the purple gtr around the lakes area, we have past each other a few times. Mine is the black s2. I am happy to let u take it out for a spin, car is at "Creatd" now getting a few things done, u are well come to go there and take it out for a spin.

Sydneykid,

Their are at least 2 r33's on this forum that have been using the pfc for well over a year, with the same setup as mine and roughly the same power as mine (>220rwkw)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...