Jump to content
SAU Community

Turbo compare


TTT
 Share

Recommended Posts

therb25 turbo is bogger the rb20 exhaust wheel is 42 mm the rb25 one is 48 mm the vg 30 one is 49 mm boost comes on earlier.

the rb20 turbo will make 160 rwkw the rb25 will make 180 rwkw and the vg30 turbo will make 190 rwkw.

meggala

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will a RB25 turbo bolt on to the standard RB20 housing?

will the bolts and so on line up?

Will there be any need for ECU changes?

when you say boost comes on earlier, which one are you talking about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meggala

Im running stock turbo..

And have dyno proven at least 260rwhp.... had to cancel run because fuel pump was leaning out ...

Friend of mine (GTT 25) on these forums mad 240 hp @ only 11psi.

From my experience there a bit more in them than that.

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imacu8 I wont even go there with the different dyno figures.

some people set them high some set them low.

ethan r33 made 170 rwkw on an r33 with stock turbo hks cooler exhuast etc @ around 12 13 psi thats a believe able figure

meggala

Btw I'm not say ing your car didn't make that on that that dyno its just it would read different on another dyno.

they are 300-320 hp turbos not 400

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meg's,

The dyno that Bark's (ethan_R33) car made 177rwkw on has also been used to dyno Freebaggin's GTS25t. Freebaggin's car made a tad over 200rwkw on the stock turbo (FMIC, exhaust, Microtech etc...) FB's Microtech was tweaked again (later on) due to pinging issues (i think?) This resulted in mid 190's. This is the same dyno my car has made its last few rwkw figures on.

Ethan_R33's car made 149rwkw before the S-AFC was tuned, & 177rwkw after it was tuned (the timing was advanced too).

A totally standard GTS25t makes ~128rwkw on the dyno in question (from the owners mouth).

Matt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim I thought your car was a sh1t hot stinker when you got it.

I could be wrong ,

a good up grade is ethier a t3/4, t4, gt25 series, hks 2835 hks 3040,td06,td07n apex ax 6 (I think its called) and a t88 and yes they do fit. and about a dozen moreIt all depends on what you want.

meggala

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Megg's it is :O Just looking over my options, whats the biggest, baddest, bolt-on, muther of a turbo that I could grab for a reasonable price then :P

I'll be taking pictures of my rides internals soon to try and get some help to discover exactly what everything is :O

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know what I would be looking at paying for a turbo off a RB25?

Hey JiMbO..

You live in Ashfiled.. (going by your profile..)

I live in Ashbury...

How r ya neighbour...

hahahahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed :P /me looks over the fence to eye off the other Sky's :) Which way is Ashbury from Ashfield ? :D I'm originally from the coast and only moved recently so my knowledge of Sydney suburbs isn't that great yet ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I would go cut bellhousing over that monstrosity of a flywheel all day, every day. It puts a lot more mass further from the last main bearing. I've had nothing but problems with Collins in the past and refuse to ever buy their products again. I would not trust anything they tell you. He's playing his salesman card.  I'm currently at 640whp on a mustang dyno (~770bhp) with the intentions of running E85 and a lot more power this upcoming spring. Cheers, 
    • Nah, it's not the reduced knock margin. It is a direct mechanical effect of having to initiate the combustion earlier, while the piston is still rising, which starts to exert combustion pressure on the rising piston earlier, making the rest of the engine work harder to finish driving the piston up to TDC where the combustion pressure stops being a negative and starts being a positive. Your modern engine that only needs ~10° to make MBT doesn't waste the other 10 or so degrees of crank rotation. That's almost all of it. The difference in knock margin might go either way. Remember that modern engines to which you are currently comparing the long tractor engine (the RB) are now running super high compression, direct injection, tricky cam control and maybe even cylinder pressure sensors. You're not comparing apples with other fruit. It's apples and sea weed, or some other evolutionarily primitive vegetation. And remember, squish only really comes into play at the very end of the stroke. It certainly does good things, but it is not the biggest contributor to what's going on. It is quite possibly much less important in 4 valve head than 2 valvers also, because there is so much less squish available to a 4 valve anyway.
    • Food for thought, a longer stroke motor would need less ignition timing vs. a shorter stroke motor requiring more ignition timing.
    • Thanks Duncan, HART is only 10 mins from me (I did my bike license there), it'd be awesome if it ran these types of things.  Sutton Road does look good and they take fewer cars than SMSP which is good.  Surely you have enough land to lay a few million tonnes of concrete and some sprinklers D? 
    • I thought an engine that needs more ignition timing to make power is going to result in less power due to reduced knock margin? More time for the combustion to propagate -> more time for it to heat up the rest of the mix to detonation.
×
×
  • Create New...