Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Weighty steering isnt a bad thing, I prefer it :O

Kushil Abeysinghe,

We dont see much of Germany, we just drop in through Belgium then a quick blast and we are at the Ring. No autobahns on the way :O

http://www.multimap.com/map/aproute.cgi?cl...e_pan〈=

We have been tot he Ring twice before, both times in an XJR Jag. Great car and a lot of fun but Im really looking forward to taking the Skyline, it whould be pretty mind blowing in comparison to the Jag :)

We have been having overheating issues with the Skyline despite fitting a Greddy rad and 19 row oil cooler so we are now halfway through fitting a 34 row cooler right in the mouth of the bumper. Ill be bolloxed if the cars going to overheat with this thing fitted! Ill get some pics when its in later today, it should look really cool. And of course work well :(

There was a thread on overheating / radiators / cooling system issues that was active a little while ago. If you still have overheating problems, perhaps you should dig it up. Synopsis seems to be a high swirl pot will help (and remove any air traps, etc)...

good luck. And on the hicas, try unplugging the ecu and taking it for a fang somewhere you can. The hicas should disable itself automatically, and you will have an indication (and no power steering for the duration of the test) of how much the active hicas works. When disabled, it should lock itself straight (If not, there are enough people who should know who have replied to this thread).

We then take the car to the track or get it loose during some spirited driving and the HICAS gives us understeer into a corner, so the driver turns in harder and eventually some oversteer may occur. The driver then corrects oversteer by turning on some opposite steering and the HICAS follows pulling more oversteer into the equation. We now enter tankslapper phenomena and this is exacerbated by the useless viscous LSD in 33's which are easily overpowered once hot. As the inexperienced driver tries to correct and stay on the gas to keep going the car becomes more unstable as the HICAS keeps dragging the rear about, eventually going around and all to often hitting a wall at the track.

I'll preface this by saying I've not driven a HICAS-equipped car on the track and every post I read seems to have a different opinion of how it works, but if the HICAS is acting to help turnin (ie opposite turn to front wheels, oversteer) I can see how the tank-slapper happens. If it's acting to create understeer (same direction as front wheels) this should actually help pull the car out of a slide.

I've heard claims of R32 GTRs basically throwing people into the sand trap because of HICAS, so maybe what you're saying about the 32GTR being more rear dominant is true (yet, it MUST be quicker.. otherwise why would they do it that way?).

Which leaves me with my S2 GTS-t, I think I'll be leaving HICAS alone if it makes the car feel more stable when you're doing "80%" driving.. because I'm sure as shit not going harder than that on the road!!

You have to remind yourself just how many things put into cars are just gimmicks for marketing. Back then 4WS was the big gimmick on Japanese cars. We know it was a gimmick because it's almost completely gone. I used to operate 20ton 4WD 4WS cross country cranes which can counter and crab steer, as well as reverse the steering input if the boom is over the back. Not a gimmick for getting that big sucker through tight areas but in cars....useless.

I've driven a number of different types of race cars from rally, formula ford and sports sedans as well as R32/R33 GTSt/GTR and front wheel drives with and without 4WS. I can honestly state that I can feel the rear moving about in the Skylines with HICAS and I prefer the natural and progressive consistency of the rear being straight, without input from a rear rack at speed. Low speed 4WS makes no difference as it's for parking.

The big thing is though that not everyone pushes it hard enough or has the feedback sensitivity to warrant a change, but that comes through experience. If it works fine and you don't feel it impact then leave it alone.

The way HICAS pulls the car around is after you lose rear traction. It works in phase with the steering input, so once you wind on some opposite lock it turns the rear wheels in the same direction which tries to pull the tail out. It only turns a bit so unless you can be pretty quick on the wheel it goes threough a transition stage then stops at 1deg so you can be constantly correcting for it, especially if you are in second gear with the rear loose and right on the threshold of the HICAS activation speed of around 80kmh.

There are other things that help to destabilise the rear end as well like the subframe bushes which I could feel squirming around during turn in, but they also are easily fixed.

Part of the drama of owning an ageing car is the need, especially if you go to the track, is constantly inspecting for things that might be about to let go so going to track is a good way of motivating to keep the car tip top.

The way HICAS pulls the car around is after you lose rear traction. It works in phase with the steering input, so once you wind on some opposite lock it turns the rear wheels in the same direction which tries to pull the tail out.

Ah yes, right you are.. I wasn't thinking about it enough :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks Duncan! Yeah it's street use for me only. Maybe occasional track day. Any difference in noise when running with the two pumps? I would expect the lift pump to be more quiet than the main pump so hopefully not? And yes, unfortunately quite a big price difference to the simple hanger setup. Though I'm usually willing to trade money for better reliability and future-proofing. Buy once, cry once and all that. I'd be very happy to never have to deal with fuel pump / wiring issues again  
    • The old manifold was quite under the GTR strut brace.  The new manifold is quite [unknown] the GTR strut brace. The GTR strut brace was needed to clear the bonnet vents. The Old strut brace will almost certainly clear the new manifold, but not the bonnet vents. The old strut brace will almost certainly clear the new manifold, and the new bonnet without vents. But I am hoping the GTR strut brace clears the new manifold :p
    • On the bright side, at least you knew that it happened and remedied before anything happened. A friend of mine just took his Fiat 124 to a shop for an oil change and they didn't tighten the oil filter housing properly. 4.5 quarts spewed out and even after refilling + tightening the cap the engine has a tick now.
    • So, more pain. The FAST manifold is a little larger than the stocker. This is problematic because there really wasn't much clearance to begin with, so going from 'barely enough' well into 'no' is sad based on the external dimensions of the thing, even though where it bolts to the head is the same. Result is the fuel rails sit a good 25mm higher, and this is a bit of an issue with the wiring that runs behind the motor, and the fuel lines, and everything else. When pushing the manifold on, it required a huge amount of force to crush wiring looms to fit it, sensors like the MAP sensor are about 1mm from the firewall, and the FPR just has to bend ABS lines to be forced into place. After some brainstorming and some sad drinking, the loom for some reason ran from the grommet behind the ABS sensor, then to the driver side head, then back to the passenger side head. So all of this was pulled back and stripped, a few wires cut and rejoined, so that the 'branch' was now on the passenger side's head as below: Before you basically couldn't see anything behind the driver head. This is much improved! The MAP sensor is now pointing up (instead of at the firewall) Brackets have been made up for the rail. The rails are for a LS1, the manifold is designed around a LS2 as it's base. Which of course has slightly different bracketry and water pump clearance, hence the mods people need to do. Should be hopefully mounted tonight. I spent money on a new FPR that is slightly more compact than my Turbosmart FPR1200. The gauge has also been moved to the rail. There's also apparently an ORB to AN Union instead of the adapter, because the ~25mm of the current adapter is going to make the difference. Provided this all goes together and arrives today, it'll be the totally not stressful attempt to start it.
×
×
  • Create New...