Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As the title says, does anyone use this brand of oil, i have heard awesome things about it and im doing a change with the royal purple 10w40 tomorrow....

anyone else using it?

any thoughts on this brand?

Beef

Edited by Beef
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/129567-royal-purple-oils-your-thoughts/
Share on other sites

Beef,

I have been using Royal Purple 10W40 for a while now - ever since my last blow up. After spinning bearings my mechanic did a little research to ensure we were using the best oil available. From his feedback, a lot of the high horsepower guys are using Royal Purple because of its friction coefficient and is an ash free synthetic. Fairly expensive (especially when you have an extended sump), but so far so good.

Theres no such thing as 'ash free'. You can see this from the UOAs. Ash freemeans there are no metallic type additives in the formulation which is clearly not true.

IMO Royal Purple's street oils are OK (no evidence to suggest they are better than Mobil1 in real world testing), but their racing oils such as RP21 are quite good.

Beef,

I have been using Royal Purple 10W40 for a while now - ever since my last blow up. After spinning bearings my mechanic did a little research to ensure we were using the best oil available. From his feedback, a lot of the high horsepower guys are using Royal Purple because of its friction coefficient and is an ash free synthetic. Fairly expensive (especially when you have an extended sump), but so far so good.

The flash point for RP 10w40 are only 204'c (HTHS 4.02), the RP 15w40 flash point do look better with 224'c but (HTHS 3.6) only. IMO both not really ideal for hot running turbo engine.

The RP 10w30 do look better with flash point at 235'c and HTHS of 3.3, i would say go for the 10w30 for faster turbo spool and better thermal stability.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...