Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Not interested in changing the turbo atm, just looking to make what i have work.

I was hoping for over 300 but if its not going to get there then im thinking i may as well go back to standard.

log style manifolds are crud

try and find a hks cast low mount manifold. They look stock enough

But then all the intake and dump needs to be made again as it dosnt put the turbo in the factory location.

log style manifolds are crud

try and find a hks cast low mount manifold. They look stock enough

But lets just get back to the requirements at hand for a second…

1. Tight budget – so clearly no $1400 manifold manifold, custom piping, new dump etc

2. As factory as possible appearance

3. No more than 300rwkw

As to wether it’s the best performing setup, giving the best performance etc etc - really is not the question or issue here at all.

So who cares of its “crud”. It’s been proven to work & the stock manifold fits those requirements perfectly.

Lithium is making 300rwkw on a stock manifold with a 3076 .82 internally gated on a 200,000km motor.

Seems to work for him, and drives as smoothly as my 77,000km motor.

He had one of those exact manifolds on his for a while. I think he got it for quite cheap so tried it. Made the car sound pretty awesome, but blew the welds at the flange after a while so went back to the stock.

I think it had something to do with this:

lol

He had one of those exact manifolds on his for a while. I think he got it for quite cheap so tried it. Made the car sound pretty awesome, but blew the welds at the flange after a while so went back to the stock.

How much of a difference was there, both on paper and seat of the pants?

Seat of the pants, basically none - which actually surprised me. The most power I have made on paper was with the stock cast manifold I put back on after the stainless one failed. It SOUNDED like something more serious with the stainless manifold though, which gave an unjustified sensation of speed.

Lol all this talk about 3071/76/35r....

he wants a high flow or a 2530?

Stock manifold is fine...+ heat shields + factory EVERYTHING = you get to smile when you get asked to pop your bonnet..

ummmmmmm 2530??? where did you get that from, i have a 3540!

Lol all this talk about 3071/76/35r....

he wants a high flow or a 2530?

Stock manifold is fine...+ heat shields + factory EVERYTHING = you get to smile when you get asked to pop your bonnet..

It pays to read the whole thread, the first post was 5 years ago, i chose to bring it up again as it has relevant information and was interested to see if there has been any definitive answers gained in the 5 yrs since this was posted, its also relevant in that its the exact same manifolds being talked about today as it was 5 yrs ago when the thread was posted!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It was roughly 3.5 hours.    car went in around 11:00 and I was done around 2:30 He did the initial runs, install the BC and then Nistune install and tune.  The best part was sitting in the lobby and hearing the skyline on full throttle at the dyno 😂😂
    • Glad it all went smooth. How long did the tuning process take?
    • Yeah that was kind of the same feedback my tuner gave me.  the boost tee is until I can sort out my plan for the electronic boost controller and what I’d get, where I’d mount the dash etc.  I’m happy with this until I can figure it out. Not a big fan of the A-pillar gauges. I’d like to get a clean install of the boost gauge - something digital like GFB.  Something like that might fit neatly where the ashtray is and look clean. I feel like replacing the OEM triple gauge is a bit extreme for a weekender like my skyline. And it’s not making crazy power to need all the additional sensors/gauges. 
    • I'm about to swap my box to Tremec T56 Magnum F & initially thinking of re-using my DCS twin plate (can get it re centred for the bigger spline) but it's been called out the box will be noisy (rattle) as the clutch is unsprung.  So I'm doing as much research as possible. I'm not so worried about holding the power as I'll go the track version which on paper will hold the maybe 1000hp I make. It's the longevity I worry about. DCS told me they don't use a sprung centre as it's just something that can break. The uni clutch has a very complicated sprung centre. Any one had or heard about any issues with it failing? Thanks in advance.
    • Auto is at least 10% (from my real, actual experience with different torque converters and manual on the same setup) ~185rwkw at 11.6psi (peak!) is entirely what one would expect without a FMIC or anything else on the intake, it does bleed off towards the higher RPM so it's what, 9psi there? Note: There is nothing that can be done about this with a manual boost tee. If you want to hold it steady and gain more top end, well - You will need electronic boost control.....
×
×
  • Create New...