Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Autospeed article suggests that it's a good idea. They measured the surface area of a few standard intake ducts and snorkels, and concluded that there is a bottleneck on most systems.

The other benefit was that the second one could be ducted to an area where more cool air is available, while keeping it looking stock.

They measured the pressure loss before and after, and even at idle the pressure loss was reduced. I just can't find a good way to do it on a stock R33 setup.... without making new holes.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130339-2nd-intake-pipe/#findComment-2411860
Share on other sites

yehh thats where i saw the info aswell,

just gonna see if there is anywhere which culd pass through with less cutting and altering.......

if anyone has tried this let us know i wanna know how much of a benefit it is

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130339-2nd-intake-pipe/#findComment-2411897
Share on other sites

I just can't find a good way to do it on a stock R33 setup.... without making new holes.

same here. with the standard intercooler pipes in place, theres just no room for ducting.

but if anyone has worked out a method, i'd like to hear it. I'm using a pod, and dont have the standard snorkel happening.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130339-2nd-intake-pipe/#findComment-2411898
Share on other sites

Well i've tried an idea and im in the process of making it better.

I know u didnt wanna cut any holes but its only a fraction larger than the original hole, u could use a file...

Anyway first up i removed the stock air box and purchased a 90' silicone hose as it needed to be a tighter bend, then i bought a 90' 3" stainless piece of pipe. U could use an off cut from an exhaust shop.

Cut the hole slightly bigger and set up the silicone bend from the stock air flow meter so it bends down the hole and over the 3" 90' bend stainless.

I fed the stainess pipe up the hole and the silicone over the pipe so it didnt need to go down the hole.

Then position the stainless so its aiming foward and attach the pod filter.

This makes it positioned just under the fog lights on a series 2 front depending how long u leave the pipe, not sure about the series 1.

Problem was that the simota pod filter i have has a case around the outside. I bought it like that to help prevent stones etc bouncing up and damaging the pod filter. It worked fine .... until it rained heavly.

Problem was the rain bouncing up from the road and spraying up from other cars was collecting in the pods surrounding case. I realised as soon as i got home when i checked the pod and it was still wet. I had it positioned on an angle to prevent this but still dont feel comfortable driving in the wet like this.

Solution im adopting is removing the pod and silicone hose and leaving the stainless pipe hanging down from the hole with a polished trumpet like end that im gonna have welded to the end of it. That way in the gap under the fog light there will be a nice chrome funnel like thingie :rolleyes:

At the top side of the pipe, just inside the engine bay weld tabs to the tip of the pipe and put screws through them into the engine bay to hold it firm.

Then just fit the pod filter to the stock air flow meter as normally done and there u have it... done.

Even if the trumpet end goes under water it shouldnt matter as there is no direct suction, the air will just flow up the trumpet and be directed right at the pod filter.

Matt

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130339-2nd-intake-pipe/#findComment-2412602
Share on other sites

Nahh i done it after i got the front mount installed, had to get a pod filter put on cause the stock air box was getting air from the engine because it had to be partly removed to fit the intercooler pipe work.

Im talkin about the hole directly under the stock air box its almost 3" I bought a hole saw but in the end used a file because there was bugger all to take out.

I dont think its the hole from the stock intercooler because im pretty sure thats still being used by the new cooler piping. Just look up under the front left guard you can see the hole clearly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130339-2nd-intake-pipe/#findComment-2412879
Share on other sites

yeah it's one of the holes from the stock intercooler.

Munkyb0y, as already know we have the same front bar, if you add an intercooler you'll get a new hole under the stock airbox, ask a fabricator to route a pipe directly from this hole to the large air duct under the passenger side head light with a square to round transition so it surrounds the duct perfectly. This is what I have been planning to do for about 12 months, but keep putting it off.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130339-2nd-intake-pipe/#findComment-2414434
Share on other sites

Munkyb0y, as already know we have the same front bar, if you add an intercooler you'll get a new hole under the stock airbox, ask a fabricator to route a pipe directly from this hole to the large air duct under the passenger side head light with a square to round transition so it surrounds the duct perfectly. This is what I have been planning to do for about 12 months, but keep putting it off.

yeah i have already sussed that out, and seen pics of other sau member's ducting. seems pretty easy, especially with this front bar. but i'm still using the stock smic.

on that subject, u know when u stuff around with the intake and exhaust (pod and 3 inch), it throws the stock ecu off a bit, hence worse economy, and probably rich issues. does this get worse with the addition of a fmic?

also, i've heard ppl reporting greater lag on stock turbos with fmic, and others reporting better response.

what's ur take on this?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130339-2nd-intake-pipe/#findComment-2414894
Share on other sites

i've got a few cars now where I have an additional 3" flex pipe running from the front grille.

Typically when u install a FMIC the stock return hole is free which is directly under the filter.

I have run some pipe from the grille directly into this area...costs are minimal and the effort is low also. seems to work really well.

IMO the ipe form the grille has a bigger and less restricted air flow, if u add the stock intake then you should have plently of air avaliable.

as for FMIC and lag...if the return path is longer and the fmic is bigger then I assume you will get more lag. Also the size of the turbo contributes to this.

Since all my r33 upgrades I get more lag...but personally I don't care as for when I'm just crusing it just runs like a NA 2.5 car around the place...then I rev it a bit harder and I have a 12 second car. Personal preference I guess.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130339-2nd-intake-pipe/#findComment-2416288
Share on other sites

yeah i have already sussed that out, and seen pics of other sau member's ducting. seems pretty easy, especially with this front bar. but i'm still using the stock smic.

on that subject, u know when u stuff around with the intake and exhaust (pod and 3 inch), it throws the stock ecu off a bit, hence worse economy, and probably rich issues. does this get worse with the addition of a fmic?

also, i've heard ppl reporting greater lag on stock turbos with fmic, and others reporting better response.

what's ur take on this?

You get a bit more lag with the FMIC but you can barely notice at all even so you compensate by fitting a full turbo back exhaust with high flow cat. In my experience the exhaust improved fuel economy.

The stock ecu does get stuffed around a bit, Idle hunt and run's a bit richer (i think because of the fmic??) but on the open highway its better.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130339-2nd-intake-pipe/#findComment-2418129
Share on other sites

Well i got it completed yesterday and heres some pics. i'll post em but its the first time i've posted anything so i aint sure if it'll work

Engine bay

post-28112-1155946656.jpg

Under guard

post-28112-1155946725.jpg

Hole in air filter cover

post-28112-1155946805.jpg

Air filter over induction hole

post-28112-1155946853.jpg

Front view

post-28112-1155946904.jpg

Under the front of intercooler looking upwards

post-28112-1155946969.jpg

Finished induction pipe

post-28112-1155947162.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130339-2nd-intake-pipe/#findComment-2421824
Share on other sites

lol after seeing ur post u got me fired up to fix up mine.

Went down to this place and bought some 3" flex pipe...the black stuff with the wire in it. Ran it from the old return hole form the stock IC to the grille in the same point u have. seem tos work fine...might put some mesh over it ot something later...

cost $10. time 5min...

From the front....sleeper look - i.e. hard to see it.

post-27030-1155961515.jpg

My CAI box and pod...sorry lid hasn't been polished for a bit

post-27030-1155961528.jpg

the pipe from the stock SMIC retun hole

post-27030-1155961497.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130339-2nd-intake-pipe/#findComment-2421836
Share on other sites

series2r33 I was thinking of having the same set-up as currently my pod is unprotected in the engine bay, I was wanting to know is there performace loss do to increasing the length of the induction pipe?

mate the stock intake form the grille is kinda crap. a 3" pipe into the box makes sure there is lots of airflow.

where did u get the box for your pod filter from? was it custom made? looks sweet

from this forum...some1 made them check the GB or for sale section

the filter is a Unifilter pod for the R33....check http://www.uniflow.com.au/

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130339-2nd-intake-pipe/#findComment-2422743
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...