Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have a R32 GTS-T. Mods include full exhaust system, boost controller, coil packs, air intake and soon to be fmic and apexi fc. Just a question? Is it possible to get this baby to smoke your average R33 or R34 and even stand in the shadow of a GTR?

I've been told they have no bottom end but there must be a way to fix this? Any points of view out there. I just think that If I spend another $10000 or so on carbon bonnet, coil overs, bearing turbo, fmic and other items without knowing what its worth.

Thanks :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/130637-rb20-better-than-rb25-or-26/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

mod for mod, the 25/26 wil always beat the 20 due to its extra capacity. however there are a few highpowered RB20's arounjd the place that with a grippy set up car would more then likely blow away a stock GTR...

as for having no bottom end.. well they are only a 2 litre motor, so you either need to rev them to get power, or add capacity

either way, i love my rb20, makes great power for bugger all bucks!

dollar for dollar spent... RB20 wont ever match an RB25/RB26

Its just not going to happen. Capacity dictates much more broad power curves so more power, for longer.

The only way to be better, is to spend more, and i mean a LOT more money than the other person

Hi,

I have a R32 GTS-T. Mods include full exhaust system, boost controller, coil packs, air intake and soon to be fmic and apexi fc. Just a question? Is it possible to get this baby to smoke your average R33 or R34 and even stand in the shadow of a GTR?

I've been told they have no bottom end but there must be a way to fix this? Any points of view out there. I just think that If I spend another $10000 or so on carbon bonnet, coil overs, bearing turbo, fmic and other items without knowing what its worth.

Thanks :)

How do you mean "beat" a GTR? Can the GTR be modified aswel?

Power FC, GTR injectors and a HKS GT2530 will give you 270ish rwhp, and a well powered, reliable and responsive RB20DET. going any bigger turbo will give you excessive lag, unless u like lag :)

Edited by _8OO5TED_

rb25 has a far better head for flow than rb20 so you're already losing

the 500cc difference means squat all in comparison in my opinion

rb25 isn't built any tougher than an rb20 though, so you'll bend or break things anyway

Dont forget, R32 GTSt is between 1250-1300kg. An R32 GTR more like 1550kg. So you dont really miss the torque as the car is reasonably light.

If you want general all rounf performance keep an eye on power to weight. An R32 GTSt with 230rwkws will not be a slow car. With sensible suspension, wheels and tyres it will do mid 12s at the drags, and be on par if not quicker then std turbo GTRs. (Gross generalisation but i think there is some truth to it)

The head flow thing is interesting as well. Sure the RB25 has bigger valves, but what is the ratio of the cc of each cylinder to the total inlet and exhaust valve face area?

I have never done the calc, but could be interesting. Ditto the SR20 vs the RB20, as each cylinder has less cc, and the smaller physical valve size may not be such a big deal when you look at it as a percentage of cylinder displacement.

rb20 = lag

but its f**king reliable and very kind to its owner...

not sure one could say the same for an rb26.. it generally needs money adn TLC to keep going from what i have read

With RB26 and being reliable, they need one good rebuild IMO and that cant include shortcuts, then go and abuse it however you please!

If you had a standard RB26 and didnt do boost exhaust etc and treated it well it would last for ages, the thing is, who buys a GTR to baby it? They're all driven as hard as they can be at one point in their life at least, and after 200,000k's in some cases you cant really blame them for bearing failure etc :O

Dont forget, R32 GTSt is between 1250-1300kg. An R32 GTR more like 1550kg. So you dont really miss the torque as the car is reasonably light.

If you want general all rounf performance keep an eye on power to weight. An R32 GTSt with 230rwkws will not be a slow car. With sensible suspension, wheels and tyres it will do mid 12s at the drags, and be on par if not quicker then std turbo GTRs. (Gross generalisation but i think there is some truth to it)

Standard turbo GTR R32 running 15psi and clutch etc should do a mid to low 12 :laugh:

When are you GTR guys going to come to terms with the fact that your cars plain suck! :O

...lol and when are ppl going to stop comparing them? A neat GTSt will be a good all round car. A std GTR is a good all round car. From what i have seen a GTR doesnt have to be very modded to be an even better car, as the factory gave the thing pretty good gear from the start.

...doesnt change the fact that GTR owners have to use velcro shoes because they struggle with shoe laces :laugh:

When are you GTR guys going to come to terms with the fact that your cars plain suck! :O

Lol

I give credit where credit is due

I drove an R32 GTST, the boost never came, even though it was lighter than a GTR which was good i would still take a more peaky turbo/motor combo over the RB20 standard setup

:laugh:

Anyway this thread isnt about GTR vs the world, in answer to the question, you can get heaps of power out of the RB20 for the R32 shell (good power to weight i mean) but as for it matching a GTR, doubtful IMO, there are some out there with huge power, but power is no good without traction

...i dont :)

Im going to so kick some GTR ass at Wakefield....and if i dont ive got a long list of excuses already prepared. :)

LOL!!!

Ill be there, look for the guy hungover with an SAU shirt on and a can in hand - come say Hi :)

if u want reliability then stick with the rb20

funny that the rb20 is older yet seems there is many more 25's and 26's blowing up... maybe due to the fact that every man and his dog has either an r33 or 89 gtr

Also, the more powerful motors are thrashed harder IMO so they have a much harder life

Rebuild time is just a good chance to upgrade anyway :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...