Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if u want reliability then stick with the rb20

funny that the rb20 is older yet seems there is many more 25's and 26's blowing up... maybe due to the fact that every man and his dog has either an r33 or 89 gtr

reliability or does that mean their owns drive like girls?

seriously, I reckon it had an rb20 in it for a very good reason and should stay an rb20

rb20's are fullly sick

except for the externally gated ones. they're gay.

anyways

r32 - 2530 - 12psi - bilstein suspension - power fc (me)

r33 - stock turb - 10-11psi - stock suspension - stock ecu (liz)

=

@ oran park

r32 just keeping infront of the r33

alittle more work i think is needed for the r32's to keep up

I reckon with the weight of the r32, really you don't need the extra power (don't hit me for saying this) of the rb25, just need to put a little more coin into it as george said.

nathy boy

obviously your driving ability out does mine....... quite obvious!

so i was using liz as an example because i would say her ability and mine are similar. Dont you think??

As your pointing out she should of whipped my ass if she was at your level? right?

and i was refering to the aaron mcgill day not long ago not the renew day @ oran park.

my previous comments were based on the fact that two similar drivers in an r32 and a r33, the r32 would need more to keep up in my opinion. i think you took my post the wrong way mate. just have another read of it

werent u running semi slicks???

cheers

George

I'll whip you both next time, hope that'll settle the argument.

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

well i can say only one thing. dollar for dollar id go the RB 26 way. that engine has prooven its self. it is world renowed for its strength, ease of tune. that engine is just the monster of an engine. when i started workin and i went on vacation to europe i could have bought a second hand ferrari 575M fairly cheap ($100K) but still i choose my R33 skyline above its. als for the RB 20 and RB25, the rb 20 will be way to laggy on low reve if using a big turbo, the Rb 25 (i dont have much experience with that RB 25) could also be a monster of a engine. but still id go the GTR RB 26 way

reliability or does that mean their owns drive like girls?

seriously, I reckon it had an rb20 in it for a very good reason and should stay an rb20

I reckon with the weight of the r32, really you don't need the extra power (don't hit me for saying this) of the rb25, just need to put a little more coin into it as george said.

I'll whip you both next time, hope that'll settle the argument.

Umm liz I'll keep my comments to myself about you whipping me...

No i wasn't running semi's at oran park but at wakie yes. to tell the truth i think your car should be faster as being lighter of the two and with mods.

RB20 with std ECU, cat back exhaust , air filter and a FMIC but on used crappy 2nd hand tyres that i use to use for track days... my RB20 is quicker then your RB25, and you had semis :( So the engine cant be that different in the grand scheme of things. More displacement would be great. I still think you can end up with the sort of power im making now for less money then an RB25 transplant, which will give you about 200rwkws. I woudl be amazed if there was a 200rwkws RB25 out there quicker then my car!?!?!?!?!?!

RB20 POWAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :(

I've never been in Roy's but from the dyno graph it does look impressive, looks like it has that 'fun' factor. :)

Darren and Chris were driving it with the old tune and exhaust housing (didnt you have a drive as well?), it is completely different now. I still dont think it was too bad before.

Just wait until Dutton in a few weeks, be funny to see how the stock std ol RB20 goes against some of the exotics at Sandown and Winton...cant wait.

Darren and Chris were driving it with the old tune and exhaust housing (didnt you have a drive as well?), it is completely different now. I still dont think it was too bad before.

Nope haven't taken it for a spin... :(

I miss rev's... :(

Ha Ha, we are all very passionate about our cars it seems. I'll be at wakefield as well and hope to see most of you there. There was a mention of traction however the GTS-4 is available as well. Good to hear the fors and againsts.

Hmm, were you intending to start a catfight?

Which car is faster at the drags depends mostly on the size of your wallet.

Which car is faster in the twisty mountain passes depends on driver skill.

I have spent less all up on my 32 gts4 (inc. purchase price) thank my friend has spent modifying his 33 gtr and I still keep up with him in the twisties... Im not saying im brock jr, he just loves getting the thing out of shape, does'nt care for balance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think this is just a product of how the US market works for this stuff. Shops are expensive and there's no real way of knowing what kind of results you're going to get, people don't really have the institutional knowledge. I have heard too much at this point to really put faith in anybody "full service" except maybe DSport and they aren't really a full service kind of shop. If you go to the right place I have no doubt they'll get it right for you. Some locals have set it up right but the cost really is nuts and even now they're still fighting issues. And you know I'm a crazy person who thinks things like twin scroll, relatively short low-mount cast headers, PCV recirc to intake, recirculating BOV, right-sized for ~400 whp, MAF load, validating all of that to a standard comparable to OEM test programs, etc are relevant. For what it's worth, multiple local owners at this point have been stuck in a perpetual cycle of blowing a motor -> getting someone to rebuild it -> some missed detail causes the bearings to wipe and spin just outside of break-in mileage or drop valves or some other catastrophe -> cycle repeats. I usually only find out about this because I'm perpetually helping random friends with diagnosing car troubles, Skyline or otherwise. The single turbo stuff if I'm honest is mostly secondary, it just doesn't seem to achieve the numbers in the ~2000-3000 rpm region that I would expect given the results I've seen here or in Motive's videos. I don't really know what we're missing here in the US to be causing this. Lots of people like to emphasize the necessity of finishing the project first and foremost, but I'm not made of money and I can't afford to be trashing a 15k+ USD engine build with any regularity. Or spending my relatively limited garage time these days unable to triangulate problems because too much was changed all at once. Also, even if it isn't a catastrophic failure I would consider spending the cost of single turbo conversion with nothing to show for it to be pretty bad. 
    • The water pump is know to leak as well. So if the coolant is low checking that first as well as hoses. 
    • Reading your posts Josh, sometimes I feel like I've gone in a time machine back to the 90's when everyone was doe-eyed and figuring things out for the first time.  I've lost track of how many single turbo GTR's I've seen on track that haven't burnt down lol. Everything has been figured out a long time ago. These things are at the point now where its essentially turn-key to go single turbo. 
    • Among other things yes. Making sure to either use an oil pressure regulator or the right restrictor size for your oil pump/range of oil viscosities you intend to run, making sure you plumb the lines correctly, turbo should be placed such that it siphons properly even when the water pump isn't turning so you don't boil coolant in the turbo after shutdown, oil return should be low resistance and also preferably picking the one that is most likely to return to the pickup as opposed to some other irrelevant part of the pan. It's far from impossible to figure this out but I have seen people really, really struggle and if that's the case it's easier to just take the path of least resistance. To me, bolt-on twin turbos are a fixed cost whereas single turbo is almost unbounded.
    • Latest round of updates on the car. I purchased and installed a SWS clutch slipper to help with 60ft times and got some second-hand good condition 275/40R17 Hoosier DR2 radials. Test and tune in November showed the tyres were an upgrade over my over 15 year old mickey Thompson's and I got a 1.8 second 60ft and pb et of 11.71 but even then, that run wasn't great due to rain and driver error (the event got called off 10 minutes later fast forward to the weekend just gone 25th of Jan and there was finally a break in the weather to let racing happen. The first run the track was slippery and only managed a 12.1@129 Second run the track was better and got a new pb et and mph: 11.54@131   Lith and I then worked out that I installed the previously mentioned clutch slipper incorrectly and its never been working, and I had just been dumping the clutch the entire time, we also noticed it was on street boost and not race boost. So I lined up for a third run with the car turned up in the first two gears, but the passengers side axle objected to clutch dumps and left the chat which stopped my weekend.   so there will be another attempt in the future once I replace the tyres as they rubbed and are stuffed now. but a low 11 should be on the cards.
×
×
  • Create New...