Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Why bother explaining these things to narrow minded 'car enthusiasts', who most probably have never driven a HSV, let alone a VE HSV??

I have a 180sx and have recently bought a VX Clubby. The simple fact is there are no direct competitors, bar FPV, for what these cars are designed to do for under $150k. Simple.

A big car that is quick, comfortable, looks good (personal opinion), can carry five 6 foot plus adults in complete comfort for under 200k. Damn good value in my opinion. And they sound great too :P

I'll bet it's surprisingly good on fuel too. Narrow minded prejudice about V8s is pathetic, and the arguements are outdated and wrong.

They are cheap as to mod, intake, exhaust and tune and you are looking at 250+rwkW. Do a cam change and you are looking at 300+rwkW. Turbo for $7k + fitment and you are looking at 400+rwkW.

They run low 12s on 18" street tyres with bolt ons and 250rwkW. They are cheap and extremely reliable. The VZ Clubby is capable of 1.10s around Wakefield with soft tyres. Also it can tow, it can carry 5 adults comfortably, both at once if required.

What can do all that for the money?

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Looking at it again. I think Id rather an SS. Its those rear lights. They flow WAY better on the SS. It stuffs the lines sooo bad on this.

I wouldnt mind taking one for a test drive though. If what was on that program the other day is true (at least with the suspension) it should be a pretty good car to drive. I think build quality MIGHT be the only let down, but with $500mill in new robots etc, I cant see that being a major issue for the price of the car.

i remember when the first shots of this new holden were released someone on here said "dont knock it till you actualy see it in real life because it looks pretty hot"

well to whoever that person is, THEY ARE EVEN WORSE IN REAL LIFE, worst sedan i have seen come out of holden in along time

..........i dunno if its just me but for 1 billion dallars i think they should have come up with something a little more original.

cant wait for the new fords

Edited by thorpe84

They may be nice cars tech wise, ill admit. I love the sound of a holden V8, and love it when the rare chance comes that i can drive one, but as far as looks go its pretty unorignial. But i guess as time goes by, its getting harder and harder to do something that hasnt been done similarly on another vehicle.

Im glad they re-introduced wheel flares, as the VTs etc looked crap mainly cos of that lack of the muscley look the falcons had cos of the little bit of shape the BAs and AUs etc had around the wheel arches. But i think theyve gone too far, andyep. Very mazda. PLus random other styling cues.

new hsv gets body styling parts bin -

flared guards by MAZDA 3 sedan

roofline by AU falcon

Headlights by BA falcon

RIMS by F6 typhoon

Shit the whole CAR looks like a mazda 3 sedan...

Edited by qikstagea

You know fellas I'm old school as they come. Being a V8 guy my whole life I'm still kinda partial to them.

You can say what you want about the Chev and ford errr I mean holden. THey are cheap to mod. esp in the states. As for being a dinosuar bro all I have to say to you is "King of the Hill"

For those that don't know what that is look up ZR1 Corvette it was a quad cam 5.7L that redlined at 7000rpm. If I rememeber correctly was over 400+hp out of the box and that was back late 89 to 95.

But they did do a quad cam V8. the reason it dint take off was cost. Technology is there just depends how much you wanna pay.

As for me I like the HSV new line is it my fave nahhhh I'm a vette man. But I've had my fun with the V8 just not the King of the Hill. I love fast cars no matter who makes them.

And to all you V8 haters.......

Dont hate the playa hate the game :ninja:

haha i just looked in the other thread with the pics of the 'new' evo and it looks like this HSV... so to the people who said they like the look of the EVO they must like this car aswell....

You guys have ripped the shit out of this car! Its not that bad, wow they have gone for a differnt style! You can get any car and say its made up of similar designs and lines to another car.

Get over it, look beyond the fact that it is a Holden.. It looks good (in those pics anyway) :ninja:

For those that don't know what that is look up ZR1 Corvette it was a quad cam 5.7L that redlined at 7000rpm. If I rememeber correctly was over 400+hp out of the box and that was back late 89 to 95.

But they did do a quad cam V8. the reason it dint take off was cost. Technology is there just depends how much you wanna pay.

the LT5 motor is still used today in boat racing

altho i dont c how it costs so much when other companies had quad cam v8's already

With the size of our cars in the states weight would not be that much of factor. Besides you gain soooo much more have a the quad cam anyway. It was just cost. That I can remember. The minute you say corvette price of parts doubled, minute you say ZR1 man that was special order. Then the brass at GM said it was too expensive to keep making them and no one buying them.... so it was cut.

As for boats there is still afew out there.

I personally love the 427BB 7.0L for you guys with accents :ninja:

:ninja:

It looks like a patchwork quilt. Bits and pieces of all the cars on the road today slapped together with a big donk under the bonnet. It just doesn't flow.

Man the lines flow on the proper car. They flow from the front lip of the front bar all the way to the rear. (hsv exempted) You cant say it doesnt flow. You just dont like holden, so you dont want it to flow. I've looked very closely at it again and again, but sure as heck, it flows!

I'll bet it's surprisingly good on fuel too. Narrow minded prejudice about V8s is pathetic, and the arguements are outdated and wrong.

They are cheap as to mod, intake, exhaust and tune and you are looking at 250+rwkW. Do a cam change and you are looking at 300+rwkW. Turbo for $7k + fitment and you are looking at 400+rwkW.

They run low 12s on 18" street tyres with bolt ons and 250rwkW. They are cheap and extremely reliable. The VZ Clubby is capable of 1.10s around Wakefield with soft tyres. Also it can tow, it can carry 5 adults comfortably, both at once if required.

What can do all that for the money?

Spot on mate.

It's fuel economy is not that bad, especuially after a re-tune. It's downfall is city driving, it mows petrol then, but no worse than a GT-R, RX-8 etc. It get about 9l/100km on the freeway.

Spot on mate.

It's fuel economy is not that bad, especuially after a re-tune. It's downfall is city driving, it mows petrol then, but no worse than a GT-R, RX-8 etc. It get about 9l/100km on the freeway.

I think its always been like this with the 8's.

My old VS 5ltr 5speed would get around 16l/100km's locally then on the open road a whopping 9.2L/100km's.

Man the lines flow on the proper car. They flow from the front lip of the front bar all the way to the rear. (hsv exempted) You cant say it doesnt flow. You just dont like holden, so you dont want it to flow. I've looked very closely at it again and again, but sure as heck, it flows!

The Commodore range looks good as, the SS especially. It might be the pics i've been looking at of the HSV but the taillights look out of place, seems as though the only changed them for the sake of being different to the commodores. I should have been clearer when i said "it doesn't flow", I was referring to the front and rear of the car.

With the size of our cars in the states weight would not be that much of factor. Besides you gain soooo much more have a the quad cam anyway. It was just cost. That I can remember. The minute you say corvette price of parts doubled, minute you say ZR1 man that was special order. Then the brass at GM said it was too expensive to keep making them and no one buying them.... so it was cut.

As for boats there is still afew out there.

I personally love the 427BB 7.0L for you guys with accents :D

The Corvette Z06 with the lS7 7L makes 500hp stock and revs to 7k. Fastest poduction car around Nurburgring for a while this year. Only US$65k (IIRC). Makes 500rwhp with bolt ons. Runs 11.6 stock. Would run a 10 with bolt ons. And on street tyres. Awesome, awesome car.

i dont like the new commodore simply for the fact that is enormigitastically big, i mean with todays roads in aus, traffic is a huge problem, as is space, and giving people a 2tonne weapon which no doubt will have bad vision spots all around the car, especially reversing, just seems stupid to me, fine make it roomy, but gee' the old commodores were roomy and alot smaller

and on another note, does the hsv coupe signature look like a giant holden calibra to any one else? and the commodore just looks like an oversized vectra

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Got you mate. Check your email!
    • I see you've never had to push start your own car... You could save some weight right now...
    • Sounds good.  I don't 100% understand what your getting at here. When you say, "I keep seeing YouTube videos where people have new paint and primer land on the old clearcoat that isn't even dulled down" do you mean this - there is a panel with factory paint, without any prep work, they paint the entire panel with primer, then colour then clear?  If that's what you mean, sure it will "stick" for a year, 2 years, maybe 3 years? Who knows. But at some stage it will flake off and when it does it's going to come off in huge chunks and look horrific.  Of course read your technical data sheet for your paint, but generally speaking, you can apply primer to a scuffed/prepped clear coat. Generally speaking, I wouldn't do this. I would scuff/prep the clear and then lay colour then clear. Adding the primer to these steps just adds cost and time. It will stick to the clear coat provided it has been appropriately scuffed/prepped first.  When you say, "but the new paint is landing on the old clearcoat" I am imagining someone not masking up the car and just letting overspray go wherever it wants. Surely this isn't what you mean?  So I'll assume the following scenario - there is a small scratch. The person manages to somehow fill the scratch and now has a perfectly flat surface. They then spray colour and clear over this small masked off section of the car. Is this what you mean? If this is the case, yes the new paint will eventually flake off in X number of years time.  The easy solution is to scuff/prep all of the paint that hasn't been masked off in the repair area then lay the paint.  So you want to prep the surface, lay primer, then lay filler, then lay primer, then colour, then clear?  Life seems so much simpler if you prep, fill, primer, colour then clear.  There are very few reasons to go to bare metal. Chasing rust is a good example of why you'd go to bare metal.  A simple dent, there is no way in hell I'm going to bare metal for that repair. I've got enough on my plate without creating extra work for myself lol. 
    • Hi, Got the membership renewal email but haven't acted yet.  I need to change my address first. So if somebody can email me so I can change it that would be good.    
×
×
  • Create New...