Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

rb120why...

is that an rb20?

and what gearbox?

nice results though mate

yeah mate... RB20 6 cylinders with the RB25 auto behind it. I guess im lucky and have a weight advantage against the skylines :P

The afm is now before the throttle body with a K&N filter on the turbo

post-24062-1162905551.jpg

The red button on the right dash is the overdrive switch

post-24062-1162905769.jpg

Edited by RB120WHY
nice mate :P

where did you get the automatic work done?

Auto is stock mate... Just the shift controller and shift kit from MV Automatics.

Shift kit dropped my times from 14.1 @ 103 to 13.3 @ 108 before i had the first tune done...This was the best mod i have done so far :( Im learning more about the car every day :(

I have been inspired to mod the R33 auto properly. Been buying up bits and doing the research.

So far the car is quite stock just a BATMBL split dump/front pipe and Fujitsubo catback.

Definate upgrades will be:

Splitfire coil packs (current ones are shagged, just need to put these in)

PRofec B Spec-II

Bosch 040 (stock one isn't keeping up as is)

Z32 AFM

Undecided upgrades:

E-Manage with all 3 harnesses vs SAFC2 + SITC (both around $600 solutions except that's brand new for E-Manage)

Slide vs GCG Hi-Flow (probably come down to cost meaning Slide, already have a spare turbo)

550cc injectors (if required, do I need a fuel reg then as well?)

FMIC vs R34 SMIC (the FMICs are getting so cheap and are supporting 300+rwkw why not get one?)

Probably forgetting something but you get the idea. Mechanic reckons it currently has ~135/140rwkw but couldn't safely do a power run with the fuel issues. Once everything is on don't really know what to expect, hopefully over 200rwkw, we'll see. Fingers crossed, cheque book out :happy:

scrap the emanage or safc

get a power fc and tune it properly.

wont work bla bla bla...

i have been running a power fc on my S1 r33 auto for 12 months with the standard trans without an issue

and 4 door sleeper has had a power fc for a couple of years.

Ditch the PowerFC idea too ... unless of course you don't like your auto and want it to blow up on you. How much power do you have dangerman4? How are you compensating for the ignition retardation each time the auto shifts gears?

mate,

ditch the z32 AFM idea and profec B idea and replace with FMIC kit (eg justjap) and turbutech boost controller..

then spend the rest on shift kit and high-stall and trans cooler :verymad:

Why would I replace the Z32 AFM with a FMIC when I am already going to get both? Especially when the standard AFM will most likely be maxed out.

I also want more than one boost setting and be able to do it from the cabin so yeah I've paid what $360 for the pleasure, it happens.

scrap the emanage or safc

get a power fc and tune it properly.

wont work bla bla bla...

i have been running a power fc on my S1 r33 auto for 12 months with the standard trans without an issue

and 4 door sleeper has had a power fc for a couple of years.

This is a possibility and there is the fact that PFCs are easy to sell so if it doesn't work out the loss isn't as bad.

oh no, please not the powerFC in an auto arguement again! there's a whole thread for that...

safe to say a remap is a great idea and is available for all models of skylines these days...

I wasn't aware that the R33 and R34s could now be remapped, afaik they can't be only the R32s.

Ditch the PowerFC idea too ... unless of course you don't like your auto and want it to blow up on you. How much power do you have dangerman4? How are you compensating for the ignition retardation each time the auto shifts gears?

That would be over 300rwkw, MV stage 2 shift kit and a large trans cooler as per his post.

Yes the shift logic is really good and it's a shame to get rid of it.

there's a guy in sydney who re-tunes R33's (do a search)

and i know mercury motorsport (www.mercurymotorsport.com.au) tune R34's so it can be done

when i said replace z32 with FMIC, i mean don't get a z32, use the standard one (it will work fine) and use the cash to get a FMIC kit

Interesting that the HKS F-CON removes the ignition retard for up shifts on autos.

Please explain?? I think I have that very problem, didn't realise it was normal, my gear changes are very laggy and feeels like the car forgets to change gears for a second.

Here's my details:

Hybrid FMIC

Pod Filter With Sheild and CAI

HKS EVC IV at 8.5 PSI

Stock Exhaust

SAFC2

160kW

------------------

Hybrid FMIC

Pod Filter With Sheild and CAI

HKS EVC IV at 11 PSI

Turbo Back Exhaust with Hi-FLow cat

SAFC2

180.5kW

post-11124-1163416451.jpg

post-11124-1163416476.jpg

post-11124-1163416501.jpg

Please explain?? I think I have that very problem, didn't realise it was normal, my gear changes are very laggy and feeels like the car forgets to change gears for a second.

Hmm

I'm not exactly sure what you mean. It does take a second (I think it is literally one full second) to change gear. One of the listed features on the F-CON is removing the ignition retard on upshifts when running with an auto. I am assuming this is an optional feature. This means running a F-CON with this feature on would mean that the most stressful (I assume) change on the auto box being the down shift when you plant the foot would still have that ignition retard and those under brakes. The subsequent up-shifts when accelerating would not have the ignition retard and just slam that sucker into gear, exactly what most of the 'can't run a PFC in an auto' crowd are so afraid of.

I wouldn't mind an F-CON except that no one in Vic can tune them and they are just as if not more expensive than a PFC.

I think you've mis-interpreted what the F-CON does with autos... it doesn't remove ignition retard; it actually imposes the ignition retard.

Have a read through some of SK's posts on Autos and ECUs - he stresses the importance of the ignition retard with autos.

I've got the F-CON V Pro installed; car shifts solidly and rapidliy. Mind you I'm running a fully rebuilt gearbox with a shift kit. Shifts are instantaneous when off throttle and takes about 0.5-1.0seconds when on throttle.

The directness of the changes is so good and sharp that there is quite a "thud" when I'm changing gears. Sounds like something is breaking :thumbsup:

I think you've mis-interpreted what the F-CON does with autos... it doesn't remove ignition retard; it actually imposes the ignition retard.

Have a read through some of SK's posts on Autos and ECUs - he stresses the importance of the ignition retard with autos.

I've got the F-CON V Pro installed; car shifts solidly and rapidliy. Mind you I'm running a fully rebuilt gearbox with a shift kit. Shifts are instantaneous when off throttle and takes about 0.5-1.0seconds when on throttle.

The directness of the changes is so good and sharp that there is quite a "thud" when I'm changing gears. Sounds like something is breaking :thumbsup:

Don't see how else this can be interpreted

A/T shift compensation

This function avoids the ignition from retard angle compensation when an up shift is performed in a car with an automatic transmission.

Hoever that is from the SZ maybe the V is different.

Edited by DivHunter

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
×
×
  • Create New...