Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i think he his plan is that by removing the aircon he can run shorter cooler pipes so he has better throttle response.

what you have to take into consideration is that if you have the cooler pipes too short you tighten the bends, which makes the air have to change direction more suddenly. if that pic is of the setup ypu are trying to shorten, then there isn't much you can do before you start compromising air speed.

another option would be to fit a smaller cooler. removing 6 inches of cooler will reduce the air volume by more than removing 6 inches of piping.

How do you plan to achieve throttle response? Stop being so secretive :D

Not being secretive.

Untimately the aim is to keep the intercooler piping as short as possible and with as little bends as possible.

We can play around with intercooler sizes, end tank designs... the sky is the limit.

At the same time using chinese factories to keep the prices down but keep quality up to a good level (as seen with the bar and plate cores that people are using in 400+ rwkw cars).

We recently did a project for the VL guys which can be seen here: http://www.calaisturbo.com.au/showthread.php?t=78364 (the aim of that project was to keep the intercooler hidden aswell as avoiding any holes being cut in the chassis)

Greg

Edited by EXAUNV
I'm not talking about losing the aircon due to the power loss. I'm talking about losing the aircon for space in the engine bay/front of the car.

dude, SR20 is GIVING you room if your not using an RB20.

room should be your friend.

Keep the aircon - or suffer in the heat (in silence) :D

300rwkw - never going to get rid of my aircon. I dont care what i have to do

And if you notice a throttle difference with an extra bend or two, i'll hand you a medal ;)

Cause you wont notice it at all IMO.

dude, SR20 is GIVING you room if your not using an RB20.

room should be your friend.

Keep the aircon - or suffer in the heat (in silence) :D

300rwkw - never going to get rid of my aircon. I dont care what i have to do

And if you notice a throttle difference with an extra bend or two, i'll hand you a medal ;)

Cause you wont notice it at all IMO.

You think that there wont be a noticable difference going from a Hyrbid style intercooler kit to the one I'm using in my R32? (or any other cooler kit that's remotely similiar)

I'm not talking about making kits for an SR in the skyline range as there is clearly enough room (as seen in my R32), but I'm asking to see how many people are actually using their aircon and how many people would lose it for a setup like this.

With the SR range of cars, it's not necessary to lose your air con.

Greg

Edited by EXAUNV
umm. the ac compressor turns of at any major load any way :D

just the extra heat through the radiator youve gotta wory about. its gives NO LOSS OF POWER at all.

so just bask in the nice chilled enviroment lol

We're not talking in terms of power loss from the AC compressor.

We're talking in terms of space in the engine bay.

Greg

do a search for some of the many posts by sydneykid regarding shorter cooler pipes and how removing 20cm of pipe is going to make no difference, but to do the maths

at 3000 rpm and zero boost / vac your 2.5L engine is consuming 3750L of air per minute or 62.5L per second

assuming u save 20cm of pipe and that its 2.5inch pipe that will have a volume of approx. 1.5L in that pipe.

so your engine will consume that air in 0.024 of a second, now add boost etc....to the equation and is it worth sacrificing your aircon for 0.024s of throttle response

sorry if this is wrong but as my understanding goes this is how it'd work

do a search for some of the many posts by sydneykid regarding shorter cooler pipes and how removing 20cm of pipe is going to make no difference, but to do the maths

at 3000 rpm and zero boost / vac your 2.5L engine is consuming 3750L of air per minute or 62.5L per second

assuming u save 20cm of pipe and that its 2.5inch pipe that will have a volume of approx. 1.5L in that pipe.

so your engine will consume that air in 0.024 of a second, now add boost etc....to the equation and is it worth sacrificing your aircon for 0.024s of throttle response

sorry if this is wrong but as my understanding goes this is how it'd work

20cm's of pipe?

You'll be losing around 2 meters, aswell as around 600+ degrees worth of bends.

Thats still only .2 seconds

In theory, pollsibly...

One of the drift cars we used to sponsor (180/s15 front) had a FMIC install, it's now running a V mount setup and the difference in throttle response is incredible!! I can't time it, but you sure can feel the difference.

If the RB guys aren't interested in these sorts of kits, that's not a problem. We'll just make them for the SR's.

Greg

I don't understand the concept of a vmount setup?

Any crude diagrams or picture examples?

What I really want though... :)

An FMIC setup that uses the std piping route. I would like an fmic to fill the whole front bar inlet as to let as much as possible air pass through to the radiator.

Currently as can be seen the end tanks block of a considerable amount of the front bar.

The core i'm using is apparently a spearco bar/plate core 450x260x90 *from memory* with sligh off centrally located inlet/outlets. being center located makes it easy for the hot fmic inlet pipe to do a 2 x 90 degree turns to enter the fmic (drivers side). It runs crappy 2.25" piping. :)

post-382-1156551019.jpg

I don't understand the concept of a vmount setup?

Any crude diagrams or picture examples?

What I really want though... :)

An FMIC setup that uses the std piping route. I would like an fmic to fill the whole front bar inlet as to let as much as possible air pass through to the radiator.

Currently as can be seen the end tanks block of a considerable amount of the front bar.

The core i'm using is apparently a spearco bar/plate core 450x260x90 *from memory* with sligh off centrally located inlet/outlets. being center located makes it easy for the hot fmic inlet pipe to do a 2 x 90 degree turns to enter the fmic (drivers side). It runs crappy 2.25" piping. :(

I don't have any pictures handy, but the overall idea is to have the radiator sitting on a 45 degree angle and your intercooler sitting on a 45 degree angle, the overall the advantage is that the pipes are shorter, and neither your intercooler or radiator are getting less air flow. The disadvantage to this setup is heat soak.

Greg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...