Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

Ive booked my rb30det in for a LPG conversion and the tuner said that he can tune my power fc with just advanced timing...

question i want to know is what do i not need to now run the engine?

do i need a AFM since its just spark as the LPG carby controls gas flow?

do i need an Exhaust 02 sensor? (ecu doesnt need to increase/decrease timing as it will be manually set if possible?)

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131556-power-fc-tech-question/
Share on other sites

Depends on the setup.

The gas injection setups replace your petrol injectors with gas injectors. The ecu then controls the injections in the usual duty cycle manner. This is the best setup for performance, reliability, economy and safety.

If you run a gas carb setup well... On N/A's they place a massive restriction on the inlet lowering performance BUT they do offer excellent economy.

SOME gas systems utilize the o2 sensor and run closed loop mode, so again better economy.

Yes you still need an AFM as how will the motor know what load is being placed on the motor.

Please do keep us posted with the results and problems you come across, shall be an interesting read. :P

What setup are you going? Gas injection, gas carby or the old gas O-ring setup.

The LPG thing has been popping up a bit lately, understandable with the ever increasing fuel prices. Here is short blurb I posted on the Stagea forum yesterday;

Here’s a quick run down on why LPG is a bad idea;

1. You need 1.3 litres of LPG to go as far as 1 litre of 98 ron.

2. The LPG tank (being a pressure vessel) has thicker walls, hence for the same outside dimensions it will hold 20% less.

3. Add 1 & 2 together and it means 50% less distance between refills compared to he same dimensioned petrol tank.

4. LPG is now 99 ron, the 110 ron dropped to get the price down

5. There isn’t an LPG system designed for RB’s, so you would need one to be made up “special”. Think lots of $’s.

6. They will use a single point gas mixer (not 6 injectors, not sequential), it will simply be connected to the throttle, more throttle opening = more gas squirted in. No fuel mapping as such.

7. Your standard ECU will run the ignition etc

8. Driveability, cold start and run, hot run etc will all suffer as a result of the poor (in comparison) fuel metering.

9. If you live in a cold area you won’t be able to drive your car until it warms up. If you don’t warm it up, drive off and accidentally use too much throttle you may well get a gas explosion in the inlet system. Not large enough to hurt you but large enough to require a top end rebuild.

:P cheers :(

Its getting the Gas research throttle body - so its a carby setup tuner said i should get between 300kms and 400kms to a tank og gas :P

Good stuff, the gas research carby completely slipped my mind. There is another much more restrictive gas carby that I have had experience with. Absolutely riped the guts out of performance. But it did return damn close to petrol fuel economy on cruise. However, give it a boot full and it sucked considerably more.

SK is on the ball with the lower octane rating, it also varys from servo to servo.

With regards to backfiring I never had any issues with the gas carby but did on the old O-ring setup.

Another issue I came across is when the motor is cold, give it a bootfull and the gas convertor will freeze as the water temp is unable to handle the conversion rate. This isn't an issue if you don't boot it until water temp is at least up.

I would only ever consider a gas conversion if it were to use gas injection. The carby setup has many flaws, as sk has suggested.

There may be some flaws but if i pay 55c per litre for my 70litre tank and get 400kms opposed to $1.55 for 98ron to fill up 68 litres to get 450km - i can see a cost difference and hopefully my wallet will too...

and on reliability

there are a couple of 9/10/11 second VL turbos going around on gas carby setups... i think its alot of people saying what they think rather than what they know. (no offence sk, maybe you do know)

There may be some flaws but if i pay 55c per litre for my 70litre tank and get 400kms opposed to $1.55 for 98ron to fill up 68 litres to get 450km - i can see a cost difference and hopefully my wallet will too...

and on reliability

there are a couple of 9/10/11 second VL turbos going around on gas carby setups... i think its alot of people saying what they think rather than what they know. (no offence sk, maybe you do know)

i thought there was a few VLs around to runing very low times on LPG (and if not im damn sure there are some V8's), but on fullboost its sayin that the RED XE(F?) is the first running 9s on LPG.

as for the backfiring, good systems hsouldnt do it. i was reading up on one the other day, an XR6T makin about 368rwkw (automatically switching between petrol and LPG as the injectors oculdnt supply enough LPG high in the rev range) and supposedly the guy started it and straight away gave it a good hard rev... no backfire, and if he did it that time, it would only have been because he knew it wouldnt backfire... so in short, wait for a bit more developement before going LPG. i thought LPG was at 110 too, but now that i know it isnt, its not lookin as appealing

there;s another thread about LPG have a read...

i had it setup on my old car - an 87 supra non-turbo and atill have it on out family car an R31

there were a lot of tething problems in getting it setup with the system "freezing" and a whole lot of other issues

also as mentioned, the fuel economy is terrible - i used to fill up every second day and that's not an exaggeration...

LPG = stupid idea.

my opinion - do what you want.

my parents car is a 94 falcon converted to run on gas because of the long trips they make

again there is only a 50km per tank difference at just over 1/3 the price of petrol

anyways, $500 from my pocket, $2000 rebate, i dont care if i lose 20rwkw in the process because im still going to have a fast car and a fast car that will be cheaper to fill up than petrol

i dont care if i lose 20rwkw in the process because im still going to have a fast car and a fast car that will be cheaper to fill up than petrol

I have yet to see an aftermarket LPG system that doesn’t loose at least 15% in power. So I strongly suggest that you do the maths on your car, our R33GTST would look like this

205 rwkw + 60 kw losses = 265 kw

265 kw – 15% = 225 kw

225 kw – 60 kw losses = 165 rwkw

That’s a 40 rwkw loss.

Forget about the max power loss, that is minor compared to the driveability you loose. The throttle response is crap, the lag is much more noticeable. The idle is rough, it doesn’t like power steering, aircon and large electrical loads. Plus it will run like shit when it’s cold.

All for a lousy $20 a week, it’s bad value for money in my opinion.

:D cheers :yes:

i thought there was a few VLs around to runing very low times on LPG (and if not im damn sure there are some V8's), but on fullboost its sayin that the RED XE(F?) is the first running 9s on LPG.

as for the backfiring, good systems hsouldnt do it. i was reading up on one the other day, an XR6T makin about 368rwkw (automatically switching between petrol and LPG as the injectors oculdnt supply enough LPG high in the rev range) and supposedly the guy started it and straight away gave it a good hard rev... no backfire, and if he did it that time, it would only have been because he knew it wouldnt backfire... so in short, wait for a bit more developement before going LPG. i thought LPG was at 110 too, but now that i know it isnt, its not lookin as appealing

Tuning LPG for WOT with an auto box for a 1/4 mile run is a piece of cake, try driving the car around everyday. That’s the real test.

The XR6T LPG set up was basically still experimental, the gas injectors are several hundred dollars EACH. They have to be so big to control the gas pressure, plus the gas fittings to feed them, they won’t fit on most inlet manifolds. There are quite a few years of development left until LPG injectors are worthwhile considering, purely from a cost perspective, then there is the packaging aspect.

As for the backfiring and freezing when cold, please tell me when you have found a “good system” because all the ones we have tried all suffer from at least one, and most from all of the symptoms.

:D cheers :yes:

I think your figures are out.. But I could be wrong..

440cfm is around 30.5lb/min. 30.5lb/min is around 335hp or 250kw worth of air at the flywheel, not rear wheels.

So say 190rwkw.

So how about twin gas convertors.... Unless they now have something more suitable since i dropped lpg on my v8 commodore that had an ecu, cams etc.. To be honest.. The cars performance after the conversion is really what made me sell the car.

It didn't however see any cold start issues, backfires or poor economy. BUT performance did suck. You using the propper gas research carb won't see this massive inlet restriction as I did. The gas carby i used sucked.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks, I removed the fuse and the relay from the car and made my own circuit with them to test them with a test bulb.  I will look for the wiring diagram and go from there.
    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
×
×
  • Create New...