Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i blew the stock ones so i went and bought atop condition set which were steel wheel and abit bigger

they have been in storage for ages so he part numbers are pretty much useless, tis is what gcg told me,

all i can say is that compared to the stock ones the front comp cover is the same size, but the wheel is about 5 cm bigger , the rear housing is a .63 item which is 1 size up from the standard one and the rear wheel is about 8 cm bigger that the stock one,

i pulled off the standard ones myself and installed the new ones doing nothing bodgy, and it always runs 12 psi, but for some reason it spools about 3500 rpm and doesnt really kick in until 6000rpm, the thrbos are rated at 350hp each but i really dont think that upgrading to this size over the stock ones would affct the lag issue from full boost at 3.5rpm to now 6000rpm, this is bullshit

the car has a cat back wiv guted cat and a fuel pump, still got stock front pipe and dumps and stock ecu....

the new turbos are pretty much the same if not abit bigger than n1 items.

could it be wastegate actuators or what??

the car used to go well before with the stock turbos but now it goes harder only over 5500 6000 rpm,

i didnt touch nothing on the timing side of things and all i did was remove turbs and replace.

all help appreciated

cheers

denis

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/131571-rb26dett-not-liking-new-turbos/
Share on other sites

:)

Get a ruler out of your draw.

Measure 8cm's and add that onto the stock wheel size... you will soon realise that it cant possibly fit into a housing of that size.

So it kinda answers itself really, no need to get angry :)

You really need to have the turbos inspected IMO.

As wrxhoon said already

Not knowing exacly what turbos you have i wouldnt be able to tell you when a healthy engine would boost.

By what your saying, you have no idea what they are. So people can only offer random suggestions as without knowing what sort of turbos are on there, no-one can accurately say you actually have a problem or not. That might be exactly how those turbos work.

You cant accurately say otherwise if you think the rear wheel is approx 12cm in size as i would be exceptionally doubtful of that :rofl:

Also on that, changing turbos and still using:

Stock Pipes

Stock ECU

Stock Cam Gears

Really isnt going to help the situation either

there's a science to rear AR's fella as ina mathamatical calcualtion per CC of the engine , get this wrong and it will spool early for less peak power or larger power which comes on late like your stating ...

hey take it easy - I'm just trying to figure out how the wheels can be 5cm and 8cm LARGER than the originals and fit in the housings...

I think these measurements are actual sizes and not the increase in size(Bad Sentence Construction)

Also very rude to get a comeback of that nature to a response that was confused about the sentence.

You have been unlucky. I believe you could have the gt-rs turbos or -10 Garrett Turbos making it

a really laggy turbo set up. Now you need to get some dumps, and computer to get them to spool

earlier.

I may be wrong though.

I hope though you are gratefull and not come back like that at me. :)

they have been in storage for ages so he part numbers are pretty much useless, tis is what gcg told me,

What did you/they mean in saying the part numbers are useless? Useless as in they dont correspond to the actual specs of the turbos or useless as in they cant be seen/read?

I assume your wheel size comparo is meant to be millimetres and not cms as well?

i apoligize for the comment i made before and i got my measurements wrong.

VERY SORRY!!!!

the turbos are gcg built so i rang them up and and quoted the part numbers and they said they were old and wouldnt be able to track down 2 much about them

ive looked at a ruler and by goin off the standard ones i can say these figures are still a guess but more close to bieng the sizes i was trying 2 explain before

rear housing .63

rear wheel is around 10 to 15 mm bigger in total, so 5mm to 7.5mm from centre to end

front wheel is about 10mm bigger in total and same again, 5mm from centre 2 housing,

i really didnt think these sizes would increase the lag as it has,

compression is a healthy 150 dead even over all 6.

the best way for me 2 describe the way it drives is its really laggy in boost up till 9, 10 psi, then it starts taking off, but by the time it is mooving its on 5500, 6000 rpm, the turbos are making boost at 3500rpm 4000rpm but u cant feel the shit until 5500, 6000.

its like driving a s14 or s15 wiv the vct unplugged.. shit down low and then suddenly after a certian rev range off it goes.

i was inking maby it could be the computer, gone fully retarded and rich , coz its sucking some juice bad,

all help appreciated, sorry for comment b4 but he was bieng a smartass.

all help appreciated, sorry for comment b4 but he was bieng a smartass.

no he wasnt :P

have you had the GTR on a dyno to see afr's?

if so maybe print it up here for the Professors to scour over...........

i know this sounds stupid and i know its the dumbest thing i can do but i did it aniways just 2 see if it was running rich and retarted,

i pulled it off tap, and went for a drive, just feathering the pedal.

the thing is that i held it flat and its not pingin or nuthin, no afm cutout, but it still has the same shit response.and boost only hits in hard at teh same rpm as b4, no increase in downlow power.

i did this just 2 see if my theory was correct, i put it back 2 normal.

i know this sounds stupid and i know its the dumbest thing i can do but i did it aniways just 2 see if it was running rich and retarted,

i pulled it off tap, and went for a drive, just feathering the pedal.

the thing is that i held it flat and its not pingin or nuthin, no afm cutout, but it still has the same shit response.and boost only hits in hard at teh same rpm as b4, no increase in downlow power.

i did this just 2 see if my theory was correct, i put it back 2 normal.

There is a Turbo set up with a wa fella on here, I forget the name...oh Chad Fletcher.(footballer) If it is really him

He has a N1GTR Motor in a 34gtt , he has boost coming in at around 5500RPM.Nismoid said it was because

the old N1 Turbo's are designed to spool up around there. The interesting thing is he hates this aswell.

The recommendations where to change the turbo's or get some dumps if i recall right. I suspect the units you might have bought are simmiler to these.

There is a Turbo set up with a wa fella on here, I forget the name...oh Chad Fletcher.(footballer) If it is really him

He has a N1GTR Motor in a 34gtt , he has boost coming in at around 5500RPM.Nismoid said it was because

the old N1 Turbo's are designed to spool up around there. The interesting thing is he hates this aswell.

The recommendations where to change the turbo's or get some dumps if i recall right. I suspect the units you might have bought are simmiler to these.

NI turbos will develop over 1 bar at 4,250 rpm if tuned correctly. As usual there are 3 things that he needs tot do..........tuning, tuning, tuning.

:) cheers :)

NI turbos will develop over 1 bar at 4,250 rpm if tuned correctly. As usual there are 3 things that he needs tot do..........tuning, tuning, tuning.

:laugh: cheers :D

:):):)

He had the old N1 turbo's these spool up at 5000RPM Plus. Yes the new N1 Turbo's spool alot earlier

as you have stated.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I would like more noise related info for my truly uneducated guess  Does it do it at idle or when revving, clutch engaged, and disengaged? Does it only do it when the car is moving? I've heard "similar" noises from a clutch pack that left the chat room, and CV joints that have chewed themselves out But as Matt said, how's the yokes, tailshaft and centre bearing going after their last little issue Fingers crossed it is something simple  Weird noises make me cringe 
    • One other question, is there a chance that changing the idle speed can lead you down a rabbit hole and is the reason the tuner didn't touch it? Reason I ask is because if that's the reason the tuner avoided it then I probably shouldn't be touching it lol.
    • Pfft. As if I'd ever point a high pressure washer at my car.
    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I could do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free. It's only about 50L per year, but that's ~$100. A few extra pizzas is always welcome. Note that I have a record of every tank of fuel that has ever gone through my car except for a handful put in by someone else, like my mechanic. I can show you the difference between stock RB20 and tuned RB20, stock RB5Neo and tuned, winter and summer fuel blends, winter and summer fuel blends when the ambient temperature is not appropriate for the blend, working O2 sensor, blown O2 sensor, boosting f**k out of it and frightened to boost it because it is pinging, and so on. OK, I probably can't do all that now with 100% clarity - but at the time when any of those things were in event, you could see it in the records. There's 25+ years of simple tank after tank records, so you have to look for landmarks to work out approximately how old any single record is. What's really important is the meta data and that lives in my head.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
×
×
  • Create New...