Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What dyno was it?

On a Dyno logic one, I've seen an R34 GTX-T series 2 get 169rwkw running about 12psi, stock ECU and CES 3" Exhaust (split dumps), auto. A series one auto R34 GT-T with nothing but K&N panel filter, stock boost and an Apexi Cat-back 3" exhaust do 147rwkw. Neither car had front mounts.

Mine has more than just exhaust and boost so I won't post mine.

175.1rwkw with 3" turbo back exhaust & Just Jap 600x300 front mount.

Stock boost & computer, manual box.

edit - Mine seems a little high going by the above numbers... suppose it just comes down the dyno I suppose.... I'd like to think I have a heathy motor :)

Edited by Bluprint

Wow these are some high figures! I was only hoping to get about 170-180rwkw with turboback exhaust, fmic, 13psi and pod.

I just fitted a full exhaust on Sat and I must say the difference is huge. I'll see if I can get a dyno run in for you.

Managed to get 176rwkw with my stock turbo, but the timing was being pulled due to overboost retard. Had I realised exactly what was happeneing at the time would have been able to drop the boost and probably make more power.

Manual Box

3" Split dump/front, 3" Blitz cat back

Pod with heat sheild and standard snorkel

Standard ECU

Standard IC

Stock Boost

2 dyno runs with identical results - 168rwkw

Edited by PAV34

From memory;

100% stock = 147 rwkw

Cat back = 168 rwkw (boost went up 1.5 psi)

Split dump and Magic cat = 183 rwkw (boost went up a little bit more, say 1 psi)

Standard R32GTR intercooler and my own design of 63 mm pipework = no dyno

Power FC, tune and boost up to 10 psi = 205 rwkw

GCG Ball bearing High Flow, 1.5 bar boost, tune + injectors = 248 rwkw

Tomei Poncams, 1.4 bar + tune = 265 rwkw

:) Cheers :laugh:

What dyno was it?

On a Dyno logic one, I've seen an R34 GTX-T series 2 get 169rwkw running about 12psi, stock ECU and CES 3" Exhaust (split dumps), auto. A series one auto R34 GT-T with nothing but K&N panel filter, stock boost and an Apexi Cat-back 3" exhaust do 147rwkw. Neither car had front mounts.

Mine has more than just exhaust and boost so I won't post mine.

Yeah mine was the one with the Apexi cat back and panel filter pulling 147kw atw from a Dyno Logic dyno at our SAU dyno night. Apparently it was reading lower for everyone that had previously dynoed on a Dyno Dynamics...so as SK predicted...with catback...*should* read somewhere closer to 160 for stock with catback only?? :blink:

SK; is your motor stock standard?

Other that the mods above, I also ported it, then volume matched and polished the combustion chambers. I used a standard headgasket with o'rings around the combustion chambers. That's it for when I had it. I sold it 3 years ago, don't know what been done since.

:blink: cheers :)

Shhh n15m0; my car is stock.... :(

Anyways; got off the dyno on Friday with 225.31rwkw @ 10psi of boost... had a boost leak issue (will post up a proper thread about it later today).

Funny thing is that it shoots to 18psi by 4,500rpm - holds till 5,500rpm then slowly drops back to 10psi by 7,200rpm. 1 bar of boost was reached by 3,500rpm. Pulls like a motherF' when the boost kicks in; just not up high :/

New boost controller for me; and maybe some welding!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...