Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What dyno was it?

On a Dyno logic one, I've seen an R34 GTX-T series 2 get 169rwkw running about 12psi, stock ECU and CES 3" Exhaust (split dumps), auto. A series one auto R34 GT-T with nothing but K&N panel filter, stock boost and an Apexi Cat-back 3" exhaust do 147rwkw. Neither car had front mounts.

Mine has more than just exhaust and boost so I won't post mine.

175.1rwkw with 3" turbo back exhaust & Just Jap 600x300 front mount.

Stock boost & computer, manual box.

edit - Mine seems a little high going by the above numbers... suppose it just comes down the dyno I suppose.... I'd like to think I have a heathy motor :)

Edited by Bluprint

Wow these are some high figures! I was only hoping to get about 170-180rwkw with turboback exhaust, fmic, 13psi and pod.

I just fitted a full exhaust on Sat and I must say the difference is huge. I'll see if I can get a dyno run in for you.

Managed to get 176rwkw with my stock turbo, but the timing was being pulled due to overboost retard. Had I realised exactly what was happeneing at the time would have been able to drop the boost and probably make more power.

Manual Box

3" Split dump/front, 3" Blitz cat back

Pod with heat sheild and standard snorkel

Standard ECU

Standard IC

Stock Boost

2 dyno runs with identical results - 168rwkw

Edited by PAV34

From memory;

100% stock = 147 rwkw

Cat back = 168 rwkw (boost went up 1.5 psi)

Split dump and Magic cat = 183 rwkw (boost went up a little bit more, say 1 psi)

Standard R32GTR intercooler and my own design of 63 mm pipework = no dyno

Power FC, tune and boost up to 10 psi = 205 rwkw

GCG Ball bearing High Flow, 1.5 bar boost, tune + injectors = 248 rwkw

Tomei Poncams, 1.4 bar + tune = 265 rwkw

:) Cheers :laugh:

What dyno was it?

On a Dyno logic one, I've seen an R34 GTX-T series 2 get 169rwkw running about 12psi, stock ECU and CES 3" Exhaust (split dumps), auto. A series one auto R34 GT-T with nothing but K&N panel filter, stock boost and an Apexi Cat-back 3" exhaust do 147rwkw. Neither car had front mounts.

Mine has more than just exhaust and boost so I won't post mine.

Yeah mine was the one with the Apexi cat back and panel filter pulling 147kw atw from a Dyno Logic dyno at our SAU dyno night. Apparently it was reading lower for everyone that had previously dynoed on a Dyno Dynamics...so as SK predicted...with catback...*should* read somewhere closer to 160 for stock with catback only?? :blink:

SK; is your motor stock standard?

Other that the mods above, I also ported it, then volume matched and polished the combustion chambers. I used a standard headgasket with o'rings around the combustion chambers. That's it for when I had it. I sold it 3 years ago, don't know what been done since.

:blink: cheers :)

Shhh n15m0; my car is stock.... :(

Anyways; got off the dyno on Friday with 225.31rwkw @ 10psi of boost... had a boost leak issue (will post up a proper thread about it later today).

Funny thing is that it shoots to 18psi by 4,500rpm - holds till 5,500rpm then slowly drops back to 10psi by 7,200rpm. 1 bar of boost was reached by 3,500rpm. Pulls like a motherF' when the boost kicks in; just not up high :/

New boost controller for me; and maybe some welding!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Most of the industry in North America either runs on Siemens or Allen Bradley. I have two redundant S7-1500's on my desk right next to me for simulation. Siemens has been losing ground though since Stuxnet, as cybersecurity is a big thing. In my line of work that is federally regulated, you must by law have a cybersecurity management program in place and its audited and inspected every so often.  I work with Emerson PLC's daily (RX3i's) and have done large biogas/refinery projects with their DCS's. Their PLC's are somewhat OK minus the way they do PLC redundancy (You have to download on both PLC's separately every time you make a change )  As for their DCS's... you'll be limited financially first before anything else stops you. Costs are exorbiant at roughly 10x what it would cost you to do with any other system (e.g AB PAC).  1990's, those suckers are brand new haha! Kraft-Heinz (An old client when I use to work for an ESP) still runs Siemens TI505 PLC's from the mid 80's. Ohh how I don't miss working with those... you could only do a certain number of online downloads until it's "Change" buffer would be full and you would then need to go offline to do a full download. There was no warning of when this was coming up and it generally would happen when you would go in at 2am to make changes before production -_-.     
    • Unfortunately, not only is that not the case, one of the main "Selling points" of safety over comms is they clearly state in writing that there's no need to segregate safety networks from non-safety networks. It always gets intermingled with everything else on an ICS/OT network. 
    • Hello. I have an a31 cefiro but since I am in Turkey we have a CA20S engine. I did some research. Then I found that I can swap with a ca18 but when I heard that it has the similar substructure as the s13. I thought I can swap with an sr20 because the sr20 was used with the s13. So can I easily swap the sr20 on my cefiro or is it difficult? 
    • I used to love stock take. I used to take f**k of a lot of stock. /Rodney Rude.
×
×
  • Create New...