Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Alex, I despise Bendix. Dusty and spongy. RB74 from Racebrakes for the street and some fun stuff.

Marcus, they will never fit under the 16's from my GTSt. Just drop them off to me..... :rofl: Actually I might need them sometime, so let me know the progress report on the car.

Jack, haven't forgotten me have you mate? Cheers

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

By performance are you allowing for consistancy? I agree with what you are saying with the std calipers, but the rotors? GTRs are a big heavy car with a good turn of grunt.

And thinking logically there has to be something to the fact that Nissan gave the R32 V-Spec 324mm rotors. The only real difference in caliper is the step up to differential sized pistons, bot the piston area wasnt overly different. The fact that the R33 and R34 uses 324mm rotors, the N1 GTRs use 324mm rotors etc etc

Well i think thats a decent indicator that even Nissan think the original R32 brakes were a little underdone, whilst the 324 rotors with Brembos is good enough for the cars they hoped would be competitive in Production Racing

So dont think the R32 GTR brakes can do a great job even with good pads etc, do the job yes, but shoudl be pretty high up on the list of things to do if you want to enjoy and go quick at the track. Of course if you only need three laps at a time...i will change my tune

I see your point, I guess my problem is my cars always handle well and, on the handling to power ratio, my leaning is always towards the handling side of the equation. Plus maybe I drive around the corners faster than the average GTR driver, although that might be a bit presumptuous

My personal experience has been that a 300rwkw R32GTR with standard callipers, braided lines, removed backers, fresh Castrol brake fluid, DBA 4000 series slotted rotors and Hawke HT10 pads has sufficient braking capacity to lock up (on demand ) 245/45/17 Yokohama A032R’s. This performance can be sustained for 5-6 flat out laps of Oran Park and 9-10 laps of Eastern Creek. By that stage the tyres are rooted (overheated) and have much more of an effect on the braking performance than the brakes themselves.

It is quite likely that a 500 rwkw GTR on full slicks, with not so good suspension and a G force averse driver would not find the same brake hardware up to scratch. However my suggestion then would be not to spend the money on brakes, but on better suspension and some circuit race driving lessons. I personally feel that the lap times would be vastly superior for the same $ spend.

:P cheers :)

Well they have just finished fitting the brakes and we have taken it for quick test drive, it is a little hard to judge as brakes are not properly bedded in yet, but tryed a few hard stops from around 160kmh in a new industrial estate out the back of my work (again not ideal), but yes it certainly pulls up quickly, only locks the front tyre for a split second as speed slows to around 60kmh then ABS kicks in.

Does it pull up quicker than before....?.......first impressions seem to suggest it does if only cause I was feeling a little light headed after the hard braking due to the De-accelaration!..never really felt that before....still that could also be attributed to the excessive coffee I drink at work! :O

Brakes were a 'pure' bolt on so very easy to install.

Its actually taking them longer to fit the Sparco seats as the factory GTR seats incorporate the runner as part of the seat base, it cannot be removed, and I was hoping to use these in conjunction with a modified bracket to fit the Sparcos....

In regards to the seat, measure the base, and if not too wide you'll probably get away with using Bride rails. It's an easy option, and will sit you lower.

PS I'm gonna need some photo's of the brakes on the car... and some time alone... :O

Alex, I despise Bendix. Dusty and spongy. RB74 from Racebrakes for the street and some fun stuff.

Marcus, they will never fit under the 16's from my GTSt. Just drop them off to me..... ;) Actually I might need them sometime, so let me know the progress report on the car.

Jack, haven't forgotten me have you mate? Cheers

will let you know Geoff - it's getting there... :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
    • Slight segway but the most expensive part of the whole thing which I would have thought would only be required for an engine size/type swap, not a VIV test, is emissions testing.  That's when you get into the big bucks.  I can't remember the exact price now but I got quotes for the GT-R based on swapping to RB30 (not that anyone bothers doing it legally anymore...) and it was around $4500 just for that alone.  The guy that does them manipulates the tune on the vehicle to make sure it passes.  The cheaper option is to book into Kangan Batman Tafe (I think that's where it was) and hire their tester.  Allegedly you're not allowed in there with the car though so not in a position to tweak anything to make sure the vehicle passes.  I'm sure in this day and age of ultra tuneable ECU's you could get the tuner to program a special efficiency (clean) tune that emits the lowest amount of particulates possible that would pass the test.  It might only make 50kW's but as long as it passed who cares!
    • I'm sure he has left signs, or, he is looking down, laughing That's my cunning plan for when I leave, lots of half finished projects, with no rhyme or reason of where I was actually up to, just to keep everyone on their toes
×
×
  • Create New...