Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the two cirlces on my tail lights- one is lit up for tail light,

and the other only when i brake. why dont i have both lit up

all the time like every other skyzer. is this a series 1 thing??

i have never ever seen another like this. someone please

tell me what the dealeo is

the two cirlces on my tail lights- one is lit up for tail light,

and the other only when i brake. why dont i have both lit up

all the time like every other skyzer. is this a series 1 thing??

i have never ever seen another like this. someone please

tell me what the dealeo is

mate i had this when i first got my series 2 33,

after some investigation i found that if you remove the globe of the light that only works when you are braking you prob find a fit of tape on one side just remove it and both will work.

thats what i did anyway.

its not a skyline without the four stove tops lit up :)

hope this helps

Spot on... when the head lights are turned on you should have all 4 cook tops light up. When you apply the break they become brighter... This is for a r33 gts-t

On mine all 4 light up brighter when I brake, which I think is how its meant to be!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...