Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt4 Tskuba(spelling) Times


Butler
 Share

Recommended Posts

tried the amuse s2000 and fark that thing is quick out of the box!!! could only manager a 55.504. tired a wing on the fd but it felt worse, tried to change the suspensiong but still felt like crap. took wing off and tweaked it a bit more and managed a 54.191!!! 53 seconds here we come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

53 seconds here we come.

beatcha to it! I put a wing on my 738bhp '89 GTR - 53.829!

then I decided to try other GTRs to see if any can get more power.

GTR VSpec N1 '93 749bhp 54.003 with wing. haven't tried any others yet.

Also got a Honda NSX '01 with 462bhp and wing to 54.673. Not bad for the power its got. Can't seem to turbo any of the NSX's :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IM A NERD NOW.

51.86 in the koingseggC8XS(whatever it is) how ever u spell it in forza.

does it count?

from a different game on a different platform in a non-JDM car? yeah, no worries! sounds like a fair comparison!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

beatcha to it! I put a wing on my 738bhp '89 GTR - 53.829!

then I decided to try other GTRs to see if any can get more power.

GTR VSpec N1 '93 749bhp 54.003 with wing. haven't tried any others yet.

Mind telling me your set up's for these 2 cars to get these times?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

beatcha to it! I put a wing on my 738bhp '89 GTR - 53.829!

then I decided to try other GTRs to see if any can get more power.

GTR VSpec N1 '93 749bhp 54.003 with wing. haven't tried any others yet.

Also got a Honda NSX '01 with 462bhp and wing to 54.673. Not bad for the power its got. Can't seem to turbo any of the NSX's :rofl:

fark that is quick for a 4wd car! i find that all the 4wd cars i drive have too much understeer to run quick times but now i stand corrected! tried the r34 v2 N1 with about 700ps or something close to that and could only manage a low 55. i think i had the suspension a little too hard for sports tyres but with 12kg spring front and rear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mind telling me your set up's for these 2 cars to get these times?

here you go. try them out and see how you go...

both have Sport Soft tyres of course. I won't list every part I bought because its enough typing already, just assume its done unless I specifically say it isn't. I never use NOS, and have never used the weight balance settings either - both of those feel like cheating...

Nissan Skyline GTR '89

738bhp/1215kg

just fully modify the engine (no NOS) Turbine Kit: Original

get all the driveline bits (triple clutch, race flywheel, carbon driveshaft) except:

LSD: standard (changing them on GTR makes them understeer like a dog)

AYC Controller: none

Variable Centre diff: none

Weight Reduction: Stage 3, no cage (incr rigidity), no body refresher plan

Brake Controller: none

SETTINGS:

Suspension: Original

spring rate: 6.3 7.8

ride height: 74 74

damper: 9 9

camber: 3.2 0.8

toe: -2 0

stabiliser: 3 3

Transmission: Fully Customisable

auto setting 21

2.476 1.683 1.245 0.971 0.773 final drive 4.111

Downforce: 30 32

NISSAN Skyline GTR VSpec N1 '93

749bhp/1249kg

fully mod engine with no NOS, Turbine Kit: Original

get all the driveline bits (triple clutch, race flywheel, carbon driveshaft) except:

LSD: standard (changing them on GTR makes them understeer like a dog)

AYC Controller: none

Variable Centre diff: none

Weight Reduction: Stage 3, with cage (increase rigidity), and body refresher plan.

SETTINGS:

Suspension:Original

spring rate: 8 10

ride height: 76 76

damper: 8 8

camber: 3.2 0.8

toe: 0 0

stabiliser: 4 4

Transmission: Fully Customisable

auto setting 10

3.355 2.316 1.716 1.331 1.081 0.919 final drive 4.111

Downforce: 30 28

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here you go. try them out and see how you go...

both have Sport Soft tyres of course. I won't list every part I bought because its enough typing already, just assume its done unless I specifically say it isn't. I never use NOS, and have never used the weight balance settings either - both of those feel like cheating...

Nissan Skyline GTR '89

738bhp/1215kg

just fully modify the engine (no NOS) Turbine Kit: Original

get all the driveline bits (triple clutch, race flywheel, carbon driveshaft) except:

LSD: standard (changing them on GTR makes them understeer like a dog)

AYC Controller: none

Variable Centre diff: none

Weight Reduction: Stage 3, no cage (incr rigidity), no body refresher plan

Brake Controller: none

SETTINGS:

Suspension: Original

spring rate: 6.3 7.8

ride height: 74 74

damper: 9 9

camber: 3.2 0.8

toe: -2 0

stabiliser: 3 3

Transmission: Fully Customisable

auto setting 21

2.476 1.683 1.245 0.971 0.773 final drive 4.111

Downforce: 30 32

NISSAN Skyline GTR VSpec N1 '93

749bhp/1249kg

fully mod engine with no NOS, Turbine Kit: Original

get all the driveline bits (triple clutch, race flywheel, carbon driveshaft) except:

LSD: standard (changing them on GTR makes them understeer like a dog)

AYC Controller: none

Variable Centre diff: none

Weight Reduction: Stage 3, with cage (increase rigidity), and body refresher plan.

SETTINGS:

Suspension:Original

spring rate: 8 10

ride height: 76 76

damper: 8 8

camber: 3.2 0.8

toe: 0 0

stabiliser: 4 4

Transmission: Fully Customisable

auto setting 10

3.355 2.316 1.716 1.331 1.081 0.919 final drive 4.111

Downforce: 30 28

wow you run really soft suspension. on the rx7 i run 12 and 10 spring and 10 and 9 damper. Will have to try no lsd in the gtr and see how i go. got a bit closer to the 53 last night, 54.087! anyone tried messing with the brake bias with any success?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

been trying other GTR's and found a winner- R34 GTR 53.007!

A 52 should be possible but it will have to be a pretty damn good lap. not an easy car to drive though - it needs the throttle fed in progressively out of corners and how well you do that makes or breaks the lap time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think we have a winner!!!!

52.098!!!!!!!!!!!! on sports tyres!!!!! in a rear wheel drive car!!!!!

the gillet vertigo race car '04. mod it full up, leave all the setting stock except for the gear ratios at about 11, traction control at 3, and no NOS

and i'd can say for sure that 51's are possible with this car. i have been faster to the second corner than the ghost of that time, but f**k up the entry and run too wide, or cut to sharp and hit the ripple strip.

Edited by mad082
Link to comment
Share on other sites

other people have done laps in non jap cars. and i class the vertigo in the same class as any car bought from a tuning company (not original manufacturer).

the game specifies if it is a race car in the car's title - eg "Gillet Vertigo Race Car". Its in the same class as the other race cars in the game. You won't find "race car" in the title of any of the other cars we've used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Right.  I'll try my best at a concise "bring you up to speed" on stuff that may be missing here - obviously open to questions or further input from others as relevant. Here's a datalog from a responsive turbo setup with electronic boost control being used a bit, to keep it simple I've marked 3 points of interest.  All of these charts are on the same time scale on the X-axis, so you can reference what engine rpm is doing in the top graph, boost and EMAP (exhaust backpressure) in the second graph, and turbo rpm in the bottom graph. A) The turbo gets it's power from exhaust gas, and pumping air takes work.  As a result you can't just spin a turbo with a fixed amount of exhaust energy and expect it to keep spooling - the bigger the turbo (ie, the more air it can push) the more exhaust energy you need to drive it.   The most obvious ways of getting more exhaust energy are by adding displacement, adding boost, or adding rpm - but as you add any of these the turbo also needs to do a bit more work so there is a big balance of these things needed to even get to your target boost and sometimes that's not even possible. What you can see in step "A" is that there isn't enough engine rpm or boost to reach the level we want, so this is where "lag" is.  The dyno run continues and rpm increases, which gives enough energy to increase boost, which helps spool  the turbine speed up even more - so you can see that the rate that the boost (and turbo speed) are starting to ramp up faster than the engine rpm is, so turbo is really starting to wake up as the graph gets closer to point B....   B) At this point we've been able to reach the boost that is actually desired at this point.   To stop the boost from going further than this the wastegate will open and bypass gas past the turbine, meaning it doesn't continue accelerating at the point it was before but instead carry on at a more progressive rate which matches what the engine needs.   The wastegate will have a spring in it which is rated to a specific pressure where it will start bypassing, but electronic boost control (managed by the ECU) can adjust how much pressure the spring sees in order to allow some tunability on how much boost the wastegate actually sees, and therefore how much exhaust it bypasses.   The tune in this case stops boost from ramping up HARD at around 21-22psi just before 4000rpm, then as the rpm continue it allows boost to continue up to around 25psi higher in the rpm.   You can see the turbo speed fairly steadily increases through the rpm to ensure it's keeping up with the increasing airflow demand due to the engine speed being higher and boost being pretty steady.   If the boost dropped off after a point then you may see the turbo speed level off or even drop.   C) You can see that despite the boost pressure staying pretty flat here, the exhaust pressure is steadily increasing and at this stage has overtaken boost pressure.   This isn't unusual, and is largely as a result of the increasing energy needed by the turbo to pump more and more air to suit the needs of the engine as it revs out further.   There are a bunch of variables in regards to how much back pressure there will be on a given turbo etc, but its one of the factors we manage when sizing and tuning a turbo setup.   When exhaust back pressure starts exceeding boost pressure you will eventually start seeing signs that the turbo is running out, the engine gets less keen to make more power and it gets harder to raise boost further. In this case it's a fairly acceptable compromise for the power level (around 630kw on a 3litre engine with full boost by 4000rpm), but you'd not want to push it a lot harder than this.  The maximum speed rated for the compressor wheel on this setup is around 125,000rpm so you can see its starting to get close on that side as well - I feel like this kind of illustrates some of the turbo related things we both decide on how far to push, and are also limited to how far we can push depending on the parts combination. Hope this helps more than it confuses things  
    • For that influx of Spammers we had I made no pic posting and no PM's for first ten posts. This is group based and I've manually updated @Beanie to the Members group which will open up the images and PM's. 
    • Thx for the reassuring reply. I’ve got above legal clearance  going in for roadworthy Friday… fingers crossed it’s keeping me awake  bloody nanny state 
    • I was actually going to try and dig out a datalog with turbine speed and EMAP haha
    • Wait until @Lithium posts a compressor map and tries to explain what's going on. There is a strong possibility that the OP lives in a digital world and is not comfortable with analogue machines. A turbo is just about as analogue as it gets, with plenty of non-linear behaviours added in on top. Most of us who think we know how they work are actually only getting by on 2nd and 3rd order mental models that abstract away from the actual physics and bring it back to the sort of kindergarten level concepts we can hold in our heads. This is important when you need to hold 10 such concepts in your head at the same time. You need to reduce the complexity of the individual concepts to allow them to be simultaneously held and manipulated. Too much complexity in the base models makes it very difficult to make them work with each other mentally.
×
×
  • Create New...