Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt4 Tskuba(spelling) Times


Butler
 Share

Recommended Posts

tried the amuse s2000 and fark that thing is quick out of the box!!! could only manager a 55.504. tired a wing on the fd but it felt worse, tried to change the suspensiong but still felt like crap. took wing off and tweaked it a bit more and managed a 54.191!!! 53 seconds here we come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

53 seconds here we come.

beatcha to it! I put a wing on my 738bhp '89 GTR - 53.829!

then I decided to try other GTRs to see if any can get more power.

GTR VSpec N1 '93 749bhp 54.003 with wing. haven't tried any others yet.

Also got a Honda NSX '01 with 462bhp and wing to 54.673. Not bad for the power its got. Can't seem to turbo any of the NSX's :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IM A NERD NOW.

51.86 in the koingseggC8XS(whatever it is) how ever u spell it in forza.

does it count?

from a different game on a different platform in a non-JDM car? yeah, no worries! sounds like a fair comparison!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

beatcha to it! I put a wing on my 738bhp '89 GTR - 53.829!

then I decided to try other GTRs to see if any can get more power.

GTR VSpec N1 '93 749bhp 54.003 with wing. haven't tried any others yet.

Mind telling me your set up's for these 2 cars to get these times?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

beatcha to it! I put a wing on my 738bhp '89 GTR - 53.829!

then I decided to try other GTRs to see if any can get more power.

GTR VSpec N1 '93 749bhp 54.003 with wing. haven't tried any others yet.

Also got a Honda NSX '01 with 462bhp and wing to 54.673. Not bad for the power its got. Can't seem to turbo any of the NSX's :rofl:

fark that is quick for a 4wd car! i find that all the 4wd cars i drive have too much understeer to run quick times but now i stand corrected! tried the r34 v2 N1 with about 700ps or something close to that and could only manage a low 55. i think i had the suspension a little too hard for sports tyres but with 12kg spring front and rear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mind telling me your set up's for these 2 cars to get these times?

here you go. try them out and see how you go...

both have Sport Soft tyres of course. I won't list every part I bought because its enough typing already, just assume its done unless I specifically say it isn't. I never use NOS, and have never used the weight balance settings either - both of those feel like cheating...

Nissan Skyline GTR '89

738bhp/1215kg

just fully modify the engine (no NOS) Turbine Kit: Original

get all the driveline bits (triple clutch, race flywheel, carbon driveshaft) except:

LSD: standard (changing them on GTR makes them understeer like a dog)

AYC Controller: none

Variable Centre diff: none

Weight Reduction: Stage 3, no cage (incr rigidity), no body refresher plan

Brake Controller: none

SETTINGS:

Suspension: Original

spring rate: 6.3 7.8

ride height: 74 74

damper: 9 9

camber: 3.2 0.8

toe: -2 0

stabiliser: 3 3

Transmission: Fully Customisable

auto setting 21

2.476 1.683 1.245 0.971 0.773 final drive 4.111

Downforce: 30 32

NISSAN Skyline GTR VSpec N1 '93

749bhp/1249kg

fully mod engine with no NOS, Turbine Kit: Original

get all the driveline bits (triple clutch, race flywheel, carbon driveshaft) except:

LSD: standard (changing them on GTR makes them understeer like a dog)

AYC Controller: none

Variable Centre diff: none

Weight Reduction: Stage 3, with cage (increase rigidity), and body refresher plan.

SETTINGS:

Suspension:Original

spring rate: 8 10

ride height: 76 76

damper: 8 8

camber: 3.2 0.8

toe: 0 0

stabiliser: 4 4

Transmission: Fully Customisable

auto setting 10

3.355 2.316 1.716 1.331 1.081 0.919 final drive 4.111

Downforce: 30 28

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here you go. try them out and see how you go...

both have Sport Soft tyres of course. I won't list every part I bought because its enough typing already, just assume its done unless I specifically say it isn't. I never use NOS, and have never used the weight balance settings either - both of those feel like cheating...

Nissan Skyline GTR '89

738bhp/1215kg

just fully modify the engine (no NOS) Turbine Kit: Original

get all the driveline bits (triple clutch, race flywheel, carbon driveshaft) except:

LSD: standard (changing them on GTR makes them understeer like a dog)

AYC Controller: none

Variable Centre diff: none

Weight Reduction: Stage 3, no cage (incr rigidity), no body refresher plan

Brake Controller: none

SETTINGS:

Suspension: Original

spring rate: 6.3 7.8

ride height: 74 74

damper: 9 9

camber: 3.2 0.8

toe: -2 0

stabiliser: 3 3

Transmission: Fully Customisable

auto setting 21

2.476 1.683 1.245 0.971 0.773 final drive 4.111

Downforce: 30 32

NISSAN Skyline GTR VSpec N1 '93

749bhp/1249kg

fully mod engine with no NOS, Turbine Kit: Original

get all the driveline bits (triple clutch, race flywheel, carbon driveshaft) except:

LSD: standard (changing them on GTR makes them understeer like a dog)

AYC Controller: none

Variable Centre diff: none

Weight Reduction: Stage 3, with cage (increase rigidity), and body refresher plan.

SETTINGS:

Suspension:Original

spring rate: 8 10

ride height: 76 76

damper: 8 8

camber: 3.2 0.8

toe: 0 0

stabiliser: 4 4

Transmission: Fully Customisable

auto setting 10

3.355 2.316 1.716 1.331 1.081 0.919 final drive 4.111

Downforce: 30 28

wow you run really soft suspension. on the rx7 i run 12 and 10 spring and 10 and 9 damper. Will have to try no lsd in the gtr and see how i go. got a bit closer to the 53 last night, 54.087! anyone tried messing with the brake bias with any success?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

been trying other GTR's and found a winner- R34 GTR 53.007!

A 52 should be possible but it will have to be a pretty damn good lap. not an easy car to drive though - it needs the throttle fed in progressively out of corners and how well you do that makes or breaks the lap time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think we have a winner!!!!

52.098!!!!!!!!!!!! on sports tyres!!!!! in a rear wheel drive car!!!!!

the gillet vertigo race car '04. mod it full up, leave all the setting stock except for the gear ratios at about 11, traction control at 3, and no NOS

and i'd can say for sure that 51's are possible with this car. i have been faster to the second corner than the ghost of that time, but f**k up the entry and run too wide, or cut to sharp and hit the ripple strip.

Edited by mad082
Link to comment
Share on other sites

other people have done laps in non jap cars. and i class the vertigo in the same class as any car bought from a tuning company (not original manufacturer).

the game specifies if it is a race car in the car's title - eg "Gillet Vertigo Race Car". Its in the same class as the other race cars in the game. You won't find "race car" in the title of any of the other cars we've used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thx for the reassuring reply. I’ve got above legal clearance  going in for roadworthy Friday… fingers crossed it’s keeping me awake  bloody nanny state 
    • I was actually going to try and dig out a datalog with turbine speed and EMAP haha
    • Wait until @Lithium posts a compressor map and tries to explain what's going on. There is a strong possibility that the OP lives in a digital world and is not comfortable with analogue machines. A turbo is just about as analogue as it gets, with plenty of non-linear behaviours added in on top. Most of us who think we know how they work are actually only getting by on 2nd and 3rd order mental models that abstract away from the actual physics and bring it back to the sort of kindergarten level concepts we can hold in our heads. This is important when you need to hold 10 such concepts in your head at the same time. You need to reduce the complexity of the individual concepts to allow them to be simultaneously held and manipulated. Too much complexity in the base models makes it very difficult to make them work with each other mentally.
    • It could be. It might not be. It is impossible to know without context by asking the owner or the tuner on the day and knowing what they were doing/not doing/attempting to do. You said earlier this is hard to understand because to your mind, a turbo is at full speed when it hits its spike. This is not true. The turbos actual speed is defined by how much air is being forced through it via the exhaust, unless you control it. The spike you are seeing at ~whatever RPM it 'spools' at, is where boost control is starting. If there were no boost control the turbo absolutely would be spinning much faster at 7000rpm than 3000rpm, every single time, on every single engine. Boost control keeps the boost controlled within the limits you ideally want. If it were uncontrolled you would have two scenarios 1) You have a turbo that hits peak RPM and CFM (not boost) at the redline of the engine. This would work, but most people want more boost earlier. 2) You have a turbo that hits peak RPM well before the redline of the engine (say, 3500), and you explode the turbo by redlining the engine. (say, 7000rpm). If you don't want exploding things, or lag, you design a turbo system to come on when you want the boost to be useful, and then not overspin itself into oblivion by using some form of boost control, to control the boost pressure accordingly.
    • Yep. >10 posts required. Prank can relax that for individuals when required.
×
×
  • Create New...