Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt4 Tskuba(spelling) Times


Butler
 Share

Recommended Posts

tried the amuse s2000 and fark that thing is quick out of the box!!! could only manager a 55.504. tired a wing on the fd but it felt worse, tried to change the suspensiong but still felt like crap. took wing off and tweaked it a bit more and managed a 54.191!!! 53 seconds here we come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

53 seconds here we come.

beatcha to it! I put a wing on my 738bhp '89 GTR - 53.829!

then I decided to try other GTRs to see if any can get more power.

GTR VSpec N1 '93 749bhp 54.003 with wing. haven't tried any others yet.

Also got a Honda NSX '01 with 462bhp and wing to 54.673. Not bad for the power its got. Can't seem to turbo any of the NSX's :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IM A NERD NOW.

51.86 in the koingseggC8XS(whatever it is) how ever u spell it in forza.

does it count?

from a different game on a different platform in a non-JDM car? yeah, no worries! sounds like a fair comparison!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

beatcha to it! I put a wing on my 738bhp '89 GTR - 53.829!

then I decided to try other GTRs to see if any can get more power.

GTR VSpec N1 '93 749bhp 54.003 with wing. haven't tried any others yet.

Mind telling me your set up's for these 2 cars to get these times?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

beatcha to it! I put a wing on my 738bhp '89 GTR - 53.829!

then I decided to try other GTRs to see if any can get more power.

GTR VSpec N1 '93 749bhp 54.003 with wing. haven't tried any others yet.

Also got a Honda NSX '01 with 462bhp and wing to 54.673. Not bad for the power its got. Can't seem to turbo any of the NSX's :rofl:

fark that is quick for a 4wd car! i find that all the 4wd cars i drive have too much understeer to run quick times but now i stand corrected! tried the r34 v2 N1 with about 700ps or something close to that and could only manage a low 55. i think i had the suspension a little too hard for sports tyres but with 12kg spring front and rear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mind telling me your set up's for these 2 cars to get these times?

here you go. try them out and see how you go...

both have Sport Soft tyres of course. I won't list every part I bought because its enough typing already, just assume its done unless I specifically say it isn't. I never use NOS, and have never used the weight balance settings either - both of those feel like cheating...

Nissan Skyline GTR '89

738bhp/1215kg

just fully modify the engine (no NOS) Turbine Kit: Original

get all the driveline bits (triple clutch, race flywheel, carbon driveshaft) except:

LSD: standard (changing them on GTR makes them understeer like a dog)

AYC Controller: none

Variable Centre diff: none

Weight Reduction: Stage 3, no cage (incr rigidity), no body refresher plan

Brake Controller: none

SETTINGS:

Suspension: Original

spring rate: 6.3 7.8

ride height: 74 74

damper: 9 9

camber: 3.2 0.8

toe: -2 0

stabiliser: 3 3

Transmission: Fully Customisable

auto setting 21

2.476 1.683 1.245 0.971 0.773 final drive 4.111

Downforce: 30 32

NISSAN Skyline GTR VSpec N1 '93

749bhp/1249kg

fully mod engine with no NOS, Turbine Kit: Original

get all the driveline bits (triple clutch, race flywheel, carbon driveshaft) except:

LSD: standard (changing them on GTR makes them understeer like a dog)

AYC Controller: none

Variable Centre diff: none

Weight Reduction: Stage 3, with cage (increase rigidity), and body refresher plan.

SETTINGS:

Suspension:Original

spring rate: 8 10

ride height: 76 76

damper: 8 8

camber: 3.2 0.8

toe: 0 0

stabiliser: 4 4

Transmission: Fully Customisable

auto setting 10

3.355 2.316 1.716 1.331 1.081 0.919 final drive 4.111

Downforce: 30 28

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here you go. try them out and see how you go...

both have Sport Soft tyres of course. I won't list every part I bought because its enough typing already, just assume its done unless I specifically say it isn't. I never use NOS, and have never used the weight balance settings either - both of those feel like cheating...

Nissan Skyline GTR '89

738bhp/1215kg

just fully modify the engine (no NOS) Turbine Kit: Original

get all the driveline bits (triple clutch, race flywheel, carbon driveshaft) except:

LSD: standard (changing them on GTR makes them understeer like a dog)

AYC Controller: none

Variable Centre diff: none

Weight Reduction: Stage 3, no cage (incr rigidity), no body refresher plan

Brake Controller: none

SETTINGS:

Suspension: Original

spring rate: 6.3 7.8

ride height: 74 74

damper: 9 9

camber: 3.2 0.8

toe: -2 0

stabiliser: 3 3

Transmission: Fully Customisable

auto setting 21

2.476 1.683 1.245 0.971 0.773 final drive 4.111

Downforce: 30 32

NISSAN Skyline GTR VSpec N1 '93

749bhp/1249kg

fully mod engine with no NOS, Turbine Kit: Original

get all the driveline bits (triple clutch, race flywheel, carbon driveshaft) except:

LSD: standard (changing them on GTR makes them understeer like a dog)

AYC Controller: none

Variable Centre diff: none

Weight Reduction: Stage 3, with cage (increase rigidity), and body refresher plan.

SETTINGS:

Suspension:Original

spring rate: 8 10

ride height: 76 76

damper: 8 8

camber: 3.2 0.8

toe: 0 0

stabiliser: 4 4

Transmission: Fully Customisable

auto setting 10

3.355 2.316 1.716 1.331 1.081 0.919 final drive 4.111

Downforce: 30 28

wow you run really soft suspension. on the rx7 i run 12 and 10 spring and 10 and 9 damper. Will have to try no lsd in the gtr and see how i go. got a bit closer to the 53 last night, 54.087! anyone tried messing with the brake bias with any success?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

been trying other GTR's and found a winner- R34 GTR 53.007!

A 52 should be possible but it will have to be a pretty damn good lap. not an easy car to drive though - it needs the throttle fed in progressively out of corners and how well you do that makes or breaks the lap time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think we have a winner!!!!

52.098!!!!!!!!!!!! on sports tyres!!!!! in a rear wheel drive car!!!!!

the gillet vertigo race car '04. mod it full up, leave all the setting stock except for the gear ratios at about 11, traction control at 3, and no NOS

and i'd can say for sure that 51's are possible with this car. i have been faster to the second corner than the ghost of that time, but f**k up the entry and run too wide, or cut to sharp and hit the ripple strip.

Edited by mad082
Link to comment
Share on other sites

other people have done laps in non jap cars. and i class the vertigo in the same class as any car bought from a tuning company (not original manufacturer).

the game specifies if it is a race car in the car's title - eg "Gillet Vertigo Race Car". Its in the same class as the other race cars in the game. You won't find "race car" in the title of any of the other cars we've used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lots of this, and in older cars, AC is generally controlled by the AC knobs and programming, and the ECU reacts to the load. Modern cars, the ECU controls kicking the AC on/off at the AC systems request so it can be prepared for the engagement/disengagement.
    • Sadly, it won't happen. The AC controls in our cars are essentially on-off. Whereas the AC in new stuff is more a case of variable displacement compressors giving infinitely variable output.
    • I don't think anyone did. But it still made me consider. For me personally it wasn't clear whether the AC experience in my car was shit because it is an old system, or because it wasn't maintained. Looks like it may have just been the latter. I see some more modern setup being sold as an upgrade and I wonder whether it would make it drive like AC in a modern car. Where you don't really hear it or notice it. But maybe that's asking for too much as well.   Haha, stick it in a Nissan Cube and you end up with a driveable fridge I'm not doubting your experience. Just thought it was interesting to hear the AC technician's thoughts on it.  
    • Guess I should be hunting down one of these big ol ford units then for max flow ....  I've had fresh gas in mine and it was never as cold as it is now . The compressor could have been trash though, like I said I am one example with a bunch of unknowns. 
    • I don't know if anyone was seriously suggesting a retrofit of an Echo compressor in place of a more-or-less working original comp. You'd have to change the hoses at the bare minimum to do so, and that will definitely add significant cost. I had to get my hoses modded when I did the engine transplant and chose to use the Neo's AC over the even older R32 comp. That was startlingly more expensive than expected for what looks like a simple welding job, and a massive pain in the arse when it turned to have a pinhole leak in the weld too. The Frenchie's kit is for people who have next to nothing of the original system or have more than that but some of it is a bit shit and better off thrown away than salvaged. If you've got 90% of the system, you just patch it up. Mine is currently degassed because it apparently has a big leak somewhere. If I find it is the compressor, I will be looking to take my spare comp to a shop to assess and/or recondition, rather than contemplating a retrofit to anything off-brand.
×
×
  • Create New...