Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

if god forbid one day u smash your car i hope noone gives you sympathy either.

edit: do some sums on insurance for younger drivers and you will see that its not an irresponsible thing NOT to insure your performance car.

What he has said is true, if you can't afford the insurance you can't afford the car. There is no excuse mate.

What he has said is true, if you can't afford the insurance you can't afford the car. There is no excuse mate.

what if you can afford it and you choose not to? that is my point. and i think people are either one way or the other on this issue so i know there is probably not much point arguing this....

what if you can afford it and you choose not to? that is my point.

Simple.. Your an idiot..

I see my chances of an at fault smash.. non-exsistent.. yet i still have insurance

With all the other dicks on the road.. including Un-insured people :D the chances of someone else damaging/stealing my car are high

FARRRRRRRRRRK!@!!!@@@! do an insurance job just say your were driving.

what are they going to say? no you wernt?

i was in a really bad car crash 2 years ago and the damage on your car looks alot worse then mine, thank f**k your alright. Unfortunatly the outcome was different for my crash =/

So, want to sell the wreck mate???

Let me give you an example of why full comp isnt worth it for young drivers.

1997 Nissan Stagea, modified exhaust, turbo, suspension, intercooler, ebc and ecu, $4300 per annum and 800+1200$ excess for a 18/19 year old driver/owner.

Import STOCK AS A ROCK Stagea, 10k landed AND complied.

Replace all the mods and sell parts from the wreck, ends up about the same as having paid 2 years of insurance.

I had a stack, that night cost me ~5k, BUT i would have paid $4300 x 2 + $800 + $1200 if i had insurance.....

Also FYI, I could easily afford that 4.5k per annum it really wouldnt put a dent in my pocket, I just dont think see there being a point when that premium+excess is more than half of the cost to import/comply another one.

So if you dont get insurance, its not because you cant afford it full stop.

Now the car is fixed, Ive got about $24,000 worth of plans for it to be done over the next few months, and guess what, I am not going to get full comp again. Simply put, I just dont think anyone will insure me, and if they do, there will EASILY be something on the car that they can deny me a claim for, so woohoo, wasted money paying premiums to have dishonored claims!

If I was an old guy, sure, id get full comp. My parents pay like $400 a year for a 2001 Astra full comp and the excess is $400 too, thats value, but sorry, premiums of ~5k and excess of ~2k is just shooting up real high there on the "rip-off-o-meter"

I don't think the argument is about not having comprehensive insurance, but more about having no insurance at all!

i.e. no third party, fire and theft.

I don't care if you decide not to have full comprehensive thats your choice, but if you are driving around without at least third party then you are nothing but a menace.

(not meant at anyone in particular, only those without third party)

Let me give you an example of why full comp isnt worth it for young drivers.

1997 Nissan Stagea, modified exhaust, turbo, suspension, intercooler, ebc and ecu, $4300 per annum and 800+1200$ excess for a 18/19 year old driver/owner.

This is where your example falls down - 18 year old with a modified turbo import? Of course the premia would be insane.

I had a stack, that night cost me ~5k, BUT i would have paid $4300 x 2 + $800 + $1200 if i had insurance.....

$5K? OK, now let's say you hit a BMW Series 7. Not even the top of the line one. That's the ugly side of $200K. Now let's say the passenger was pregnant. The passenger and unborn child die in the crash. The driver is incapacitated for life.

That's an awful lot of Stagea parts.

Chris Rock summed it up best, they should call it "In case shit". I can understand the side of not wanting to pay such high prices, but "in case shit happens", I don't want to be caught out of it paying for an empty spot in my driveway, paying for someone elses car because I was irresponsible or paying money off for 10 years with nothing to show for it.....

As for the other topic brought up anyone with no insurance at all should be belted across the face with a large trout.

So, want to sell the wreck mate???

Let me give you an example of why full comp isnt worth it for young drivers.

1997 Nissan Stagea, modified exhaust, turbo, suspension, intercooler, ebc and ecu, $4300 per annum and 800+1200$ excess for a 18/19 year old driver/owner.

Import STOCK AS A ROCK Stagea, 10k landed AND complied.

Replace all the mods and sell parts from the wreck, ends up about the same as having paid 2 years of insurance.

I had a stack, that night cost me ~5k, BUT i would have paid $4300 x 2 + $800 + $1200 if i had insurance.....

Also FYI, I could easily afford that 4.5k per annum it really wouldnt put a dent in my pocket, I just dont think see there being a point when that premium+excess is more than half of the cost to import/comply another one.

So if you dont get insurance, its not because you cant afford it full stop.

Now the car is fixed, Ive got about $24,000 worth of plans for it to be done over the next few months, and guess what, I am not going to get full comp again. Simply put, I just dont think anyone will insure me, and if they do, there will EASILY be something on the car that they can deny me a claim for, so woohoo, wasted money paying premiums to have dishonored claims!

If I was an old guy, sure, id get full comp. My parents pay like $400 a year for a 2001 Astra full comp and the excess is $400 too, thats value, but sorry, premiums of ~5k and excess of ~2k is just shooting up real high there on the "rip-off-o-meter"

lol you're getting owned on those quotes

$1700 a year, full comp, $25k agreed value, 20 years old, unlimited mods, $900 excess.

:)

  • 4 months later...
This is where your example falls down - 18 year old with a modified turbo import? Of course the premia would be insane.

$5K? OK, now let's say you hit a BMW Series 7. Not even the top of the line one. That's the ugly side of $200K. Now let's say the passenger was pregnant. The passenger and unborn child die in the crash. The driver is incapacitated for life.

That's an awful lot of Stagea parts.

Compulsary third party insurance covers the death of third party victims.

Dont need full comp to cover other property. So that BMW Series 7 you crashed into can be covered by cheap as chips (relatively) third part property insurance (dont know what the limit is tho)

Full comp is not needed unless you want to cover your own car. Everything else is covered by the two abovementioned third party insurances.

My datto....hahahahah, full insurance? I pay more in a year than the cars worth. Fact is, accidents rarely happen. They happen more when youre young and dumb and when you drive like a dickhead (and there are too many who do).

If full comp is worth more than the car after two years, its not worth it. Drive safely and be it so that accidents rarely happen, then the two 3rd party insurances have you covered well with probablity on your side.

Edited by 180bfj20det
Compulsary third party insurance covers the death of third party victims.

Dont need full comp to cover other property. So that BMW Series 7 you crashed into can be covered by cheap as chips (relatively) third part property insurance (dont know what the limit is tho)

Full comp is not needed unless you want to cover your own car. Everything else is covered by the two abovementioned third party insurances.

Exactly.

Some people in this thread that are getting really amped up can't seem to differentiate different types of Insurance. Full comprehensive? As long as the guy had Third party property damage insurance then nobody is in a position to abuse or bag the crap out of him.

Not to mention even with full comprehensive insurance his mate driving most likely wouldn't be covered anyway.

INSURANCE Right?!? I am 32 never had a claim on insurance in the past and rang shannons for a quote on insuring my new (new to me ) 32 GTR before I even get a chance to tell the guy my age or anything else he asks if I have owned a skyline before, after I say no he says unless I can prove a history of owning performance cars they would be unable to insure me. WHAT TH f*k was all I could think as the guy then hung up on me after saying some shit like ring us back after 12 months of ownership.

Then they would probly knock back any calims coz a modified anything anyway.

Insurance is a rip off.

Buy an alarm and try not to wreck it what else can ya do.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
×
×
  • Create New...