Jump to content
SAU Community

Love It Or Hate It?


chops
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yea this things going to be an absolute monster and apparently they're trying to hit the drift scene with it according to the HPI magazine the photo was in. They were saying something about looking to hit around 400+rwkw mark and who knows how much torque it'll have... Its good to see something different every now and again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oops...just presumed. The engine bays are quite alike, only noticeable difference I can tell is the position of the two plugged holes on the drivers side strut tower.

Are you kidding me, what the R34 lights dont give it away that it is infact an R34.....uses a GTR shell, and is built impeccably, the boys have not screwed around, this car is gonna munch tyres like nothing. A semi-worked 5.7ltr Ls1, twin turbo's and custom ASE intercooler, radiator and oil cooler setup.

Plus a totally original bodykit thats gonna make you blow all over grandma's skirt, just wait till this thing goes public

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you kidding me, what the R34 lights dont give it away that it is infact an R34.....uses a GTR shell....
Like I said I presumed. This thread was made not so long after Autosalon & there were a couple R33's with R34 fronts & thought George might have followed the trend when I first saw it with the aftermarket kit. Also, a 2door R34 isn't the most obvious platform for drifting compared to a R33 or a 4door Skyline.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Ahhh nice photos there chops me laddy, I walked into that BP where Theo and George were filling up last sunday, walked out to see that, and asked was that it...... as in the first time it's seen the road, and he said yup this is it! I was rather gob smacked! Now that is THE BEST 34 I HAVE EVER SEEN!!!! How Jap touring car does it look? Just awsome!

And not too mention that it really should be a weapon on the drift circuit with the LS under the hood, and a chassis that can handle!

Edited by Deluxe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think i need new jocks... :huh:

LOL :laugh: I wasn't expecting it to look this good, i saw it in the HPI mag and it was just a shell with pumped rear guards and the motor sitting in... looks absolutely killa!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I would go cut bellhousing over that monstrosity of a flywheel all day, every day. It puts a lot more mass further from the last main bearing. I've had nothing but problems with Collins in the past and refuse to ever buy their products again. I would not trust anything they tell you. He's playing his salesman card.  I'm currently at 640whp on a mustang dyno (~770bhp) with the intentions of running E85 and a lot more power this upcoming spring. Cheers, 
    • Nah, it's not the reduced knock margin. It is a direct mechanical effect of having to initiate the combustion earlier, while the piston is still rising, which starts to exert combustion pressure on the rising piston earlier, making the rest of the engine work harder to finish driving the piston up to TDC where the combustion pressure stops being a negative and starts being a positive. Your modern engine that only needs ~10° to make MBT doesn't waste the other 10 or so degrees of crank rotation. That's almost all of it. The difference in knock margin might go either way. Remember that modern engines to which you are currently comparing the long tractor engine (the RB) are now running super high compression, direct injection, tricky cam control and maybe even cylinder pressure sensors. You're not comparing apples with other fruit. It's apples and sea weed, or some other evolutionarily primitive vegetation. And remember, squish only really comes into play at the very end of the stroke. It certainly does good things, but it is not the biggest contributor to what's going on. It is quite possibly much less important in 4 valve head than 2 valvers also, because there is so much less squish available to a 4 valve anyway.
    • Food for thought, a longer stroke motor would need less ignition timing vs. a shorter stroke motor requiring more ignition timing.
    • Thanks Duncan, HART is only 10 mins from me (I did my bike license there), it'd be awesome if it ran these types of things.  Sutton Road does look good and they take fewer cars than SMSP which is good.  Surely you have enough land to lay a few million tonnes of concrete and some sprinklers D? 
    • I thought an engine that needs more ignition timing to make power is going to result in less power due to reduced knock margin? More time for the combustion to propagate -> more time for it to heat up the rest of the mix to detonation.
×
×
  • Create New...