Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

can't answer your question but.......

both put together i'd still choose the one in your sig anyday, everyday. :)

yeah thats a very special "Skyfrine" :yes:

haha those 4 red cooking stoves at the back mean = very f**king fast in either way :D

See the stoves... beware!! hah

So you cant drive it on the road?

Pretty sure I read in HPI that it's not registered but it could be if they wanted it too. They would only have to raise the ride height a bit. The car still has climate control and all that shit so it could compete in the super stock class thing at Tskuba.

I'm not sure. Anyone know if its street registered? Either way I'm very sure the Mine's R34 Demo Car sets the benchmark when it comes to R34s on the track (Fatest tsukuba time of 57.7?). The Z tune is a few seconds off but I dont remember the figures of the top of my head.

Z is around 300 K right? Mines is half that correct me if Im wrong...

Think the Mine's is about 200k in Japan, and the Z-Tune was 170k US

But yeah, after speaking to Matt, who drove the Z-tune from Sydney to Melbourne, he said it was pretty comfortable, and absorbed bumps etc really well. I doubt the Mine's would be so forgiving.

The Suzuki Mightyboy wins hands down. The Daewoo Matiz just can't keep up with it's blend of style, practicality and sheer horsepower.

What were we talking about again?

Edited by Big Rizza

Well I've seen the Z tune in the flesh, actually touched it, and it's something to behold. Seeing it fly around Oran Park was something else.

Very impressive car.

I can't comment on the Mines car cause I've only seen it in DVD's. But damn it's impressive in those dvd's.

I think I'd take a Mines R34 GTR though. Just cause.. :ninja:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Not noticeably. Arguably, the catless turbo is going to work harder in a different direction, as it will spool up faster, go to higher speeds more easily. Only if it was tuned in the original condition. If it was a stock tune, using the AFM before and after the cat/dump change, then no, no retune needed. If the car is running on a MAP sensor, then it might well benefit from a retune. It might even run a little dangerously without a retune, but it could quite easily be fine.
    • We had this blend that uses 98RON + 10% Ethanol which brought it to 100RON. It's no longer available anymore unfortunately.
    • Does it make a difference in your turbo having a shorter life if you have a cat converter as it causes that back pressure versus less/no back pressure with a decat? (Not sure if this is accurate) Also slightly different question if you went from a oem cat to a decat or vice versa will it require a tune? I heard if you change the dump pipe onwards it requires a tune?
    • No. Have only gotten as far as contemplating the task of having to put in the required fairly heavy wiring and fusing to run it (along with the big alternator), and preferring not to. But otherwise, it would be nice to have a little extra freedom as to exactly where the compressor is located and free up some space around the exhaust side of the engine.
    • Following from this in a related by not closely-related sense... Because I was buying a bunch of other GKTech stuff, I got some rear subframe collars. The history that leads up to this is: 25+ years ago the car arrived into the country with stock subframe bushes. At some point shortly thereafter I added Whiteline pineapple rings, set up neutral, and it improved the rear end behaviour. Well, it is my vague memory that I was happier with it with them in. Less axle tramp on launches, generally better, etc etc. ~2012 it got a new non-HICAS subframe with new stock bushes. No pineapple rings. I reckon that ever since then I've been dissatisfied with the axle tramp. Recently I've been f**king around a lot with all aspects of the suspension. One contemplation has been to relocate the rear lower control arm front mount points (and do the other things needed to make that work) to improve longitudinal rear grip by getting rid of some of the stupid anti-squat that Nissan ladled into the R32. But.... before doing that I thought I'd put some collars in. And.... The collars are good. The rear sounds a little bit different, but there has been no significant increase in NVH coming up into the body. In terms of rear behaviour - expansion joints on long sweeping elevated freeway ramps that would sometimes cause the rear to jiggle around a bit, no longer seem to do so. It appears that jamming chunks of metal into the gaps in the rubber so they can't move much is a really good thing. And the launch behaviour and general forward traction situation seems to be greatly improved too. It's impossible to be really sure, because the tyres are completely shagged - they are freakishly willing to let go right now. But as an A-B test with the same tyres it certainly seems to grip up a lot better. Highly recommended to anyone who still has stock bushes.
×
×
  • Create New...