Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Havent posted here in a while but ive been struck with abit of a query. I have an S15 which has a T28 BB Turbo standard.

Now i went to a dyno day and also went to get the car dyno tuned with a pfc.

The tuner said that it wasnt making enough top end power, being short 10-15rwkw with most s15's hes tuned with the same mods. So he is puzzled as to why and so am i! He said car was running healthy too, so it didnt show signs of cylinders gone etc, however I havent done a compression test. Mind you, he is a popular tuner in sydney, and has tuned my old R33 when I had that and had no dramas.

Here were some of the things he noticed while it was on the dyno:

1) When winding the boost up, it really didnt yield any more power. I have 2 boost controllers to try out and both of them showed no extra response on the dyno

2) The Intercooler piping going to the turbo was coated in oil

So are these signs that the turbo has gone bye bye or is about to go? If not, what can cause lower figures in terms of motor problems?

Im very puzzled and just trying to work this out. Any help or input would be appreciated. I dont have the dyno graph either cause I dont pick up the car till friday. Car has all the supporting mods to at least reach 190 - 200rwkw and the car only pushed 180rwkw

Edited by Mr_G
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/133265-turbo-busted/
Share on other sites

more boost doesnt always equal more power. this is only true when you are still in the effeiency zone of the compressor. if its only 10rwkw who cares. its hardly anything significant. if the turbo was shagged i would expect it to be more obvious. lots of lag, squealing coming on boost, smoke etc

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/133265-turbo-busted/#findComment-2469433
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies guys. Ill be going for a comp test next week just to put my mind at ease.

As for the manifold, it was changed to one of those stainless items that you get off ebay cause i got a good deal on it, however I still have the standard one just in case.

Ill be replacing all the vaccum lines, will be taking off all the IC hoses and placing them back on.

The pipe that is covered in oil is the one that goes from the cooler to the turbo. It has nothing else plugged into it, so i assume the oil comes through the turbo somehow?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/133265-turbo-busted/#findComment-2472430
Share on other sites

Got the car back, heres the graph.

Please critique your suspisions regarding the turbo.

From looking at the boost curve, it seems as though the actuator could be faulty?

But from driving it now compared to what it used to be, drives a whole lot better indeed :(

If the turbo is on its way out, Aarron from Sliding Performance will be getting the hi-flow job :O

post-8103-1157713420.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/133265-turbo-busted/#findComment-2475608
Share on other sites

looks alright to me.

the boost is dropping away as you can see, so power is going to drop, get it to hold boost and it might fatten up a bit at the top end, although that may not be too easy if the turbo is starting to drop out of its efficiency range.

could be a gazillion reasons why the power is 10kw different to other cars, i wouldn't worry to much.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/133265-turbo-busted/#findComment-2476281
Share on other sites

Yeah your EBC is not doing its job of holding the boost. I wouldnt say the actuator is stuffed beacuse its still holding 14psi at 6500rpm (my old stock turbo'd S14 could only hold 11.5psi by then lol)

I wouldn't worry about another 10rwkw. Thats only what.. a bit more than 5%? Thats nothing, so long as your happy with the car!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/133265-turbo-busted/#findComment-2476723
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies guys. At least ive narrowed my problem to be something to do with the turbo and not the motor.

But the mid range gain is very impressive. This was in combination with an adjustable exhaust cam gear. Now when it comes on, especially in the wet, its lights em up easy!

Im pretty sure from looking at the graph, the actuator is busted. Im running a turbosmart boost t, which holds fine on my friends car, but my car, doesnt seem to hold as fine :) So thus, i think the problem is the actuator.

What do you guys think of this theory? Although there is the possiblity that the turbo could be abit busted, causing the eratic boost curve

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/133265-turbo-busted/#findComment-2476826
Share on other sites

Your wastegates fine. When that screws up, which mine did I had no boost at all in the top end.

I wouldn't worry too much about the power figure. 186rwkw is about right. Mine has made between 187-195 on the same dyno on different days on the same boost setting. Just see if you can get the boost a bit more stable and your set. All good.

Having a bit of oil residue in the pipework is pretty normal. As someone else said it will just be the head breathing.

As for the comment about sr's cracking pistons at 190rwkw- anything is possible but it is the common consensus that a sr20 if tuned properly will last forever with <=200rwkw. 200-250 is leaning on it and beyond that things start to break. That said the GT Autosound drift car (HPI) which is now Christian Pickerings drift car makes 306rwkw with a stock bottom end!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/133265-turbo-busted/#findComment-2477224
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...