Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Could you guys get a table going for the some of our cars?

btw. mine is done thru Advanced Autos as well - they sound like they're hiding something ie. non V-Spec badged as V-Spec.

Here's mine:

ECR33-058499

T.

Model: GGKBRTFR33VDA--JD-

Year 06/1995

Colour: KL0

Int colour: K

Manual RB25DET with HICAS

2WD

*** PARTS LIST DISPLAY ***

VIN-Code : ECR33 -058499 Model : GGKBRTFR33VD

Model Series : R33 Prod.M/Y : 9506 Color :# KL0

ÎÞÃÞ¨ : 2K ´Ý¼ÞÝ : RB25DET »½Íßݼ®Ý : HICAS ¸ÄÞ³

¸ÞÚ-ÄÞ : GTS25T/M Я¼®Ý : MT.F5

Part Ord Part No I/C Per Sal

No Code Qty ALTERNATE PART NO CD DESCRIPTION Veh Cod

*** THANK YOU FOR MAKING IT USE A DAILY OUTPUT PURE PROPER PART REALLY. ***

jtil, if your car was made before 2001 (date of the DB that everyone's downloading) then it will show up. I've ordered the April 2004 Jap FAST on dvd from japan, we'll see how that goes when it gets here.

And mindflux the au db has the 100 R32 GTR's that were released in AU and all the R31 Silhouettes i'd assume. But I can't share it as that was part of the deal, sorry guys. I'm more than happy to run the VIN's thru it tho.

Hey guys could someone please check a vin for me and post the results. Got my correct vin number this time, was a bit of confusion with it.

HCR32-001702

Thanks in advance

*** PARTS LIST DISPLAY ***

VIN-Code : HCR32 -001702 Model : KRCR32RGFSME

Model Series : R32 Prod.M/Y : 8905 Color :# AH3

ÎÞÃÞ¨ : 2K ´Ý¼ÞÝ : RB20DT ¸ÄÞ³ : HI.2WD ¸ÞÚ-ÄÞ

Я¼®Ý : MT

Part Ord Part No I/C Per Sal

No Code Qty ALTERNATE PART NO CD DESCRIPTION Veh Cod

*** THANK YOU FOR MAKING IT USE A DAILY OUTPUT PURE PROPER PART REALLY. ***

strutto looking at the part numbers on some parts i allready have it does not show full parts listing IE

rb20det

say a timing belt on fast is is listed as 13028

but the full part # is 1302820p25

does anybody know how or where the full parts listing is for each part ?

  • 2 weeks later...

funkey monkey.. I have the 09.2003 dvd. I did upload it a while back but not sure what happened to it now.

My one seems to be missing a few cars... ie, mine and a few i checked in this thread. Would also like to know how to get it out in Jap font so i can run through a translator.

dave.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...