Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi people, just need some input. Have been tuning my pfc for the last coulpe of days, have a RB25DET with GT2530 running at 1bar with std AFM and Injectors, seems that the max load scale has dropped from 15 down to 17 one the same boost? as I have been advancing the time in stages, watching for knock. I was under the impression that the load is relative to boost? 0 is load cell 9 on my setup and 15 was 14.7psi. I feel the engine is making more power with the time that I have tuned in which has a higher air flow which has brought it to load cell 17 but how can there be more load with the same boost? :laugh:

Second Q's, I have been playing with the total advance timming to full load at say 4000rpm on 1bar, My timming is 14deg at that point, I have tired 15deg which it will knock at 88, having looked at some base maps of a RB25DET at the same points the std ecu runs like 21deg? Fuel ratio is spot on for all points (11.7 on 1bar all the way to red) I have a FMIC (PWR), any help is greatly apprreciated. :laugh:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/134850-power-fc-r33-help/
Share on other sites

if you increase boost pressure, as long as you are in effiency zone of the compressor wheel (the compressor map will tell the effiency zone) then it will bring more air into the system. so by adding more boost, it forces in more air. this in turn is shown via the airflow meter signal.

there is always more air coming into the sytem, despite pressure being fixed.

this is usually why map sensor setups are sucky with load points, as one boost hits target they dont show any more into coming into the system, even though more is coming in, but pressure is the same

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I definitely agree with you there - I never click on content for cars I would never ever be able to get or compete with/against/be seen next to. Seeing a MX5 compete with a FD RX7 will make people upset though, for sure. Even in 2.5L Turbo form which is pretty grass roots. (or at least as grass roots as classic cars can be) Yes we're all classic car owners now.
    • Wonder what the cause is, but here's hoping it's nothing too serious.
    • People don't always want builds that are overly expensive, or have engineering/registration/insurance issues and head aches that come with them Whilst big dollar builds, and complicated stuff is interesting to watch, there is only a tiny % of people who would actually use this information, or have the spare finances to drop on said builds, whereas the buy a cheap(ish) cool car, and make it better, with a average budget, that the average Joe or Jane could achieve will always be a winner in my opinion 
    • Bit of a thread revival, you mentioned wanting a bit more top end before, do you regret not going with the 1.01?
    • It's kind of interesting - They definitely do builds that split the difference between what they like and what will generate views and engagement. The NC Platform always surprises everyone in a good way, in an uncomfortably good way some may say. They could throw a LS in there and arguably have the best (and best performing) car of the entire stable. But that isn't necessarily what draws views, because people viewing don't want to accept the vegetables of a LS NC MX5 being a superior vehicle in every way (including fun) than a RB26 240Z. This is also why there's not a lot of content about the GR Yaris (on the web in general). They're too good, yet 'only a Yaris' The community doesn't want certain cars to be as good as they are - to beat their hero cars, and I believe the NC MX5 is absolutely one of those cars.
×
×
  • Create New...