Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the GT-V was first released in '99. yes, you are right in saying that it is basically a turbo spec car just with the NA RB25DE. the bayside blue was only available in the S2 release of the R34's and manual transmissions are only marginally more available in coupe from than sedan.

it's not a luxury sedan/coupe version.

mine cost me $18490 on road (complied/registered) and took just under 6 months to find - a grade 4, 70885K's, manual GT-V sedan.

do a search for GT-V and you should find a couple of other threads from earlier this year.

No, I had mine imported early this year. the benefits are aplenty of a base 25GT, turbo gear for one i.e. brakes, suspension, interior, front strut brace and the turbo cars 17" alloys. the 2nd benefit would be fuel economy. how many turbo cars get 630K's to a tank?

k, would i be right in saying a future turbo conversion to a gt-v would be very easy?

would be no different to doing a turbo conversion to any other R34

just that all the supporting systems are there - most importantly brakes, ready to take the increased power.

correct me if i'm wrong but isnt the suspension setup from the R34 GT25 the same as R34 GTT, same interior (minus boost gauge).

so all that you have extra is really the colour of the car and the brakes?

No, I had mine imported early this year. the benefits are aplenty of a base 25GT, turbo gear for one i.e. brakes, suspension, interior, front strut brace and the turbo cars 17" alloys. the 2nd benefit would be fuel economy. how many turbo cars get 630K's to a tank?

Depending on the car alot of turbo's can get 630ks to a tank.... but thats just me being a smart arse :)

My R34 GT-T Sedan - pretty much 90% h'wy driving manages to get 500k then the flue light comes on but there is always 15litres left in the tank so add another 100ks as it runs at 10 litres per hundred k's.

I come close to your 630k mark. :(

Drew.

You also get the HICAS and LSD from the GT-T in addition to the 4 pot brakes, 17 inch rims etc

Hicas and LSD seem to be available on most if not all skylines regardless of turbo or not. (actually the skylines seem like a fairly customisable car when in production, with alot of these being factory options)

just apart from brakes and rims, (and the obvious engine and gearing) i cant see any marked differences. not playing the GT-V down, just want to know what makes a GT-V a GT-V.

They're far more rare than standard 25GTs and generally command a small premium when buying them at auction. I was after one originally but I ended up settling for the 25GT as I didn't think it was worth it (additional price, extra searching)

To my knowledge the only differences are mechanical - brakes, LSD, HICAS and the 17" rims from factory (instead of options)

The standard 25GT has a strut brace, and as far as I know, the same suspension. The only difference in interior between the 3 are the turbos have guages sitting in the middle of the dash - everything else is identical.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 100% agree. Best bet on an RB will be NEO, but even it will be a long way off. Emissions is one of the big reasons car manufacturers went to DBW and constantly variable cams. When cruising, open the throttle right up, but reduce dynamic compression so low, that it's basically an unrestricted air pump moving very little air.
    • I’m hosting a bunch of execs in the McLaren box on Saturday. If you’re around I’ll come say hi, and see if I can sneak out some freebies.
    • Yes. All of this. But even when you get the NOx as low as you can go on an RB, it will no doubt still be way too high. Same with CO and HCs. The tech and the tuning time just isn't there.
    • Dang. I love the little 'oil used' bingo card on the side.   🤣  Well, now they can use a box and an oil-filled goon.
    • Many many moons ago, I was chatting with Andy Wyatt, about his auto ignition tuning. One of the HUGE things he said to me, when tuning for power, right where you hit peak ignition timing for your max torque, dramatically increases NOx emissions. He was finding in testing, particularly on engines you could advance timing beyond peak torque, that backing the ignition timing off a couple of degrees only made for a small drop in torque (compared to if you keep backing it off further the same amount of degrees) but dramatically reduced NOx emissions. I'd say targetting for 14.7, and he's even mentioned in some scenarios going slightly leaner, and pulling a few degrees of IGN timing will help pass for emissions quite a lot. However, who tunes an RB for emissions
×
×
  • Create New...