Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i was just flicking through the history books at bathurst results, and here's what i found.

in 1989 the winner and second place cars were ford sierras. they were both on the final lap.

1 lap behind were 2 hr31 skylines. the qualifying time of the 1st place sierra was 2:16.79 by dick johnson/john bowe, and dick held the fastest lap. the qualifying time of the fastest r31 (NOT jim richards/mark skaife) was 2:19.64.

in 1990 the winner was a vl commodore. second was a sierra. jim richards/mark skaife's gtr was in 18th place, abuot 15 laps behind. they did set the fastest lap of the race, but were out gunned in qualifying by the sierras. (gtr=2:15.66, sierra driven by brock=2:14.71 (but that wasn't the quickest))

in 1991 the gtr took 1st and 3rd with a vn in the middle. the vn was 1 lap behind, and the second gtr another lap behind that. fastest race lap was again the gtr.

then came 1992, and the controversial win for the gtr. the race was called off on lap 144, just after the gtr crashed into the wall, and take back to the results at the end of lap 143. this gave the win to skaife/richards. followed by the sierra of johnson/bowe on the same lap. fastest lap of the race was the gtr, 0.2 of a second quicker than the sierra. qualifying was a different story however, with the sierra clocking 2:12.898 and the gtr 2:14.546.

so just a few facts for the people who weren't old enough to remember the gtr at bathurst or thought that nothing else even stood a chance. the gtr did get beaten, and didn't qualify the best.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/135100-interesting-bathurst-info/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

What you need to understand was that for the 1990 race the GT-R was completely unsorted. It had only just been finished and was, by all accounts, a horrible thing to drive on the Thursday/Friday/Saturday before the race.

Only one car was entered, & from memory it broke a drive shaft - hence the reason for the missing 15 or so laps. Skaife got told to go out & drive it as fast as it would go in the hope of learning a bit more. The lap record was the result of that instruction.

those definitely were the days of motor racing.

i always loved how the sierra's would pull away from the GTR's up mountain and down conrod straight :rofl:

it was a totally different story up on the mountain though :/

all in all, the cossies did very well for under tyred, RWD, 2L turbos.

Edited by RS500

I also have heard (on very good authority I might add) that the sierra turbos didn't exactly conform to the rules and regs at the time :P

...that might explain the ability as djr81 posted above to reliably push so much boost through the motor :rolleyes:

HRT used to front at Bathurst (Well, Tom Walkinshaw mostly) and basically protest the living crap out of every competitive car there was. Mostly this involved lodging protests against the vital bits of the opposition cars - in the case of the Sierras the turbos were a favourite because they were so damn critical to the set up & on a knife edge to get maximum horsepower. It used to put the teams to alot of work & disrupt their preparation - which was mostly the point of the protests. I can only recall one instance of a protest on thsose grounds ever being upheld & even then I think it was over turned on appeal (Colin Bond's Sierra, if memory serves)

The ironic thing was that the HRT cars were rubbed out when the Ford teams got sick of the carry on & lodged counter protests for illegal steering racks in the VL's.

Just another reason to hate those from the dark side.

Oh, yeah & according to Allan Moffat his RX-7 actually came second in 84. So no 1 - 2 for the HDT.

Edited by djr81

funny, no one mentioned that the r32gtr had carried (200kg i think) extra weight and boost restrictors in efforts to give the other cars a chance(still didnt work). Remove them and see if any sierras would of went past.The sierras were boosted to shithouse and were just marginally quicker down conrod.

Theres a reason the GTR got called GODZILLA :)

What you need to understand was that for the 1990 race the GT-R was completely unsorted. It had only just been finished and was, by all accounts, a horrible thing to drive on the Thursday/Friday/Saturday before the race.

Only one car was entered, & from memory it broke a drive shaft - hence the reason for the missing 15 or so laps. Skaife got told to go out & drive it as fast as it would go in the hope of learning a bit more. The lap record was the result of that instruction.

Excuses, excuses. In an endurance race it wasnt as reliable as the VL Walki :happy:

And it was introduced earlier in the season by Mark Skaife to get some development kms on it. Richards stuck with the R31 as he was shooting for the SATCC (which he ended up winning). So it had races under its belt.

Theres a reason the GTR got called GODZILLA

being the only 4wd in the pack it would shit all over them off the line. which i do see as an unfair advantage. they could hold it at 7500rpm and just side-step the clutch. that doesn't take much delicacy. had the gtr been forced to run in rwd only i think it would've been a completely different story.

as for the djr sierra. he was running the most powerful sierra of the time. he took 1 of his cars over to europe to race and was about to lap second place when the turbo blew.

but what annoys me about it all is that people are arrogant and say the GTR kicked butt, but don't take into account that holden was the only v8 there, the bmw's were non turbo 6's, and the fords were 4 cyclinder turbo's, and the gtr was 4wd, so it had a massive advantage off the line, out of corners, and in the wet. so had the GTR not been so dominant i would've been worried.

yeah but it was never considered a threat either by dinosaur cubic inches heads and sAfrican Americaned at.... it taught lessons!!! thats why all the kafufal.

being knobbled like it was and to still smack ass is australian HISTORY now except it !

being the only 4wd in the pack it would shit all over them off the line. which i do see as an unfair advantage. they could hold it at 7500rpm and just side-step the clutch. that doesn't take much delicacy. had the gtr been forced to run in rwd only i think it would've been a completely different story.

as for the djr sierra. he was running the most powerful sierra of the time. he took 1 of his cars over to europe to race and was about to lap second place when the turbo blew.

but what annoys me about it all is that people are arrogant and say the GTR kicked butt, but don't take into account that holden was the only v8 there, the bmw's were non turbo 6's, and the fords were 4 cyclinder turbo's, and the gtr was 4wd, so it had a massive advantage off the line, out of corners, and in the wet. so had the GTR not been so dominant i would've been worried.

It wasnt just the 4wd it was the whole package buddy. Like i said before you think the sierras were good, why dont you watch a couple jap group A races and watch the seirras get left like they a barina's. :happy:

had the gtr been forced to run in rwd only i think it would've been a completely different story.

Wrong again. The GTR's in JGTC were RWD and they still owned all. after the calsonic R32 won every race the whole season they were made to drop the 4WD.

Wrong again. The GTR's in JGTC were RWD and they still owned all. after the calsonic R32 won every race the whole season they were made to drop the 4WD.

Japan like every other country adopted their own rules after the passing of the Grp A regs. And when you look at the quality and speed of cars in other championships Australian Grp A cars were some of the quickest around. I would go as far as saying that if Glen Seton rocked up to a Jap round, ditto John Bowe then the Jap GTRs would have got a fright.

If Jim Richards had rocked up to a Jap round in the Winfield car, they would have all been convincingly beat by Gentlemen Jim.

Sorry but the Japanese do not know how to build the quickest race cars :happy:

Sorry but the Japanese do not know how to build the quickest race cars :)

That's why they stole all the parts from the Gibson GT-R's :happy:

I thought all the winging about the seirra's was that they were ment to have a set boost level and not adjust it through the race. But at Bathurst, they wound the boost up to get a lead, and then wound it down to 'cruise' home. But Holden worked out all they had to do was keep up with em till the poor old turbo's exploded.

I wish we still had Group-A and the Group-A WTCC :ermm:

Edited by sav man

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...