Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

195rwkw

2.3 second 60 foot

13.6@105mph

Launched at about 3 grand sliping the clutch with a little wheel spin any more revs or a dump of the clutch would relult in to much wheel spin and similar times to what you got. To little a revs would result in the car bogging down and getting similar times to what you got. Im pretty quick though the gears but struggled on the launch for a start. The last run was about as good as I could do with the 235 tyres I had.

Ive heard that if you can take 0.1 of your 60ft it results in .2 or .3 at the end.

I attatched the time slip I was racing a stipped out BMW M3 with simi slicks, with a 1.87 60 ft time he managed a 12.9 at the same 105mph.

With better tyres and better 60 footer a 12 would be possible with a 190-200rwkw GTS25-T

keep practicing

cheers

post-28325-1159227178.jpg

Edited by Munna1

Cheers Munna1 can you talk me through the slipping of the clutch trick as im not quite understanding how this is done.

and y would my car Bog down when i jam it into 4th gear. is that a clutch problem. ? (i still have the stock clutch)

I thought Nickr33 explained it well earlier in the thread.

3,500 is too much in my opinion... try about 2,500 and when the light goes green dont drop the clutch, ride it out slowly as you keep your right foot pinned to the floor... if you feel too much wheelspin ease the clutch out slower, if you feel it start to bog drop it quicker etc etc... change at 6,500 - 7000 trying not to hit the limiter, changing slightly early is better than smashing the limiter... your power curve flattens out at about 6,000 anyway... make sure your changes are nice and crisp and you should see the 13's no worries

I do much the same thing exept I usually launch at just under 3000rpm, and slip the clutch while squeezing the gas peddle in rather than keeping it pinned to the floor. Its hard to explain but you learn to feel when the wheels are going to spin, you want to get just a little bit of wheel spin, too much will have you bag up the tyres and you will go no-where, to little and you will bogg down its a very fine line.

If feel its going to spin to much I give it slightly less throttle and slightly more clutch, If I feel its going to bog I give it slightly more throttle and slightly less clutch.

Track condition, suspention, and tyre all play a part in what revs I start at and how much gas/clutch slip I need. Takes me a few runs to work all this out.

Im a novice (2.3 60ft is shit), theres probably better ways to launch but thats what worked best for me.

Id be interested to hear how some of the more experienced drag races launch.

Not sure why it bogs down in 4th by the look of your dyno sheet you have a nice wide power band I change into 4th at spot on 150kmph which is very close to the rev limiter, maybe you change a little early? If it where your clutch you would notice it in other gears easpecially lower ones. I have a exeedy heavy duty its a great clutch with an exellent feel.

cheers

Edited by Munna1

2500rpm is way to low to launch with. you are leaving the line off boost. my mate was launghing his 33 at 3500, then i told him to go to 4500 and he ran his quickest time of the night, and his 60ft times dropped from 2.4's to a 2.2

Well thats exactly it.. It comes down to tyres. It really is amazing what a decent set will do to traction.

yes. 'hard as' 205/55/16's trying to put down over 200kw + 1st gear @ WOT = sideways instead of fowards

I remember the rb20 with with 160rwkw running 205's.. They would light up and skate around in second. :pirate:

They were near the end of their life though. :O

How worn a tyre is makes a huge difference to its traction levels.

2500rpm is way to low to launch with. you are leaving the line off boost. my mate was launghing his 33 at 3500, then i told him to go to 4500 and he ran his quickest time of the night, and his 60ft times dropped from 2.4's to a 2.2

i did a 2.0 60ft taking off at around 2500rpm but suppose different setups, take off techinques etc all are factors affecting launch & somethings work for some but not for others

This was mine... first time ever.. 1.. 2... 3.. GO.. *SHIT ITS GREEN I NEED TO GO*

R/T = 0.870 <---lolz

60" = 2.438 <---lolz

330" = 6.560 <---haw haw

660" = 9.696

mph = 80.76

1000" = 12.318

ET = 14.535 <-okish

MPH = 102.52

km/h = 164.99

Just for interest the tyres I used where hankook Ventus Sport K104 with about 80% tread, 235's on a 17" rims 25psi tyre pressure. It was a 30 degree day at heathcote, traction got better when the big boys came out and layed down heaps of sticky rubber.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've been pondering this, I really enjoy the convertible thing, for me, it's like riding a motorbike, without all the issue of riding a motorbike, mainly, my old sore arthritic joints getting beaten up, and, being able to do it in shorts and a T-shirt and not needing a helmet and all the other gear required, especially like wearing jackets and pants in the summer, or needing 6 layers of cloths in the winter, or not having wet weather gear handy when your 100km away from home on the bike when it decides to start raining As for the hard top and its Coupe look, whilst I do lose all that open top feeling that I really enjoy, from my experience with the NB with a detachable hard top, the cabin is a much nicer place to be, the difference in noise for one, a hard top quietens down the interior, alot, with the soft top up or down it's pretty noisy, which, after 5 or so hours, can get tiring But, as you stated, the detachable hard top totally changes the look of the car, in a really good way, and for me, the look of a detachable hard top is so much better than the PRHT which looks more like a after thought with its weird bulbous rear roof line For me, the minimal effort of putting in on, or storing it after removing it, is well worth the time and effort for the look alone And yes, I'm sure the next owner will be grateful for it as well.......  
    • I get into huffs with people when I suggest the MX5 looks so much better as a coupe than it does as convertible. Pretty sure I don't prefer the convertible version of anything. Good job on the hardtop! The next buyer will appreciate.
    • IMO wrap does have its uses, but like you said, quality wrap, and professional installation, would probably cost want a quality paint job does, but, the paint, if maintained, is basically for life, and much easier to touch up if required  In other news: it's pissing down here, with thunder, lightning and only some small hail "at this stage", luckily all "my" cars are undercover  I've also been contacted by a guy in Newcastle about the SS, he said he will come down next weekend for a look, we'll see how that transpires I guess 🫰
    • Nah, I'm not an a-hole, ha ha!   I do like the colour match. Some of the carbon fibre wraps are quite freaking horrible. There's one a local company I know uses, and it looks damn good! Also very very expensive per metre to buy! ha ha ha It might be cheaper to respray the roof than use the good CF Wrap, ha ha!
    • Please noooooooo 😭 As for wrap, no thank you mate, I've seen and used "carbon fibre" wrap before, and for these hard tops, they look soooo good when colour matched Like this >>>
×
×
  • Create New...