Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanks for all the input guys. Damage was done on piston no. 1. He is a qualified mechanic and has prevously worked at a high performance workshop. He has has had many cars thats he has worked on enter numerous car shows. I dont know why, but he must of cranked it over many times as the valve looks like its been chewed up and spit out! He must of had the timing belt on when he cranked it over otherwise there would be more then one damaged valve. But i was not there to see. How could the valve seat dislodge itself in the 1st place? Cause that is also what he has stated. Hard to tell coz there was pretty much no valve seat left! Other then the broken valve, would anything else in the vavle train need to be replaced? Someone mentioned retainer? Also i have heard that the rods are GTR. Would the force and stress have damaged or weaken it in any way? My friend said that i may need the rod resize which also means a balance bottom end! ouch!

I will take this as an oppurtunity to rebulid my engine with forgies etc. Since the block needs to be honed, i will get oversized forgies (40 thou),

new big end bearings and rod and main bearings. Along with a thicker gasket ( 1.2mm ), heavy duty valve springs and head studs. Any other suggestions and advice/feedback would be greatly appreciated. i have a GCG highflow and NOS kit both still in their boxes along with all other supporting mods. As the GCG maxs out at around 260rwkw ( what a shame coz the engine package can handle way more! ) ive decided to make the most out of my NOS. Love it or hate it boys!!! Any idea as to the max jet size i can run providing the clutch is up tio scratch?

Valve seats don't just pop out, or disappear. Get the fragments and photograph them clearly on the broken surfaces.

Rods should not need a resize unless the bearings have spun and damaged the journals. Get them x-rayed though for cracks. Costs about $20. You would balance it while it is apart. Again, doesn't cost much but doing all the right things adds up. Also get the crank checked for straightness.

I don't see the need for a 1.2mm gasket for the low power you will be running. It will just hurt engine response. Use a stock gasket and O ring the block. Same with valve springs (unless you are using a big big cam) and studs. They are not a normal point of failure on engines running upwards of 300 rwkw and I assume the NOS is just a 50hp shot, so unless you have plans of a big kW engine they will be just bragging goodies.

Forgies are pretty well mandatory in RB25s but I think the Neo is a bit better built considering only a few ringland issues recorded, plus they come stock with GTR spec rods. The head stuff is unecessary unless wanting to rev beyond 8000-8500 regularly and even then the valves will be a limiting factor, as well as the hydraulic buckets. Just putting into perspective why you would need to install such items. I'm all for a completely tuff engine, but only if you will actually use the expensive items.

Damn. I wanted to be the one to tell you that. hehe.

I smashed my ringlands.

With NOS if you are running a lot of it you need pistons with bigger clearances and make sure you have good quality headstuds. How much are we talking? I'd hate to have to drill for bigger head studs.

Also you mention valve springs but not cams. :happy: Tomei type B Poncams work with stock valve train. I don't think you should go any bigger with that turbo. You might like bronze valve guides but for the money I don't think they are worth it unless the aforementioned hit of nos is really big.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As you're looking at using a Link ECU, then large injectors are not a problem. But there's not really any need to go 1000s on an RB20 unless you're planning >>600HP on E85, which would seem unlikely. There are other options for injectors. The Xspurt ones are available from a number of places and you can get them in the mid 600s and 725cc, which is probably a sensible place to be. These are all EV14 based. If you are not using the stock AFM (at all, which would be the case with a Link) then a large turbo intake pipe to suit the ATR turbos is not an obstacle, so you should use one instead of a highflow. Results will be better.
    • Hey guys,  I'm after some advice and this here is the best place to get it imo. I was a member a looong time ago under another account, with a lost email address. Its nice to jump back on and see some of the same names still giving good advice.  I mothballed my car when i moved to perth in 2013, and after getting towed across the nullabor a few times it has officially done more km's on a trailer than under its own power. Now that i have started the process of tidying up and modifying it, i see the fruit available (and the fruiterers selling the produce) is different than back in the day. hence my questions, as i used to 'know' what to get and now, i'm not so sure. Engine wise the car (92 gtst) has a walbro 255, k+n, fmic, cam gears and and turbo back 3"exhaust. Wish list is a Hypergear high flow or ATR43G1, Link G4x and some newer injectors before a tune up. My goals are modest, only low 200's power wise. i know i could achieve this with less, but i've been swapping out old for new where i can. Every cooling hose has been replaced, along with mani gaskets, WP, thermostat and radiator, fuel pump and timing belt, tensioner and idler, and i rebuilt the steering rack. Regarding the injectors, the fruiterers all seem to sell what used to be considered quite large injectors. There are a lot of options for bosch 1000cc EV14's, and i would like to know if that is a suitable choice for my build. Is modern injector design good enough to run these at the low duty cycles that i likely would be? is there a downside to running a too large injector these days? or, would there be an upside to running a smaller injector at higher duty cycle? I can see that there are smaller injectors still available, but the ones i have seen specifically marketed for RB's are pretty large (see: https://golebysparts.au/collections/fuel-rail-injector-kits/products/nissan-rb20-fuel-rail-bosch-980cc-1150cc-injectors-turbosmart-fpr800-regulator-kit), and i dont know enough about them to say one not marketed for RB's would fit or not. I have searched the forums, and amongst all the posts on older tech, I did see gtsboy recommend EV14's, but no size was mentioned... again, i'm not clear on if the smaller size bosch injectors are also EV14's as they do look similar.  also, if someone can recommend a tuner familiar with RB's in the Geelong or West Melbourne area i'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance guys. Cheers, Rowdy  
    • FWIW the depth of the groove in the rubber pad is not super essential, the blocks are rubber and squish a bit. If you are worried an angle grinder will make a deeper groove quick smart
    • I mean, if you were to move the jacking points away from the original location, that is, away from the wheels and closer to the centreline of the car, then it will be more likely to overbalance and tip off the supports. Same as we talked about before. I was talking about moving for-aft. If the sill is bent outward or inward, then the car would obviously look unstraight from the outside. Hopefully that hasn't happened either. Again, you can do comparative measurements from the chassis rails to see if there is much deflection.
    • Can you elaborate what you mean with your first sentence? I meant move as in the bulge kinda seemed like it got pulled "outward" meaning it got pulled down and to the side with the jacking rail itself, so the load bearing bulge now sits lower than usual and is not level with the sill on the other side of the jack point. Either that or the jacking rail just got pushed in a good bit.
×
×
  • Create New...