Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I thought I'd get an idea of the engines health before spending big on a turbo upgrade. It was done at Allstar tuning in Brisbane and they seemed pretty happy with the results.

Compression

1-170

2-155

3-165

4-160

5-160

6-165

Leakdown

1-10%

2-20%

3-12%

4-16%

5-17%

6-10%

After a turbo upgrade my target is 260rwkw. Will the engine be able to handle it and should I be worried about cylinder 2?

Thanks in advance. :D

from memory.... spec for turbo rb's should be

all above 128psi

no more than 17psi variance

so your motor is within spec.. barely!

it sounds like it's getting to the stage where i would do a 'simple' rebuild, but if you can't do it yourself and have to pay someone to do it, wait until it get's really bad and do a full rebuild.

if it were me and i were running that much power i'd consider taking it apart, inspecting the pistons and bores (especially number 2) and bearings, give it a quick hone and some new rings and head gasket - (ie stuff you can do with engine in the car). If you need to pay someone to do that, may as well do everything while you're there though.

Damn, that doesnt sound good at all :D . Looks like I'll have to put off the turbo and suspension upgrade and spend the dosh on a rebuild. I might aswell get some forged parts and go for a higher power figure later on. Its driven daily but I wanted to build it for track days and hillclimbs. Off to do some research, might have to PM SK and see what he thinks.

Thanks guys.

after 100,000 and a GT30 on the side of mine, and all of my own tuning

all about 160psi

Biggest variance was 4 psi

leakdown was 3% across all 6 cylinders.

Man, 20% leakdown means its f**ked. Rebuild it now before you damage it worse but blowing a piston in half.

^^ True,

But if it's correct it has taken 92000 km's for the engine to wear to your results, do the math and you will still get a fair bit of milage before it goes! Keeping in mind the extra kw also.

Cheers

Josh

Yep spend all your $$ now on support mods and bolt ons... Then when the motor gets noticably tired you have an excuse (for the missus) to get it rebuilt. Rebuild it now and then try to justify support mods after.. Doesn't always go down too well. :(

Do they only do a "dry" leak down test?

You haven't put up "wet" leak down results, so I assume not.

Take it back and get them to do a "wet leak down test".

That will tell you if it's a valve seal problem or a ring seal problem.

If it's a valve seal problem then a simple (relatively) head service will fix it.

Post up the results "wet" leak down test and we will go from there.

:D cheers :)

to me it looks ok, compression test should be within 10% of each other, cylinder leakage should be no more than 20% (one is borderline). You have to keep in mind that with the cylinder leakage, most of the pressure goes through the ring gaps. As sydneykid said, it should be done wet as well, even a wet compression test will tell you if its rings or a valve sealing problem.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
×
×
  • Create New...