Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I thought I'd get an idea of the engines health before spending big on a turbo upgrade. It was done at Allstar tuning in Brisbane and they seemed pretty happy with the results.

Compression

1-170

2-155

3-165

4-160

5-160

6-165

Leakdown

1-10%

2-20%

3-12%

4-16%

5-17%

6-10%

After a turbo upgrade my target is 260rwkw. Will the engine be able to handle it and should I be worried about cylinder 2?

Thanks in advance. :D

from memory.... spec for turbo rb's should be

all above 128psi

no more than 17psi variance

so your motor is within spec.. barely!

it sounds like it's getting to the stage where i would do a 'simple' rebuild, but if you can't do it yourself and have to pay someone to do it, wait until it get's really bad and do a full rebuild.

if it were me and i were running that much power i'd consider taking it apart, inspecting the pistons and bores (especially number 2) and bearings, give it a quick hone and some new rings and head gasket - (ie stuff you can do with engine in the car). If you need to pay someone to do that, may as well do everything while you're there though.

Damn, that doesnt sound good at all :D . Looks like I'll have to put off the turbo and suspension upgrade and spend the dosh on a rebuild. I might aswell get some forged parts and go for a higher power figure later on. Its driven daily but I wanted to build it for track days and hillclimbs. Off to do some research, might have to PM SK and see what he thinks.

Thanks guys.

after 100,000 and a GT30 on the side of mine, and all of my own tuning

all about 160psi

Biggest variance was 4 psi

leakdown was 3% across all 6 cylinders.

Man, 20% leakdown means its f**ked. Rebuild it now before you damage it worse but blowing a piston in half.

^^ True,

But if it's correct it has taken 92000 km's for the engine to wear to your results, do the math and you will still get a fair bit of milage before it goes! Keeping in mind the extra kw also.

Cheers

Josh

Yep spend all your $$ now on support mods and bolt ons... Then when the motor gets noticably tired you have an excuse (for the missus) to get it rebuilt. Rebuild it now and then try to justify support mods after.. Doesn't always go down too well. :(

Do they only do a "dry" leak down test?

You haven't put up "wet" leak down results, so I assume not.

Take it back and get them to do a "wet leak down test".

That will tell you if it's a valve seal problem or a ring seal problem.

If it's a valve seal problem then a simple (relatively) head service will fix it.

Post up the results "wet" leak down test and we will go from there.

:D cheers :)

to me it looks ok, compression test should be within 10% of each other, cylinder leakage should be no more than 20% (one is borderline). You have to keep in mind that with the cylinder leakage, most of the pressure goes through the ring gaps. As sydneykid said, it should be done wet as well, even a wet compression test will tell you if its rings or a valve sealing problem.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've tried all different combinations of BOVs/ no BOV and stock bypass valves over the years, on gear changes the stock bypass valve seems to get the car back on boost quicker because in part the turbos wheel speed isn't being slowed down by reversion, although they have issues holding boost much over the stock setting. Most aftermarket BOVs you can adjust the spring, tighter will make it open later and close sooner, but in my experience it'll cause a bit of flutter at low load/rpm anyway. I've also got some input into this whole no bov causing turbo wear, never had an issue on any on my turbos HOWEVER, I got my R33 GTST with 200k kms on it, with from what I can see still has the original turbo, no lateral shaft play but has about 4-5mm of play in and out which to me seems like a worn thrust bearing from years (100-150k kms?) of turbo flutter running no bov, so maybe there is some truth to it in the long run. But that'll never stop me loving the Stutututu while I have the car.   OP just wants to know if he can run a atmo vented BOV with no major issues and the answer is YES, plenty of people do it, there's no harm in installing it and seeing how it runs before spending $$$ on an aftermarket ecu, last time I bought a Nistune it was $2400 for install and a tune , unsure of todays prices but you get me. Crazy money to spend just to fix the minor inconvenience of stalling that can be overcome by letting the revs come down to near idle before putting the clutch in or a little bit of throttle to avoid it. You're better off leaving the ecu and tune for after a bigger turbo/injectors have been installed to take full advantage of the tune and get your moneys worth.   Let OP have his Whoosh sound without trying to break his bank haha
    • I see you missed the rest of the conversation where they have benefits, but nothing to do with avoiding breaking turbos, which is what the aftermarket BOV made all the fan boys, tuners, and modders believe was the only purpose for them...
    • But they do so for the other reasons to have a compressor bypass. It's in the name.
    • Wow. Pissy much? You on a mission to find old posts to argue with, or is this legitimately just because you're 5 years into a 1 day job?
×
×
  • Create New...