Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

kewl, cheers.

but wouldnt you be able to see the corrections %, and how many are set on your safc screen anyway?

i've heard some safc tunes have only used maybe 6 points. wouldnt this defeat the purpose of say a safc2 that has 12 available tune points ?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137015-safc-tune/#findComment-2551565
Share on other sites

haha yeah.. when i got my car running again my safc locked. it says i need a password to look into settings and stuff. it wasnt there before the rebuild.. maybe the long period without power did something.

i'll get them to fix it when i go for the tune.

btw.. if they only tune 6/12 points and you've got a nice looking power curve then i dont see the problem. if your power curve looked a bit fruity after using 6 points then i'd be worried.

it'll allow you to use your safc when you upgrade fuel pump/turbo etc where you'd actually need all 12. but anything above 230-250kw then i'd start thinking pfc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137015-safc-tune/#findComment-2555700
Share on other sites

Got my SAFC installed and tuned by Hitman. Have a look here for result.

I'm planning to sell it coz already got PFC also tuned by Hitman. If you want pm me and we can work out a deal I can drop the SAFC off at Hitman and all you have to do is come to his workshop and get it installed and tuned.

PS. By the way its the older version SAFC

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137015-safc-tune/#findComment-2557540
Share on other sites

I've read mixed reports about safc improving fuel economy. Many say it does, but others say it wont.

I'm not after big power, just keeping things moderate, but as a daily driver, i need the economy to improve.

I suspect it's running rich with 3inch exhaust and pod. 15L/100kms.

What's your take on this ? Safc will bring me joy, or dissapointment?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137015-safc-tune/#findComment-2563380
Share on other sites

i THINK the only difference is the safc2 has more correction points and a nobby thing instead of the buttons. safc should be fine for your mods. i only bought the safc2 because i wanted the newest one out at the time, not for any real performance gain.

here's my dyno graph:

post-13452-1160234479.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/137015-safc-tune/#findComment-2563828
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Cool to see you're on the forum man, think you've met my twin brother a few times (Brent).
    • Yeah everyone always seems to refer to them as S13 wheels however they came on R32 Skyline, A31 Cefiro, C33 Laurel etc., and also came polished diamond cut or painted depending on the model. Congrats on your GTS purchase! I'd personally leave it NA.
    • In this thing about this 100% renewal energy stuff I hear no one really talking about anything other than power and fuel really Power and fuel, whilst being a huge part of how we use the billion year old Dinosaur juices, are only 2, of the probably thousands of things that we need to use it for in the chemicals industries for making nearly everything we use nowadays I'm all for a clean planet, but if we want to continue to have all the day to day appliances and stuff that we rely on everyday we will still need fossil fuels Whilst I do love science, and how it can bring innovation, there's really a limit to how far it can go in relation to "going green" As for EV's, unless your charging of your own solar panels, it isn't helping the environment when you consider the the batteries, the mining processes required,  the manufacturing process required, and how long a batteries (read: the vehicle) lasts long term If I was supreme dictator of the world, I would ban the use of sugar for fizzy drinks and food additives and use that for ethanol manufacturing, petrol engines would be happier, and people would be alot healthier  Disclaimer: Whiskey manufacturing would still be required, so says the supreme dictator of the world Same same for all the vegetable oils that get pumped into all our food, use that for bio diesel Disclaimer: the supreme dictator would still require olive oil to dip his bread in This would take some of heat off the use of the use of fossil fuels which are required for everything we use, unless you want to go back to pre 1800 for heat and power, or the early 1900's for plastics and every thing else that has come from cracking ethylene  Would I be a fair and just dictator, nope, and I would probably be assassinated within my first few months, but would my cunning plan work, maybe, for a while, maybe not Meh, in the end in an over opinionated mildly educated arsehole typing out my vomit on my mobile phone, which wouldn't be possible without fossil fuels And if your into conspiracies, we only need the fossil fuels to last until a meteor hits, or thermonuclear annihilation, that would definitely fix our need for fossil fuels for manufacturing and power issues for quite some time  Meh, time for this boomer to cook his lunch on his electric stove and then maybe go for a drive in my petrol car, for fun    
    • It really helps that light duty vehicles have absolutely appalling average efficiency due to poor average load. Like 25% average brake thermal efficiency when peak is somewhere around 38% these days. So even a 60% BTE stationary natural gas plant + transmission and charging losses still doing much better with an EV than conventional ICE. And that's before we get into renewables or "low carbon nonrenewable" nuclear which makes it a no-brainer, basically. In commercial aircraft or heavy duty diesel pulling some ridiculous amount of weight across a continent the numbers are much more difficult to make work. I honestly think in 5-10 years we will still be seeing something like the Achates opposed piston diesels in most semi trucks running on a blend of renewable/biodiesel. Applications where the energy density of diesel is just too critical to compromise. CARB is running trials of those engines right now to evaluate in real world drayage ops, probably because they're noticing that the numbers just don't work for electrification unless our plan is to make glorified electric trains with high voltage wires running along every major highway and only a token amount of battery to make it 30 miles or something like that after detaching. Transport emissions is not insignificant especially in the US, but yes there's a lot of industrial processes that also need to be decarbonized. I agree the scale of the problem is pretty insane but EDF managed to generate ~360 TWh from their nuclear reactors last year and this is with decades of underinvestment after the initial big push in the 70s and 80s. I don't think the frame of reference should be solar-limited. France is not exactly a big country either. Maybe it doesn't work everywhere, but it doesn't have to either. We just can't live off of fracking forever and expect things to be ok.
×
×
  • Create New...