Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Got one in mine as it came with it.

pros,

handle high HP

handle a shit load of abuse(high rpm launches)

last a long time still going after 5 years of use

well built and engineered

no slippage

con's

gearbox breaker (no spring dampers or give)

bitch in stop start traffic

I thought more torque loading etc that the clutch lets through (quad vs triple) would mean more stress on the gearbox (physics), unless it has damper springs etc to take up shockloading. Still punishing gearbox though.

OS GIKKEN STR twin sounds good.......

Yeah i thought the same thing, Kier wilson explained it to me and showed me the differance between the clutches. Somehow the quad plate puts less effort on the driveline than the triple. if indoubt feel free to give Willalls a call, they had the trpiples in both there GTR's and now run the quad's as they found them easier and more friendly to drive. YEs they are the OS distributers here in S.A and would try to make a slae off the quad rather than the triple but i got the quad at the same price.

Fair enough, main thing is as long as you are happy with it, go with it.

I'm happy with my os triple as it has lasted so long (daily driver, 380ish RWHP) and only one busted g box so far, 3rd gear.

well the number of plates has very little bearing on driveability at all.

two equal clutches. both puck type. both metallic friction material. both same pressure plate. both solid centre. one is a tripple, one is a quad. I can tell you now they will both be the same to drive.

things that affect driveability of a clutch:

force of pressure plate

type of friction material used

style of plate (full face, puck type etc)

sprung/dampened centre

saying a quad plate is easier to drive than a tripple is still a useless statement. there are hundreds of types of each clutch. if I had a sprung centre, full faced, 1000kg pressure plate tripple plate. and on your advice that a quad plate will be better went and bought one. and it was solid centre, puck style plate, 1600kg pressure plate which do you think would be easier to drive? and kinder on the gearbox?

exactly. :) my point is. saying quads are better than tripples for driveability is not acurate. of all the factors in clutch design it probably has the least impact on driveability. and yes I've driven plenty of singles, quite a few twins, a number of triples and a couple of quads. I had an OS tripple in my GTR for over a year, and an OS twin in it for about a year.

so you guys wouldn't recommend a triple plate for daily driving? What power will a streetable twin plate hold up?

I converted my solid centre HKS twin plate to a sprung centre. Absolutely transformed the car (was a bitch to drive previously in stop start traffic) and seems to be surviving 400 rwkw abuse OK.

yep, massive difference between solid/sprung centre clutches.

and ookami, like i said, it depends on the type of tripple we are talking about.

if you are talking OS solid centre, puck style, tripple then no, it's no good for daily driving. if you are talking full face, sprung centre tripple, with a not too extreme clamp force then yes, it should be fine for street use.

Just get Jim to make you a clutch if your worried.

Tough as nails, great for street driving

best advice anyone could give you....

i daily drive my GTR, jim berry built mine.. it is a single plate button with a carbonics plate.. bites HARD.

and considering he built it cheaper than what a stock replacement costs... can't go wrong

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...