Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

what are the other reasons? make me believe that this is wrong and ill stop talking about it.. give me a list of reasons
We will ban you if you post any more girlie pics.

is that good enough a reason?

why posting harmless female pics is SO wrong on SAU??
It wasn't. We allowed it as long as it was kept to a socially acceptable standard. I'm sure when you open up a mag like FHM you don't see someone writing an article called "check out this camel toe" with pics of chicks of said toe-age.

But someone (you) decided no, that you'd link to a porn site (the URL clearly bloody had "PORN" in it, so don't play innocent) with that stuff in it... after we clearly said that we'd allow the thread as long as it was kept clean. So we've put a stop to it.

Now, we give a foot of allowance, and you keep pushing for a yard, then its just easier to see you leave. As for most of the people on SAU, how about you stop with your childish need to see semi naked women, and we'll see how many people actually leave. Its a gamble we're willing to take.

You also have to remember that most employers log what URL's are being accessed thru proxy servers etc. It usually sets off alarm bells when the word "porn" comes up on that list with you as the person accessing it, and all it takes is for you to hotlink an image off a website, PG or not, to get someone into trouble. I implement that shit for a living, and I've seen how people get caught out.

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

d0p3y; seriously I couldn't care less what you think about my "complaining"... I'm simply pointing out something that has come to my attention over recent times (someone else could've started this thread; I just chose to do it myself)

And FYI; no user should have to disable anything or stay out of any section just so you can resolve your sexual frustration... if you like porn or porn-orientated images that much, go to a porn site - simple.

I stand by my initial comments and that of the other moderators, administrators etc. This is a automotive forum which ALLOWS for other sections; users like you abuse this right and ruin it for many others. I'm sure Prank will be very happy openning up HIS forum and seeing all that stuff.

Think about it from our POV, we're trying to tell everyone we're a warm and welcome community, which part of your "art" will be warm and welcoming to the female Skyline drivers huh?

Come on, little common sense...

As for viewing it at work; you'll find that many companies are lenient towards what staff can view - I've seen quite a few IT policies from many companies to prove so. However, never ever have I seen a policy which permits staff to view pornography.

Maybe you can try it at your next job; don't try and hide it either - just stream porn all day long and see what the others say.

Have a nice night.

We will ban you if you post any more girlie pics.

is that good enough a reason?

It wasn't. We allowed it as long as it was kept to a socially acceptable standard. I'm sure when you open up a mag like FHM you don't see someone writing an article called "check out this camel toe" with pics of chicks of said toe-age.

But someone (you) decided no, that you'd link to a porn site (the URL clearly bloody had "PORN" in it, so don't play innocent) with that stuff in it... after we clearly said that we'd allow the thread as long as it was kept clean. So we've put a stop to it.

Now, we give a foot of allowance, and you keep pushing for a yard, then its just easier to see you leave. As for most of the people on SAU, how about you stop with your childish need to see semi naked women, and we'll see how many people actually leave. Its a gamble we're willing to take.

You also have to remember that most employers log what URL's are being accessed thru proxy servers etc. It usually sets off alarm bells when the word "porn" comes up on that list with you as the person accessing it, and all it takes is for you to hotlink an image off a website, PG or not, to get someone into trouble. I implement that shit for a living, and I've seen how people get caught out.

1. I didnt start that thread, it was someone elses..

2. Banning me wont get u far, as i can just register under a different nickname if I really wanted to..

3. Employers that log into this site, DONT have to OPEN the SFN thread as they know it containts SEMI NAKED female pics, ur saying I want to see these pics, but obviously they do to if they are the ones opening the thread in the first place.

4. Rezz opened a thread in the wasteland earlier about 'camels toes', isnt that just asking for it? I duno but to me thats just provoking the whole situation..

5. Ur being a real a$$ about this whole situation and need to grow up, im not being a smart arse, i made 1 mistake with posting an image from a porn site and u get all shitty about it, before this Ive always kept it clean and havnt posted anything slightly pornographic..

1) not starting the thread - who cares? you among others too it too far

2) again, your point?

3) You dont understand logging do you?

Employers (mine included) log all traffic and check it based on "hot phrases" if something comes up, like the pic you posted... then my employer would be alerted to it and i would be questioned.

Why should i have to deal with that?

4) No its not at all, stop trying to make something out of nothing. Pity your most recent warning stopped us from adding another for your (yet again) poor posting/linking and ability to respect others.

5) You've done it more than once.

As i've said before, and say for the last time.

THIS IS NOT YOUR FORUM

1) not starting the thread - who cares? you among others too it too far

2) again, your point?

3) You dont understand logging do you?

Employers (mine included) log all traffic and check it based on "hot phrases" if something comes up, like the pic you posted... then my employer would be alerted to it and i would be questioned.

Why should i have to deal with that?

4) No its not at all, stop trying to make something out of nothing. Pity your most recent warning stopped us from adding another for your (yet again) poor posting/linking and ability to respect others.

5) You've done it more than once.

As i've said before, and say for the last time.

THIS IS NOT YOUR FORUM

1. cant the monkey speak for himself?

2. did i address u at any point in this thread?

3. does he need his mommy to stick up for him?

4. pathetic..

4) No its not at all, stop trying to make something out of nothing. Pity your most recent warning stopped us from adding another for your (yet again) poor posting/linking and ability to respect others.

give me 3 more warnings, please..

and dun make me get them the hard way.. im requesting only 3..

reason: umm, i like living on the edge.. :)

lol the more you post, the more the credibility seems to deminish. anyways... I have a drift event to get to, so I'm not gonna sit here and argue it out with you.

No more girlie pic threads, from you or anyone else. I hope that is as simple and clear enough a statement for you and everyone else in your boat to comprehend.

I'm not picking on you, but of all the people who posted in the girlie pic thread (the old one and the newer one), you were and continue to be the only one who seems to have an issue with it being not there, or at least the loudest protester anyways. Ironic since your pics were the sole reason we closed the new thread down, and have come to this predicament.

Power to the people and all, but nigga please. Enough. We've told you what is allowed, we aren't gonna discuss it anymore.

BTW, I don't run this forum, the mods do, so its their opinion that counts... so if I were you, I'd be paying attention to what R31Nismoid and the others have to say.

I think everyone should realise now rules are rules, it doesnt matter what the rules are or whoever makes them if you step outside the rules you will get punished.

Not only that.

You have to realise that this is a peoples forum, if a minority likes images as previously posted in SFN's and threads alike, doesnt mean the majority wont get offended does it?

Also another thing is, its not just people at work as an example that the mods are catering for for bringing in rules and the like? THIS is a PUBLIC forum, meaning the PUBLIC can access it at all ages, un restricted, so who would be the blame if the mods allowed those images to continue in these forums, and some school kid got introuble for accessing it?

Other points raised Previously also are true, Just because these images are easily accesible elsewhere, doesnt mean SAU has to follow suit, And as previously said, THIS IS a CAR related and technical Forum, we are trying to provide an excellent service to alot of people out there who are car enthusiasts. Not SCP enthusiasts

Cheers

A

Edited by Devils_Advocate21
We allowed it as long as it was kept to a socially acceptable standard. I'm sure when you open up a mag like FHM you don't see someone writing an article called "check out this camel toe" with pics of chicks of said toe-age.

I posted in the original thread but under the assumption it was exactly as funky said a socially acceptable thread much the same as a ralph or FHM mag. People did take it to far and the thread degenerated further towards smut with people seeing how far they could go... While I agree we are grown ups and should regulate our own actions and what we open or click on but the topic was a little misleading and even went off topic from the original purpose.... at the end of the day its the moderators jobs to do whats in the best in the interest of the group and this is the best solution as it's a car forum; and as most of us know there is plenty of porn on the rest of the internet to keep SAU clean of it.

Cheers

lolz at ^^^^. dude the thread was cool at the start when it was exactly wat the title sed. but y bring the scp in2 it? its not like we need to see those things here. theres a lot betta places to get them really. have some self control...

and plus give up wit the insults to the mods. i dont think they care and even if they do wheres it gonna gt ya? u'll just look petty to the rest of the ppl here.

im not tryin to stir the sh*t and im not tryin to diss but save ur pride bro and drop it. it really not that important

im not arguing or anything, its their forum not mine.. but ppl that come here are allowed to have an opinion.. Personally i really couldnt care less about the threads being closed, im not insulting anyone, they are tryin to make members (including me) feel insuperior just cause they have the power to ban or watever, and i think that THATS petty if anything..

if u have a problem with girlie pics, then just say so.. Dont open up a thread called 'Camles Toes' just to stir sh!t up and make things worse..

im not arguing or anything, its their forum not mine.. but ppl that come here are allowed to have an opinion.. Personally i really couldnt care less about the threads being closed, im not insulting anyone, they are tryin to make members (including me) feel insuperior just cause they have the power to ban or watever, and i think that THATS petty if anything..

if u have a problem with girlie pics, then just say so.. Dont open up a thread called 'Camles Toes' just to stir sh!t up and make things worse..

lol..your a dickhead... Are you even a paying member? What the shit are you talking about. Just stfu man..

Is it really worth it?

May I suggest as a female on this mans world forum :/ that perhaps have a soft porn thread as a sticky for all those inclined?

That way anyone who is at work and clicks on the thread is doing so knowing that its 'softporn...for those that can't help themselves' and cannot complain to mods about such things and those that like this sort of thing are also happy.

I entered the 'sexiest female names and google it' thread and was lucky enough to not see any norty girly pics(9that was a while ago now). And also read something along the lines of camel toes and decided not to go in there.

It is hard to know which thread is going to pop up with norty pics and which are clean.

There is also someone with a very boooby avatar which I dislike, but I just skip what he has to say lol

Kylie; as much as your opinion is important (especially from a female member), having a sticky thread specifically for this "softcore porn" is still unacceptable.

It will be like saying that the rules apply to all other parts of the forum BUT that thread... and when you link it back to the public forum point made above, it is still readily accessible either intentionally or un-intentionally.

The moment when someone comes up with a compromise that also adheres to the rules, I'm sure the Mods / Admin are going to listen :/

Lot of moral hypo-Criticism going on here.

if you want to get all My moral's are better than yours etc etc ... I had to BS and explain to my 4 year old daughter the other day about nismoid's Avitar and Satanic yours Scares her ok!!!...

Do i come here publicy whinging ... no I let others enjoy the place and understand this is a Well regulated interactive medium. No one wants Smut here but no one wants handcuffs either...

Ash thats just an example ok ... not having a shot and dont want it changed

lol..your a dickhead... Are you even a paying member? What the shit are you talking about. Just stfu man..

Is it really worth it?

alex u f**kstick, keep out of this, or next time i c u at a meet ill break ur f**kin nose u fag!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
×
×
  • Create New...