Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, i came across this website that says drifting is the fastest way through a corner, as opposed to proper entry, apex and exit. i think it's all a load of bull, cept for the drift techniques, which he probably ripped off from some other website. he also says heel and toe is not for corner entry, rather it is used IN the corner to hold the line and for exit speed.

have a read and tell me what u think.

www.geocities.com/go2iddrift

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/13798-is-this-a-load-of-bull/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I often wondered how the speed would compare around a small windy track.

Even though i have been told countless times its way slower to drift.

I seen some D1 cars pull 100 - 200 k's around corners on vids. Gotta wonder how a simlur car would go turning the bend.

But then if it was fast, they would race cars, rather than judge them.

Sorry, its crap. Drift is only spectacular, not fast.

A fast lap might have a *small* amount of under or oversteer, but not full on sideways. You do certainly use different techniques (trail brake, left foot brake, lift off, throttle etc) to alter the attitude of the car between the two, but the aim is to retain maximum grip, not to slide.

Only possible example where sliding is faster is in motorkhana, in very tight 1st & 2nd gear turns where flicking the tail round can help.

Obviously a different story on dirt/snow etc, where you'd have to go so damn slow to keep traction that its quicker to slide

Some classic quotes from that site:

"a good opponent that is using the drifting style will enter a corner at a much higher speed"

sure, but the whole point is that they'll leave the corner so much slower that on average they'll be slower. Corner entry speed makes little difference to lap times, its about mid corner speed, and most of all exit speed (since the additional speed is carried along the next straight).

"You cannot drift in a skyline, it produces too much torque and is virtually impossible to handle if you throw it into a drift, so unless you want to spin out and die, use the grip driving technique. "

I guess the author hasn't seen that lunatic fatz...and of course torque helps you spin the wheels.

"Jump Drift

In this technique the rear tire on the inside of a turn or apex is bounced over a curb to lose traction resulting in over steer. "

This description is 100% wrong. Its a handy technique in front driver car, you can hook the front tyre over the far side of the kerb to reduce/stop understeer. Won't create oversteer though.

But this is the scarey one, from his description of heel/toeing:

"While exiting the corner you will come out at a much faster rate because you have raised the RPM which slowly drops while going around the corner when you are not stepping on the gas."

He's suggesting that heel/toeing lets you keep revs up in the same gear you started with. In fact, it is simply to get the correct revs for a lower gear when you downshift. This means that the change down is smooth, minimising the chance of loosing traction due to locked driving wheels.

and all this time I thought the slow in fast out was the go...

think i'll put sprintcar wings on the M spec for Targa and back it in... better still forward this to Glenney Whitey Garwood Richards and Co.... that way us mortals wont look so slow

Later

I remember the Kart technique...some kid once said

"just dive on the brakes as late as possible and flick the bastard as quick as you can and gas her up. Aim for the ripple strips, hit them at the apex and gun it." Man karts ruled.... KT100J's ruled....

Son of Sydneykid

Guest DrDrift

Heel and toe is used when entering corners, dropping to lower gear so that the engine revv of the lower gear can match the higher speed of the wheel and this can prevent rear wheel lock up. Shift lock is the exact opposite, shocking the gears so that the revv cannot match with speed resulting in rear wheel lock up...just another way to go sidewaysssss.

Hey im kidna new here and dont realy know much bout racing a car round a drift track isnt drifting corner's faster then brakeing and and lining up the corner and all Plus i think the guy is talknig about jap drifting tracks that are flowing that would allow higher speed while drifting???

But that's my opinion (spelling????)

If drifting is faster then F1 driver will be going sideways. From what I think, drifting is good in a race if you wanna take different line through the corners and these lines are not the fastest. In most bends or corners, the quickest way to get through them is not the shortest possible line, it should be the straightest line where you can bring speed through it.

Drift entry can be fast but not exit and drifting is not about racing and who comes in first.

What- you're saying that f1 cars can't stand to rev? Last I heard the BMW was turning 19000 rpm so yeah I guess so....... If drift was quick then they would set f1 cars v8 supercars indycars etc up to drift. These guys know how to go fast and it aint drift . AS butters says if it was fast they would race and not judge them for style. Let's face it, it's a Japanese invention, and while they can build cars they ain't so good at pedalling them. (who was the last Japanese world champ in any 4 wheelled motorsport ?) (they CAN ride bikes though)

ok so with what your saying you can drive a car round this track faster tehn the guy drifting ????

http://www.blackiceyrage.net/car/dri_45.wmv

Btw there's a few other vid's of lines and stuff if ya wanna cehck em out i will be adding more when i have time to upload em ok :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Unless things that you want to do include reference to time. Simple Boolean logic is only good for digital inputs or analogues that have been thresholded into digitals. But unless you also have a timer function available (which would more ideally be located inside the program, rather than being forced to implement a timer outside the ECU and bring it in as a seperate digital for every time delay you want to implement), then you can't do some of the things that you might want to do. My PLC ladder logics are obviously littered with program blocks, because that's easier than building it all in ladder gates, but the most frequent of those program blocks is a simple timer, because you actually can't otherwise do that in ladder at all.
    • Log voltage. I'm suspecting the alternator. Or even maybe a bad earth somewhere. ie, seeing as it is rev dependent, I am thinking it is alternator dependent.
    • Yeah so N1 and any other larger than factory pump are pretty famous for pumping the sump dry...obviously we don't often get to spend 20 or 30 seconds at high rpm/full noise on the road so I'd still be suspicious that is what is happening here.
    • You are also getting pressure dips on gear shifts. They're just not dipping as far, but they're dipping quite below the amount of oil pressure you should be seeing, for how much RPM drops.   It quite little could be the oil pressure relief valve is starting to stick open a little/is slow to close.
    • Can you log battery voltage, and TPS, and put all four of those into a single image (even as split graphs)?   The oil pressure drops aren't following RPM as such. I'm intrigued if you may have a ground loop between different sensors. With the engine not running, log your sensors and for example cycle the throttle pedal. See if any sensor values flutter or move about. This won't be a perfect test either as the ECU won't be cycling all of its actuators like it would be while running. What EMTRON do you have? Do you have a link to the wiring guide for that ECU?
×
×
  • Create New...