Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

Not sure if there is a thread already about this but it seems that Shell have changed their fuel structure.

Optimax is now "Shell V power"

Optimax Extreme has been superseeded by "V Power Racing"

Reading through the brochure and web site it seems that V power racing is an upgrade rather than a rebadging of extreme/ Claiming that V power has a minimum of 100 RON but avereages 101+. This is a claim that extreme never made so it interests me...

Upgrade from Shell Optimax Extreme to new Shell V-Power Racing

I filled up my first tank last night and will let you know how it go's. I oly have a stock ECU though without a knock reading so my feedback will only be impressions and stuff. I guess we can all wait and see if SK will take up the challenge and do his full test on it on our behalf :(:P What i do know is that Extreme is now gone or at least on its way out.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138153-shell-v-power/
Share on other sites

I filled up with this stuff last weekend; the attendant was full explaining the changeover to me as I'd never heard of it before and thought it was some dodgy rip-off susbstitute :(

After one track day; pleased to say it goes good! but that could've been because of the AfterBurner product that I put in :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138153-shell-v-power/#findComment-2572508
Share on other sites

I love how they put in a low tax additive and charge us more for it.

Where did you get it Sam? I still haven't tried Extreme yet cos I haven't seen it at a servo I have been at.

Also, what a bunch of pansy arse, wanky featured, boyracer, bullshit names they have. It's enough to put you off buying it incase someone actually sees me filling up with it and starts laughing at me.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138153-shell-v-power/#findComment-2572715
Share on other sites

Hey Guys,

Not sure if there is a thread already about this but it seems that Shell have changed their fuel structure.

Optimax is now "Shell V power"

Optimax Extreme has been superseeded by "V Power Racing"

Reading through the brochure and web site it seems that V power racing is an upgrade rather than a rebadging of extreme/ Claiming that V power has a minimum of 100 RON but avereages 101+. This is a claim that extreme never made so it interests me...

Interesting, i read the brochure and their material safety data sheets and it seems to me as a rebadging.

Also optimax extreme claimed a minimum of 100 RON rating, including 5% ethanol.

Marketing hype. Thats all.

Same thing as unleaded 98 changed to optimax.

Edited by AndrewD
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138153-shell-v-power/#findComment-2572722
Share on other sites

i put it in my car the other day and it ran like shit.

It was probably your ecu playing with timing etc to adjust to the higher octane fuel. As far as I know 100ron fuel is common place in Japan and was probably used in alot of our cars prior to comeing to Australia anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138153-shell-v-power/#findComment-2572732
Share on other sites

How is new Shell V-Power Racing different to Shell Optimax Extreme?
New Shell V-Power Racing with FMT is an improved product compared with Shell Optimax Extreme. It contains Shell’s new Friction Modification Technology (FMT) and is designed to reduce friction in the engine, improve engine performance and responsiveness, and give improved acceleration right from the first tank

Above is the quote from Shell website.

Adam, The Shell on Wicks Road in Ryde sells it. Also the Shell on Epping Road (near Macquarie sells it). And if your ever in the city, the shell at Taylor Square/Oxford St sell it

I've been on extreme for nearly a year. Sometimes I change back to BP and can definitly feel the difference. Looking forward to what V power can do......

Here's a link to the FAQ's

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138153-shell-v-power/#findComment-2572734
Share on other sites

I dont sell why this fuel isnt cheaper than regular 98 octane????/

Its got 5% ethanol in it, which is a lot cheaper than petrol.. So really they are just ripping people off.

I have been using Boost98 from United petrol stations lately. Its 98 octane and it costs the same as regular 91 octance petrol, cause it had 10% ethanol. Thats the way it should be done, a good fuel for a cheaper price rather than a hyped-up fuel for a ridiculous price.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138153-shell-v-power/#findComment-2572737
Share on other sites

SK found along with a mag i read (hpi might of been..) that you really need a re-tune if you have a tuned ECU and are planning on changin to a fuel with etho in it, basically you can run more timing with the etho additive in it thus make more power across the rpm range however without the re-tune you'll make less power and the car will run more lean which is obviously horrible! lol

Anyone know if WA will ever get ANY 100 octane fuel.. :)

Edited by jazza08
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138153-shell-v-power/#findComment-2573061
Share on other sites

yup its good if you retune using that fuel....we use it in the race car and its better then any 98 octane fuel weve tried before it came out. Seriously who gives a shit about the name of the fuel...fuels fuel, they can call it whatever they want if its better then the low octane 'super lamo race fuel' ill use it regardless.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138153-shell-v-power/#findComment-2573162
Share on other sites

Hey Guys, I just filled a tank of Shell Optimax Extreme in my SII R33 and i only got a full exhaust... without even resetting the stock ECU i felt my car run 10 times better then BP ultimate and regular optimax.. not a single cough or stutter as others have stated... idle and acceleration feel much smoother...

Cheers,

Sarkis

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138153-shell-v-power/#findComment-2573771
Share on other sites

I guess we can all wait and see if SK will take up the challenge and do his full test on it on our behalf

Already on the case, started tuning for the new brew last week on the way to the airport to catch the plane to Bathurst.

On that same subject, I have been retuning the PFC in the R33GTST after we did SOME headwork on it (porting, larger exhaust valves and combustion chamber polish). I can’t believe how much ignition advance I can now add, in some places I have advanced it 15 to 18 degrees from the default settings. It is using load points now that it simply could reach before, particularly around 3,000 to 4,000 rpm.

As for fuel tuning, I am now starting to run out of injector duration and it is still a bit leaner than I would prefer. Maybe time to fit the Nismo adj fuel pressure regulator and the GTR fuel pump.

What I have noticed while tuning with Optimax Extreme is that it misfires when the ignition is too retarded. It misfires when the ignition is too advanced. It misfires when it is too lean. It misfires when it is too rich. When you get the tune close, the misfiring stops and it goes GOOD.

Keeping the above in mind, any retuning for V Power should be obvious.

:laugh: cheers :mad:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138153-shell-v-power/#findComment-2573892
Share on other sites

Hey Guys, I just filled a tank of Shell Optimax Extreme in my SII R33 and i only got a full exhaust... without even resetting the stock ECU i felt my car run 10 times better then BP ultimate and regular optimax.. not a single cough or stutter as others have stated... idle and acceleration feel much smoother...

Cheers,

Sarkis

Thats probably because your car was running rich due to the standard tune and the ethanol fuel helped to lean it out abit...which would make a car run better if it was running too rich...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138153-shell-v-power/#findComment-2573956
Share on other sites

hmmm possibly, how ever im running 8psi only and full exhaust... even on the dyno my car didnt make one puff of black smoke so i dun think its running rich... AFR was 10:1 from memory...

But you guys are right... its quite expensive

Unleaded: $1.10 per L

Optimax: $1.21 per L

Extreme: $1.36 per L

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138153-shell-v-power/#findComment-2574570
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
×
×
  • Create New...