Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just for a laugh.

1985 honda civic

890kg

1.6l DOHC ZC (not vtech yo) jap spec engine implant. 130HP at the crank from factory.

Mods: Extractors

rev cut 7500

15.5 down at WSID

100HP atw (75kw) lol at R31 club dyno day

Don't have it anymore.

i got a chrysler gallant

its got a custom exhaust (i cut it myself)

single down drought carbie(vacuum secondaries dont work)

and blown piston ring

"power" my guess bout 30kw at the rears lol

  • 1 month later...

Model - Swift

Engine - G13B

Modifications - Extractors, exhaust, cold air intake, BD14 cams, cam gears, Enlarged throttle body, group A chip, remapped ecu, dog box, msd coil set,

Dyno tune results 54kilowats before, 88 kilowats after

there was man other mods i just forget,

high 14 pass.

  • 3 weeks later...

put the pulsar on my mates dyno last night. made about 82kw, about 2kw down on what it made on a different dyno about 6 years ago. plenty of power left in it though. AFR's are mid 11's. now to convince the missus to let me put a nistune on it.....

  • 4 weeks later...
Engine:VQ35DE

Car: V35 Skyline Coupe

Mods: Z-tube and pop charger, Plenum spacer.

Power: 177rwkw.

Putting the Exhaust Headers on monday and a grounding kit. Will do a new Dyno run sometime next week. :P Hopping for 185rwkw

Finaly got the car on the dyno after getting the extractors and light wieght pulleys.

191rwkw now. Pushing for 200 :rofl2:

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Some history on the RB20DE in the rally car:

2082010122631pm.jpg

Come a long way from it's first run of 97.5kw!

Spec's are:

RB20DE (235,000km)

Independent throttles (4AGE)

Ported head

Cams (270 or 280° can't remember)

Link G4

8,400rpm Rev limiter inguaged 4176 times in 2 years. That's not counting bouncing off the limit either. Rev it much?! :)

Z32 NA with exhaust/extractors/pod/chip yielded 240kw

My R32 with similar mods dynoed 222kw.

Battling to extract more though.

Errrrm...i think you were meant to say horsepower...240rwkws is somthing like 320-330kws at the flywheel.

Errrrm...i think you were meant to say horsepower...240rwkws is somthing like 320-330kws at the flywheel.

I think he's just talking crap as a Z32 NA will all that wont make 240rwhp/rwkw in any case.

  • 2 weeks later...

Rb30e

Today I made:

97.5rwkw @ 120kph

321nm @ 88kph

Rev Limiter @ 6500rpm

Specs:

Stock RB30E

Stock Timing (+15)

91 Fuel

Extractors & 2.5" Exhaust, Stock Cat & 1 Muffler Before Diff

3" Intake Pipe, Cheap Pod, Custom Airbox & CAI.

Going to run it on 98 Fuel Next time & +20 Timing, aiming for 100rwkw, also need to sort out the issue with it running rich.

  • 4 weeks later...
94 r33

rb25de

stainless steel extractors, cat back, apexi pod.

95.7rwkw...

update today i got 101.7rwkw with new catbak and timing advance in 4th gear run

what size exhaust do you have from the headers? and what size from the cat back?

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Major thread necro but how bad of a job is it to DIY? Looking at it online it looks like if you reuse your ring and pinion as long as those are in good condition it should be fine to just pull the axles/front cover and replace the diff that way? Or should I be replacing everything and doing preload measurements/gear mesh testing like the factory service manual mentions for the rear diff?
    • in my list I had the R33 GTR as the best Skyline. Infact I had all GTR's (33>34=32), the NSX, the GTO, the 300ZX, the 180SX, the S15 better than the FD RX7. I had the MR2 and the A80 as 'just' better. I also think the DC5R Integra looks better but this is an 01 onwards car. I also think the FC>FD. It's almost like aesthetics are individual! The elements @GTSBoy likes about the FD and dislikes about the 180 are inverse in my eyes. I hate the rear end of the FD and it's weird tail lights that are bulbous and remind me of early hyundai excels. They are not striking, nor iconic, nor retro cool. The GTO has supercar proportions. I maintain these look much better in person (like the NSX) especially with nice wheels and suspension which is mandatory for all cars pretty much. Some (or all) of these you have to see in person to appreciate. You can't write a car off until you see one in the flesh IMO. Like most people we probably just like/dislike cars which represent certain eras of design or design styles in general. I also think the 60's Jag E type looks HORRIBLE, literally disgusting, and the 2000GT is nothing to write home about. FWIW I don't think the Dodge Viper Gen1's have aged very well either. You can probably see where I rate bubbly coupes like the FD. I know we're straying now but the C4 and C5 absolutely murder the Viper in the looks department as time goes on, for my eyes. Wouldn't surprise me if people who love the FD, also love the MX5, Dodge Viper, Jag E Type, etc etc.
    • I used to hate R31s, and any of the other Nissans that led up to it, and any of the Toyotas with similar styling, because of the boxiness. They were, and remain, childish, simplistic, and generally awful. I appreciate R31s a lot more now, but only the JDM 2 door. The ADM 4 door (and any other 4 door, even if they are unique compared to our local one) can eat a bowl of dicks. The Aussie R31 is also forever tarnished by their association with stereotypical bong clutching Aussie R31 owners of the 90s and early 2000s. I think the Nissans of the 70s (other than 120Y/180B/200B) are far superior looking to the 80s cars. The 240K era Skylines are boss. The same is broadly true of Toyotas. Hondas don't ever register in my thinking, from any era. Mitsus are all horrid shitboxen in any era, and so also don't register. Subarus are always awful, ditto. Daihatsus and Suzukis also don't generally register. They are all invisible. I think the SW20 MR2 looks fiddly. The 3000GT/GTO is like that but way worse. Too many silly plastic barnacles and fiddly gimmicks ruined what could have been a really nice base shape. Kinda-sorta looks like a big heavy ST165 Celica coupe (and I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing). I think the 180SX is dreadfully bland. It's not bad looking. But it has no excitement to it at all. It's just a liftback coupe thing with no interest in its lines, and bad graphical elements (ie wide expanses of taillight plastic on the rear garnish). The S13 Silvia is a little better - getting closer to R32 shapes. But still....bland. S14? Nope. Don't love it. S15...a little better. Probably a lot better, actually. Benefits from not being like a shrunk in the wash R34 (where the S13 was a shrunk in the wash R32 and the S14 looked like a Pulsar or something else from the stable on Nissan mid 90s horrors). The Z32 was hot as f**k when it came out but hasn't aged as well as the A80. Keep in mind that I think the R33 is the most disgusting looking thing - and out of all the previous cars mentioned is objectively closest to my precious R32. It's just....real bad, almost everywhere you look. And that is down to the majority of what was designed in the 90s being shit. All Nissans from that era look like shit. Most other brands ditto. In that context, the FD absolutely stands out as being by far the best looking car, for reasons already discussed. Going behind the aesthetics, the suspension alone makes it better than almost any other car.  
    • If they just called it the "Mazda Tiffany", it would have been spot on.
    • Yup but for me its the HR ! Cut my teeth on the old holden 6s in the day ! And here's me thinking in the day it was also the 300ZX and the Mitsubishi GT3000 ! All, as well had good lines, but always seemed to need finishing off, style wise.
×
×
  • Create New...