Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Which would you go for???ive got 2 options....

1) get splitfires, and hope that gapping at .8mm will work

2) regap my .8mm ngk's to .65mm, and hope it doesnt missanymore

either way will i lose a noticeable amount of power gapping from 0.8mm to 0.65mm????ive heard that too low a gap will slow the car down heaps???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138228-8mm-gap-vs-65mm-gap/
Share on other sites

As rev210 mentioned, it really depends on your power/boost and revs the problem is occuring at...

Assuming it's the usual Skyline misfire, my experience is that gapping the plugs down only somewhat resolves the issue in that it no longer misfires, but instead you get a lovely flat spot!

I bit the bullet and bought Splitfires, installed new plugs at 1.1mm gap...worked perfectly on my old R32 that was running 1.1bar at approx 170rwkw...No misses ever again, the car was incredibly smooth through the rev range and I did alot of k's with that setup...in fact, same story with my SII R33...

Gapping the plugs just masks the actual problem, which is a weakness in the ignition system...usually the coil-packs (cracked or compromised in some way).

Funny this exact issue has been going thru my head the last week.

I put the plugs in gapped at 0.66mm from the word go without ever running 0.8mm. Is it worth pulling them out, opening up the gap and checking to see if the spark blows out?

Brent.

If you are still running the stock turbo etc. then 0.8mm ought to work well enough all things being healthy.

get NGK BCPR6ES or BCPR6ES-11's , if you haven't already and gap them down to 0.8mm initially. These are copper plugs.

When gapping the plugs do not press the gap closed with the feeler gauge still in the plug gap like I have seen some young-un's do.

Have a good look over the coils for any hairline cracks or discolouration. I had an issue with one once and as a fix used generous amounts of high temp epoxy , it might be a temp fix depending on the extent of the cracks.

With the coil cover off you may be able to confirm an issue if in the dark you have a good look to see if there is any arcing.

They do get very hot under that cover and I wonder if nissan may have given them a snick too much dwell time for longevity. The extra dwell would help emmissions I'd imagine but does increase the heat at the same time and possibly reduces the coils lifespan.

Which would you go for???ive got 2 options....

1) get splitfires, and hope that gapping at .8mm will work

2) regap my .8mm ngk's to .65mm, and hope it doesnt missanymore

either way will i lose a noticeable amount of power gapping from 0.8mm to 0.65mm????ive heard that too low a gap will slow the car down heaps???

no you wont lose power. i have splitfires, and tried larger gaps, even 0.8 i got a few misses here and there, 0.7 works for me.

do the checks as mentioned.. i fixed a coilpack once with a tiny piece of electrical tape.

thanks heaps guys for the advise, i think im going to just go and buy some splitfires....i regapped my plugs to .66mm,and i still get the missing occasionally, but what is worst, my car has a huge flat spot which wasnt there beforehand, this is running 10psi

Is it true 1.1gap will be fine with splitfires or should i just buy pregapped .8mm ngks asadvised.

thanks alot guys

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...