Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Looks good, and toyota builds a stronger car than nissan .. sad but true..

But there has been rumours of this for a long time, and nothing has come of it. I believe Toyota has even flatly denied they will ever make another 'Supra'. This could just mean the similar concepts will be called something else, or they're simply nothing more than design ideas.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138269-the-new-supra/#findComment-2575880
Share on other sites

yeah they might not be calling it the supra, kind of like they won't be calling the new GTR a skyline

maybe they'll call it the RZ? given the last TT supra was a RZ supra wasnt it?

having owned a supra myself, i have a soft spot for them, and personally i think that looks absolutely amazing!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138269-the-new-supra/#findComment-2577486
Share on other sites

the rear lights on the supra i seriously do not like. everything else look wise looks awesome. i seriously dont even think it would need a bodykit but to imagin what a bodykit would look like on this would make it more interesting and possibly more appealing as well.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138269-the-new-supra/#findComment-2577508
Share on other sites

i like the prototype, looks hot, definately a good one, compared to the other i have seen of other vehicles.

it actually looks like a newer version of the old supra but modernised.

alot of new cars are looking way to crazy in design, a bit out there and they loose there sporty appeal and start looking like luxury cars not sports cars.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138269-the-new-supra/#findComment-2577784
Share on other sites

Its not hard to beat the 350Z - its underpowered and overweight.

That said, is the Supra even meant to be a Z competitor? I always thought that, as the flagship, it was meant to be a GT-R competitor. In my mind, its always been a step above. Maybe because the Z has always been second fiddle to the GT-R in Nissan's range, but the Supra is the range topper.

Maybe the LF-A will be the GT-R competitor, and the new Supra will be aimed at the Z.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138269-the-new-supra/#findComment-2578453
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...