Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

agreed ss8_gohan depending on the box, some actually engage each gear in time, some have minor delay which allow this but then theres obvious disadvantages to that.

Sir-D, My Nigah, same here but I drive a manual, mate between shifts and usually on a decent straigth run without shifting eh ?

flip the skirt up an dip the fingers for a bit of extra eh... gota luv that fresh wax feel.

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

here's a fun fact for ALL of you

you will never EVER be able to afford one of these things,

if you COULD afford one of these machines, you would be a FOOL to put it sideways. gt-rs have never been designed for that, as a matter of fact they have features to combat that,

ie: hicas, attessa, abs, being cool etc

just putting that out there

Your ability to comment on the financial status of other members on this board is bold, many on here can afford one, whether they choose to spend their money on the latest GT-R is another thing. Many choose to spend on real estate instead.

As an owner of a GT-R I can assure you that they do go sideways as will any car in the right situation. I do agree though, a GT-R is about grip and going sideways in one not the most common of activities for mine but when I am sideways I do like the ability to shift up a gear if needed.

it's fact, humans can't shift as fast a the top of the line auto boxes. period. DSG is arguably the best gearbox out there at the moment, something about 2 clutches, and having the next gear ready. Was it "borrowed" from maserati?

anywho, 997 Turbo turbo uses a slush box, one of the head tech dudes was quoted as saying something along the lines of 'it shifts quicker than any human can, so why not use it over a manual?" damn straight too.

Porsche invented the DSG gearbox back in the 60's, but they didn't like how harsh the shifts were. Its fine for the track, but they didn't feel it was smooth enough for the street. Now with better actuation and computer control its not an issue.

The 997 Turbo doesn't have a DSG because it weighs twice as much as a traditional auto, which is heavier than a manual 'box. But Porsche will release one soon, apparently.

And there's more to life than just a quick shift action. How about when it changes gear? As I said, I hate most of those Tiptronic gearboxes since they change gear for you. The Boxster I rented had a Tiptronic, and every time I got near redline it would auto change up. Frustrating when you've got your braking point lined up with the redline, and the thing just changes up on you and lunges forward as you're wanting to use the brakes.

I don't need a clutch, and I don't need to engage the gear myself. I just want to select the gear, and be the only contributor to when that selection is made.

ever had a flappy paddle gearbox equiped car sideways? when your hands are only a blur as you adjust steering angle it makes changing up a gear quite impossible.

Impossible for you, maybe. WRC drivers cope just fine. The manual lever turns into a handbrake at speed and they use the wheel-mounted controls.

The Peugeot WRC cars use two rings mounted to the steering wheel. One ring runs in front of the steering wheel, the other behind. So regardless of the position of your steering wheel, your gear change actuator is always in the same location. I think you pull the ring behind the wheel to change up, and push the ring in front of the wheel to change down.

PEUGEOT%20Interior%202.jpg

I just doubt any street car will run such a setup, but its a cool solution to the "how do we change gear when the wheel is all over the place?" problem people who travel sideways will always have. Its not a problem with the principle, just an issue with implementation.

Imossible was an over statement, it is damned awkward though. Do the WRC cars also have less turns for full lock then a street driven GT-R? That would make shifting up while turning easier.

That ring system that the Pug runs sounds awesome!

Everyone has their own opinion on the double-clutch vs. sequential vs. manual vs. CVT vs. auto vs. trained monkey debate, which is good because it will ensure there is plenty of choice for many years to come. For me, the head tells me that DSG is the way to go, but the heart will always love the feel of a good manual.

Porsche invented the DSG gearbox back in the 60's

Random fact: Actually, the twin/dual clutch gearbox was invented by Andolphe Kégresse in the late 1930s. It was meant for use in some random Citroen of the time, but never made it there. The PDK transmission was used on Porsche's Le Mans race cars, and a couple of Audi rally cars, but unlike modern DSG boxes they still ran an auto-trans style torque converter (so they cheated to get it working :laugh:).

mrbenno I agree with what you said about the boldness of his comments.

Just because you don't buy something doesn't mean you can't afford it. This is about the car, not about our ability to buy it or not.

f**k manuals, wake up its 2006... only cavemen drive manuals!

Obviously Nissan thought about performance when creating a GTR.

Soon manual gearboxes will be phased out altogrether, what you all gonna do then?

haha, autos are gheeey!

drive a car properly - manual all the way.

btw, i cant stand how the yanks say 'nissan'...........'nissuun'.

Imagine you're cruising at 70km/h in top gear (7th), but with full manual mode activated. For whatever reason, you feel like giving the car a boot (not suggesting for any minute that the reason might be another car in the lane next to you - I don't condone street racing :) ). So you want 2nd gear. Pull left paddle... 6th... pull paddle... 5th... pull paddle... 4th... pull paddle... 3rd... pull paddle... 2nd! Dunno, just seems a regular 6-speed box would be a little more practical there.

I see what you are saying, but sequential manual boxes are so fast that this is almost a moot point now. An F430 will go from 6th to 2nd faster than you can say "6th to 2nd", perfectly rev matched and ready to go. At the most you might lose 2 tenths shifting the sequential box down, but you would gain back the 2 tenths going up to 3rd.

I wouldn't be surprised if the car is offered with a 6 speed manual and 7 speed sequential. For you drifting and trackday guys, if you want to take $80,000 or so of cutting edge sports car, tear all the electronics and 4 wheel drive out of it, go for it. I'm not as confident in my ability to handle this type of car without aids except on a wide open track.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can also confirm these work a treat for most balljoints and bushes. If you have access to a big rattle gun, they make the job so much easier and quicker, compared to using a socket wrench or shifter on the c-clamp 👍
    • Its sort of street but got used for circuit sprints on account of I never drive it on the road because I dont have the time to spare. So it usage was sits around for months at a time then gets driven either 50 or 250 kms to the track followed by 20 laps followed by 50 or 250kms home followed by stuck in the shed until next time. So yeah neither fish nor fowl. Just dont want to break it on the track as a preference. Hence the fairly short sensor/mod list. Probably more worried about it pinging itself to destruction more so than anything oil related.
    • My thing I'd be doing, is pulling it out, and just getting the tune cleaned up for now. Before that even happens, checking over everything, like vac hoses, fuel hoses, etc. No point dropping thousands on sensors if the moment you start it back up all the oil leaks out, or it has massive vacuum leaks etc.   But really, to know what to do, depends on what your use case is. Hard core track car? Throw most sensors available at it. Street car, I'd probably just run oil pressure, oil temps, water pressure, water temp, probably fuel pressure too. I don't know exactly what the Link can handle and do with those though. And if it's mainly just to cruise the streets, rather than mountain runs, you can probably skip most of the above if you've already got them in as gauges and warning lights.   PS, inb4 "sell it and buy a modern sportscar"
    • Keen to see the turbosmart data, to date I've only seen negative things in terms of response for them. Very small sample size though.     Hawkins is a big advocate in his videos of the larger rear housings. I managed to make similar power with a lower spec motor on the smaller .8 rear, keeping decentish spool.  The people he works with now are big power cars compared to mine though, mine really is setup to drive around and enjoy.  I don't have any back pressure monitoring though, so couldn't say if its good or bad on my car, just that it does what I want it to do.   Future I want a higher compression more cubes motor to give a bit more bottom end and hopefully the new g35-1150 gets me to the 850 rear comfortably.  But maybe I won't due to exhaust back pressure.
    • No, I refuse to buy their cheap ass crap! I do need to order a bunch of different nuts/bolts to refill my nut/bolt wall though. Maybe you could go for a walk through Bunnings for me? (Or send me some stuff from your work? )   I really struggle to work out how the US standardised to Metric in what the 70s or 80s, and yet, half a century later, there's been little done to actually bring it into fruition. It truly baffles me    On the whole Fastenal thing, I went reading their site (My god they sell a lot of varied stuff!), and it seems like it really depends what store you're near if you can walk in and just grab a few small things, or if that branch is primarily distribution with only a small window of "counter time" available (if at all). That definitely makes it harder, as move locations and it drastically changes your ability for success   For things like your M6x1.0, if you want to work on your own Skyline, and you also have a "home workshop" I'd recommend setting yourself up a small Nut/Bolt wall/section. It doesn't even need to be big at all. Most things depending on the diameter, will be a specific pitch, like the M6x1, M5x0.7 etc. Bigger bolts is mostly 1.5, except for a small number of things and that will come down to torque. From memory bolts for the brake calipers (and other things that need a lot of torque) will end up being a 1.25mm pitch. Save up a few dollars, and order a range of nuts/bolts. If you want to minimise cost a little, buy something like M6 x 40, and M6x70mm (1mm pitch) in both. In addition, buy yourself an M6x1mm thread chaser. That way you have long bolts that you can cut down to size, and then chase the threads out. Funnily enough, I find what I'd pay here for ordering 5 bolts, I can pay about 50% more and you'll get 100 of them.   If that doesn't quite work out due to space / ability to buy plenty up front, then each time you need some bolts, order 100 of what ever you're getting. Put them in clearly marked containers. Over a few years, you'll acquire plenty of different sizes, and will end up ordering less and less. And the cost for 100 bolts won't be much more than you paid for your 5 you needed to order anyway  Just takes a little planning ahead, by investigating what nuts/bolts you'll need, and ordering them before doing the job.     Edit: If it's also primarily for working on just the Skyline, for some reason my brain is screaming that at some point, either Nissan, Nismo, (Or possibly a third party) was selling a "kit" of every nut and bolt in a Skyline, purely for people restoring/rebuilding. It'd likely be quite expensive, but would give you every/any nut/bolt you need for stock/factory things. I'm not sure if it's still available, or even if it actually fully came to market, it's just something niggling in the back of my brain that you could look into further if that sort of thing interested you? (It might have been for the R32 GTR or something specifically too, and not just any Skyline)
×
×
  • Create New...