Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys and gals,

Just got a tank full of Shell's V POWER and I don't know whether the cold night air is doing wonders or the new fuel is actually quite good. Apparently, this fuel was developed and used extensively in Europe on Ferraris and other exotics and is only recently appearing in petrol stations here in QLD at least....try it next time and tell us what you think.

Cheers

Kwei

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138705-shell-optimax-replacement-v-power/
Share on other sites

from what i've read of their literature etc, it seems that it's basically just optimax and optimax extreme with 'friction modifiers' added.

the name V-Power is what it is called in Europe/most of the rest of the world, so i think they just re-named it to bring it in-line with the other countries, so now they only have to market one product instead of 2

I use to use Optimax, but since thats been replaced by V-Power I'm use that now, I've found a few diffrences with the engine running smoother etc, although I did a service on the car around the same time I started using V-Power.

Anyways, they say it's better then Optimax, almost the same just a few minior changes to the fuel.

R33MidnightRacer

Optimax = V-Power

When the name changed the product code for the fuel remained the same, it also uses the same tanks underground and they didnt clean them out or anything.

Thats because its the same fuel, just re-branded...

Optimax = V-Power

When the name changed the product code for the fuel remained the same, it also uses the same tanks underground and they didnt clean them out or anything.

Thats because its the same fuel, just re-branded...

I was told by one of the people working at Shell, they have minior changes ? :)

Tis the same fuel...

http://www.shell.com/static/au-en/download..._Power_msds.pdf

http://www.shell.com/static/au-en/download...optimax_tds.pdf

There is the hazchem data sheet on both fuels... Tell me there different...

There chemical compersition is identical, therefore my conclusion their the same fuel...

Ok just went and filled up on 3/4 tank of v-power...

$105.9 at Aspley Shell

Anyways i asked is it an optimax replacement... They said "YEs, and its better." I said "better how", the guy said "its just better" with a look on his face of this guy is a knob...

Ok just went and filled up on 3/4 tank of v-power...

$105.9 at Aspley Shell

Anyways i asked is it an optimax replacement... They said "YEs, and its better." I said "better how", the guy said "its just better" with a look on his face of this guy is a knob...

yeah exactly, they dont get taught why its better, they just get taught to tell ppl its newer so its better.

monkeys man monkeys!

i heard one guy trying to tell some rich lady in a merc that the opitmax was the best on the market

and she shouldnt use any other products and stuff from other companies... i just laughed bcoz she was hanging off his everyword.....

of course hes gonna say its the best bcoz he works for them derrr!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • In a few years from now, you'll regret that. It'll eat away at you, knowing the truth of the ugly hiding beneath the beautiful exterior... 😛
    • I don't think the G2 profile is particularly dangerous for the engine per se, more just are you actually ok with the turbo lag trade-offs? If the answer is yes then go for it. I personally don't think I'd be ok with it because I spend so much time at lower RPMs and I really enjoy the feeling of being able to stay in 5th gear on the highway and just roll into the throttle to get boost. Or staying in 3rd gear on "gentle canyon cruises" without feeling the turbo lag too badly. The 525 pump should be able to run flat out on factory lines but I would bet the pressure drop from pump to regulator is quite impressive. I don't know how much it would be exactly but I've seen figures like 30 psi thrown around.
    • It's interesting seeing everyone talk about what level of risk they are happy to tolerate.  Building a GTR always has a level of risk, you could be that lucky guy that drops 20k on the engine build alone and still has the thing go pop on the dyno. Life is fun like that.  The way I see it, the thing is a toy to be enjoyed. I'd be happy to turn up the power on stock motor and limit the risk with sensible tuning and engine protection. If it still goes pop, it is what it is. The car isn't a daily driver so it can happily sit while a plan is made to sort it out.  Given this thing will be a street car only, I really feel it's worth the (relatively small if managed well) risk to turn the power up to around 350KW on e85.  I don't think anyone getting into the skyline game now is doing it out of logic. Surely it is a purely emotional decision so I'm not sure how important it is to think about the engine build logically. The heart wants what it wants.  @joshuaho96 little note for Josh, I run my 525 pump flat out all the time and through the factory lines without any issues. (excluding the melting connectors, that's sorted now. we'll pretend it never happened lol)
    • But the Nexus S3 is very expensive and won't be as purpose-built for the application as a separate electronic boost controller :^) More seriously my pet issue here would be that the Walbro 525 running at 100% duty cycle is going to require more FPR than the stock setup can handle. I'm also pretty sure from what I've seen elsewhere you might want to slow down the pump regardless unless you're going to come up with some way of upsizing the fuel lines coming from the fuel tank. Factory 8mm fuel line doesn't actually flow very much if you want to keep pressure drop down between the fuel pump outlet and FPR. If you really want to "keep it simple" I would run only as much pump as you need and source a fuel pump controller to slow down the pump in the vain hope of being able to run stock-style FPRs which are pretty dinky. Or just use the HICAS lines and it should be mostly fine. OP should also really think hard about what profile they'd want out of the turbo. My pet choice here would be the G1 profile rather than anything higher power but YMMV. I already think ~stock turbo lag is pretty bad so I don't want to make it worse. In "gentle canyon cruising" I found that I spent a lot of time around 4-4.5k RPM. I also recommend DIYing labor if you're detail-oriented enough. Costs are high for labor + if you do it yourself you can be your own quality control.
    • GTSBoy is again on the money. My actual advice? Sell the car. (really). For what it's worth as is, you can sidegrade into something much better. If you care about function then this is the actual move. If you want a Skyline to perform, set aside about $100K to do it. This is NOT a typo. You will see right away these are two very different mindsets. Realistically we're talking full restomod for any Skyline still kicking around. Have an honest think about which one you are.. and what you want to do, and how much you want to invest in this (with no return).
×
×
  • Create New...