Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Installation has been confirmed! :P

So the question is now: whos used one of these before on an RB25DET and what setting did you use? Or do I have to jump onto a dyno and individually test each one?

Cheers,

Andy

Edited by OnGsTa
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138797-installing-hks-fcd-question/
Share on other sites

I thought I was right. :P

So just put the FCD "in between" the ECU and AFM right?

Hmm since we're on the topic, if it just keeps the AFM voltage at say.. ~4-4.5V what effects will this have? Leanning out of the car?

Unique Auto Sports has useful guide i think that may help ...

i was looking at doing this mod to my car in the near future as i have a boost controller, fmic, and 3in split dump + metal cat goin on soon and from what i've read people have been getting great result from these FCD's (up to 37rwkw's!!)

If i do it I will have them install it ...

only problem is i have always been fairly sceptical of signal benders they kinda scare me.

neway will be interesting to see your results ... post em up after you install it!!!

end rant. :P

Unique Auto Sports has useful guide i think that may help ...

i was looking at doing this mod to my car in the near future as i have a boost controller, fmic, and 3in split dump + metal cat goin on soon and from what i've read people have been getting great result from these FCD's (up to 37rwkw's!!)

If i do it I will have them install it ...

only problem is i have always been fairly sceptical of signal benders they kinda scare me.

neway will be interesting to see your results ... post em up after you install it!!!

end rant. :P

Got a link to this guide? :ninja:

I doubt the gains will be that much but I'd say it'd be a fair impovement if all you are getting is Rich and Retard once boost is increased.

Having said that I just installed my boost controller and have yet to tune it, so once I will I'll see when R&R kicks in and if so will install the FCD and get a dyno run/tune afterwards. :ninja: Will be sure to post results.

addy is www.nismo.com.au

umm its in parts>gts>electronics>fcd bout half way down

to lazy to look but if you can't find it let me know

one of the guys from hot4's put a hks fcd on his 34 GTT and got 37rwkw's <-- no joke

a fuel cut defender will add no power

it has no capcity nor does it do anything to "add power"

all it does is clamp the afm voltage so that the stock ecu doesn't hit its rich and retard protection.

ok my bad then hot4's magazine is printing falsified stories ...

darn i knew i shouldn't trust everything i read!!!

wouldn't stoping the rich and retard mechanism grant a gain in power (along with added boost, and supporting modifications) or am i wrong to assume this?

no the "added boost" and "supporting modifications" is making the car make more power or "add power". the fuel cut defender is exactly that, a cut defender and its nothing related to fuel cut. its an excess airflow protection over ride device. magazines sometimes do get stuff wrong, or word it incorrectly.

it clamps the afm voltage at some point in a hope to avoid the stock ecu activating its excess airflow protection.

it doesn't do anything at all. it doesn't smooth out the power or change it. it wont add 10rwkw or 1rwkw. it simply clamps the afm voltage when it goes near its peak value.

what happens is as you driving the airflow meter shows to the ecu how much air is coming in. when the value gets high on certain rpm levels (say near 4.5v, max is 5v) the ecu goes hmmm too much air is coming in, something must be wrong so it activates the rich and retard protection, to protect the engine. the result is a flat feeling and probably pops and farts out the exhaust. the ecu dumps timing and richens itself up to all buggery in a hope to make sure the engine is safe.

the fcd or "fuel cut defender" sits in between the afm and the ecu and says ok when i see 4.2v or higher (or something to that affect) ill actually tell the ecu its always 4.11v and won't tell it anymore that than.

so the engine runs along power comes on, air is coming in, goes to 4.11v and the fcd clamps the voltage and says to the stock ecu, hey its still 4.11v keep going, so the stock ecu does and thus you work around the stock rich and retard protection as the stock ecu never see's the higher afm voltages.

it wont magically add power or make the ecu think it can make more power.

there are similar devices like the apexi safc that do the same thing but they actually bend the afm signal to show less air is coming so that ecu goes ok so i see 3.1v of air but in actual fact there is really 4.2v of air so it uses more advanced timing and leaner fuel mixtures and as a result you make power.

there is no logical reason you would make more power by installing an FCD and nothing else. the only time you would see this sort of gain is if you are maxing hitting the rich and retard protection. and in this case the modifications that are on the engine, are causing it to make more power, as airflow makes power. the FCD is just tricking the engine to not activate its self protect mode

I think i understand the mechanics of these devices ...

but I'm not sure about the power thing ...

when the rich and retard protection kicks in it makes a dip in power ... the fcd's stop this from occuring don't they ? ... if they stop the dip in power would n't it give you a gain in power at certain points through the rev range and a smoother power delivery throughout the rev range, even on a standard car?

or is an fcd a waste of money?

Paul's got it right Chris. Funny thing is I just bought that edition the other day and have been reading it today, the reason why they 'gained' power was due to the fact that they were hitting rich and retard (as Paul stated) thus giving them a very dodgy power curve.

Have a look at the redline curve in the graph they put in the magazine, as soon as the power starts to build up, it suddenly dips because R&R is occuring - therefore limiting power.

So once they installed the FCD and eliminated the R&R problem, a natural power build up was able to be achieved and thats how they peaked at 197kw compared to the R&R limited 151kw.

Wasn't implying anything about debating mate. :P I was just confirming/agreeing with what Paul said, to give you a better understanding.

Yep you do pick up power where before the R&R limited it, but what Paul is trying to say is that theoretically it doesn't ADD any power as say a bigger turbo would. All it is doing is 'allowing' the car to make a natural progressive power run without the limiting of R&R, which in this case is producing more power then when it was limited by R&R.

Its the same as an frount mount intercooler, fitting one doesn't actually INCREASE power. But if you're stock one is restricted and therefore limiting your power from its true potential, a bigger intercooler removes that restriction and in that sense ALLOWS your power to be increased but doesn't actually increase it.

P.S - don't worry about hi-jacking. It's all good mate, the forum is for the community to use. :ninja:

Edited by OnGsTa

I've looked and experimented with the DFA in the past Adriano, but as the DFA will end up costing $100 for unit+controller and another ~$200 for tuning it ends up costing a fair bit more then the <$100 solution to remove R&R. :)

Well since Installation has been confirmed! :laugh:

The question is now: whos used one of these before on an RB25DET and what setting did you use? Or do I have to jump onto a dyno and individually test each one?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, that's grim. Something bad has been happening there.
    • Put an endoscope down the hole and saw this. Not quite all around the bore but a good 60% at least. Chin to the chest and towards further disappointments I guess.
    • 2 does "sort of" applies, maybe......but looking at what parts would be needed for the swap to get engineered, registered, and insured, and basically that's everything under the car, the modifications the make it legal would be problematic and horrendously expensive, all for a street car that just cruises around and hits a few twisty roads on the weekends Also, from looking at the NSW rules and Regs, with all modifications that is required just to make the car safe and not twist itself to pieces, and then actually get registered for street use, may still be impossible nowadays As for 1, when you add in a fresh engine, fresh transmission, rear cradle and diff, tailshaft, suspension, brakes, cooling, and all the other fabrication required, your probably looking at up to $100k to do it right, all for a 20 year old MX5 that is over engineered and you would never be able to actually use the power it has on the street, much like your beastie, which I love, but you actually track that thing and can use all of its powers in anger, in a safe environment  Hell, the old Bogan Cruise Ship had more power than I could use on the street, and in hindsight, I went a bit silly on that thing, it didn't really need the 500hp it had for what I actually used the car for, it was fun, but basically unusable on the street if you value your licence  As for cams, yeah, I'll probably book it in for them to get installed and tuned soonish, like next month after MX5 Mania are back at work....... and yes, I've already sent a email to bin the turbo quote and quote instead to install cams and a new Fluidampr balancer that will suit the 2.5 better than the OEM 2.0 balancer that is swapped over for the 2.5 install, as the balancer needs to get pulled to time the cams it's a while your in there sort of thing I did think a bit about flex fuel for a laugh, but being na, and no where really around locally anymore to get E85, I've binned that idea, so no sweet sweet corn smells are set for the car I wish E85 was more of a standard fuel, it's better for the environment, better for tuning, plus that sweet sweet smell we all love As for fitting in the family, that's not needed, as everyone in the family already owns a car that can seat 5 humans comfortably enough, the MX5 is "my toy" As for buying a car that is already built, nah, I would rather pick and choose my parts, I enjoy the process, and in the big picture, the additional cost is well worth the enjoyment, and the occasional frustration, I get out of doing it, albeit with other people spinning the spanners, and me, just paying the invoice 🤣
    • Excuse me, but 2) does apply 1) Would also apply if you consider how much is spent in the alternatives. Also there's the option of 3), buy one pre-built that you can put your family in (it's me, it's my car)   That said, I went on a ~500km drive the other day. I didn't use anything more adventurous than 3rd/4th gear at about ~3000RPM and 50% throttle and I was going as fast as anyone has any sense doing on a public road, with enough grip to the point where I didn't want to go any faster. I was obviously under the limit of the current car etc etc. MX5 with 2.5 N/A to achieve the same speed would be more fun for any road scenario. Maybe consider cams. I wouldn't boost it. The use case is just not there and it won't actually make the car more enjoyable unless you really do plan on wringing gears from 1st to 3rd (at least) at 100% WOT on a public road to 150+kmh.
    • Great if: 1. You had all of the money for everything else that is required  2. Lived in a country where you could actually do this and drive it legally on the road Sadly, neither applies to me As for the turbo, I am having second thoughts, mainly for engineering/registration legality reasons and insurance  Not saying I've finished doing stupid things that I probably should do to the MX5, but boost, and V8 engine swaps isn't on the cards Strange, but true 
×
×
  • Create New...