Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Installation has been confirmed! :P

So the question is now: whos used one of these before on an RB25DET and what setting did you use? Or do I have to jump onto a dyno and individually test each one?

Cheers,

Andy

Edited by OnGsTa
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/138797-installing-hks-fcd-question/
Share on other sites

I thought I was right. :P

So just put the FCD "in between" the ECU and AFM right?

Hmm since we're on the topic, if it just keeps the AFM voltage at say.. ~4-4.5V what effects will this have? Leanning out of the car?

Unique Auto Sports has useful guide i think that may help ...

i was looking at doing this mod to my car in the near future as i have a boost controller, fmic, and 3in split dump + metal cat goin on soon and from what i've read people have been getting great result from these FCD's (up to 37rwkw's!!)

If i do it I will have them install it ...

only problem is i have always been fairly sceptical of signal benders they kinda scare me.

neway will be interesting to see your results ... post em up after you install it!!!

end rant. :P

Unique Auto Sports has useful guide i think that may help ...

i was looking at doing this mod to my car in the near future as i have a boost controller, fmic, and 3in split dump + metal cat goin on soon and from what i've read people have been getting great result from these FCD's (up to 37rwkw's!!)

If i do it I will have them install it ...

only problem is i have always been fairly sceptical of signal benders they kinda scare me.

neway will be interesting to see your results ... post em up after you install it!!!

end rant. :P

Got a link to this guide? :ninja:

I doubt the gains will be that much but I'd say it'd be a fair impovement if all you are getting is Rich and Retard once boost is increased.

Having said that I just installed my boost controller and have yet to tune it, so once I will I'll see when R&R kicks in and if so will install the FCD and get a dyno run/tune afterwards. :ninja: Will be sure to post results.

addy is www.nismo.com.au

umm its in parts>gts>electronics>fcd bout half way down

to lazy to look but if you can't find it let me know

one of the guys from hot4's put a hks fcd on his 34 GTT and got 37rwkw's <-- no joke

a fuel cut defender will add no power

it has no capcity nor does it do anything to "add power"

all it does is clamp the afm voltage so that the stock ecu doesn't hit its rich and retard protection.

ok my bad then hot4's magazine is printing falsified stories ...

darn i knew i shouldn't trust everything i read!!!

wouldn't stoping the rich and retard mechanism grant a gain in power (along with added boost, and supporting modifications) or am i wrong to assume this?

no the "added boost" and "supporting modifications" is making the car make more power or "add power". the fuel cut defender is exactly that, a cut defender and its nothing related to fuel cut. its an excess airflow protection over ride device. magazines sometimes do get stuff wrong, or word it incorrectly.

it clamps the afm voltage at some point in a hope to avoid the stock ecu activating its excess airflow protection.

it doesn't do anything at all. it doesn't smooth out the power or change it. it wont add 10rwkw or 1rwkw. it simply clamps the afm voltage when it goes near its peak value.

what happens is as you driving the airflow meter shows to the ecu how much air is coming in. when the value gets high on certain rpm levels (say near 4.5v, max is 5v) the ecu goes hmmm too much air is coming in, something must be wrong so it activates the rich and retard protection, to protect the engine. the result is a flat feeling and probably pops and farts out the exhaust. the ecu dumps timing and richens itself up to all buggery in a hope to make sure the engine is safe.

the fcd or "fuel cut defender" sits in between the afm and the ecu and says ok when i see 4.2v or higher (or something to that affect) ill actually tell the ecu its always 4.11v and won't tell it anymore that than.

so the engine runs along power comes on, air is coming in, goes to 4.11v and the fcd clamps the voltage and says to the stock ecu, hey its still 4.11v keep going, so the stock ecu does and thus you work around the stock rich and retard protection as the stock ecu never see's the higher afm voltages.

it wont magically add power or make the ecu think it can make more power.

there are similar devices like the apexi safc that do the same thing but they actually bend the afm signal to show less air is coming so that ecu goes ok so i see 3.1v of air but in actual fact there is really 4.2v of air so it uses more advanced timing and leaner fuel mixtures and as a result you make power.

there is no logical reason you would make more power by installing an FCD and nothing else. the only time you would see this sort of gain is if you are maxing hitting the rich and retard protection. and in this case the modifications that are on the engine, are causing it to make more power, as airflow makes power. the FCD is just tricking the engine to not activate its self protect mode

I think i understand the mechanics of these devices ...

but I'm not sure about the power thing ...

when the rich and retard protection kicks in it makes a dip in power ... the fcd's stop this from occuring don't they ? ... if they stop the dip in power would n't it give you a gain in power at certain points through the rev range and a smoother power delivery throughout the rev range, even on a standard car?

or is an fcd a waste of money?

Paul's got it right Chris. Funny thing is I just bought that edition the other day and have been reading it today, the reason why they 'gained' power was due to the fact that they were hitting rich and retard (as Paul stated) thus giving them a very dodgy power curve.

Have a look at the redline curve in the graph they put in the magazine, as soon as the power starts to build up, it suddenly dips because R&R is occuring - therefore limiting power.

So once they installed the FCD and eliminated the R&R problem, a natural power build up was able to be achieved and thats how they peaked at 197kw compared to the R&R limited 151kw.

Wasn't implying anything about debating mate. :P I was just confirming/agreeing with what Paul said, to give you a better understanding.

Yep you do pick up power where before the R&R limited it, but what Paul is trying to say is that theoretically it doesn't ADD any power as say a bigger turbo would. All it is doing is 'allowing' the car to make a natural progressive power run without the limiting of R&R, which in this case is producing more power then when it was limited by R&R.

Its the same as an frount mount intercooler, fitting one doesn't actually INCREASE power. But if you're stock one is restricted and therefore limiting your power from its true potential, a bigger intercooler removes that restriction and in that sense ALLOWS your power to be increased but doesn't actually increase it.

P.S - don't worry about hi-jacking. It's all good mate, the forum is for the community to use. :ninja:

Edited by OnGsTa

I've looked and experimented with the DFA in the past Adriano, but as the DFA will end up costing $100 for unit+controller and another ~$200 for tuning it ends up costing a fair bit more then the <$100 solution to remove R&R. :)

Well since Installation has been confirmed! :laugh:

The question is now: whos used one of these before on an RB25DET and what setting did you use? Or do I have to jump onto a dyno and individually test each one?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wow guys thank you very much for the HUGE info :-) @GTSBoy I have like 30 minutes if test drive with that car/engine and it not stalled once. IMO it ran very smooth so i guess it was not that bad(but asi i said it is stock) That atmo BoV is worse than no BoV or in my case or it is/will be the same? Cuz frankly i rather have little whooosh sound than that sututu 馃槃 But either way the less harmfull for engine/turbo the better(if the stock is not an option right away) Yeah about that rebuild i talk with guy who will be doing swap and custom pipes...i think i can get stock BoV or get aftermarket which will function the same. Yeah i looked at that R35 option and i try ask my mechanic more about that if he knows. The engine has stock ECU but i can get Nistune for it. On that stock it runs quite well...but i have limited time with it so rly dont know. Ecumaster is this https://www.ecumaster.com/  It is not some dodgy backyard ECU :-)  @MBS206 Yeah but it will be better to have Nistune than the completely stock ECU no? About that "same" atmo/no BoV. The drivebility would be the same? I dont know but i kinda guess that amto BoV would cause more problems than no BoV in my case? Or is the same? You just "change" one sound for the other? Yeah i read many many many topic about hurting the turbo. But no one know anybody that would 100% tell that his turbo/engine blows/get damaged by not running BoV. Of course turbo would be little happier IMO if it has BoV ..but if you do not trash i think i should be good. And as you can see iam already trying to get this right...just working what i have right now :-) Yeah iam kinda the same...i dont want nothing loud and frankly iam not liking that sututu noise that much 馃槃 i rather have little bit of "whooosh" or no sound at all. Of course in my case it si a completely another world when you came tu Turbo car with open air box and no BoV and you driving the N/A ...all i hear is engine. Here? I heard turbo/sucking and that sututu 馃槃 @Yeetus So in my case it is really no difference to run no BoV or some atmo BoV like GReddy FV2? The car would drive the same and has "the same" little problems? As i wrote above i kinda thinked that atmo BoV with stock MAF would cause more problems...but then again i dont know much about no BoV either :-)  So to avoid stalling i "cant" just put neutral on stop lights like from higher rpm? Or? Yeah iam already looking for ECU :-)  Yes iam at the same side with thar R35 MAF :-)  @Dose Pipe Sutututu Thank you i (my mechanic/tuner) will look into that) Guess iam taking the Nistune at least :-) 
    • Here's the workaround with Nistune I was talking about, just add in more timing on the decel table And play around with the fuel cut & recovery, it's enough to stop it from stalling on a decel  
    • Hi Apex and welcome! 
    • Probably too late to reply to this, but worth a try. It's not calliper flex, the calliper as a whole is moving so it has to be calliper mounting bracket flex.  Calliper mounting brackets are designed to stop the calliper rotating, they don't need to be designed heavy duty to stop the calliper moving in and out.  Whatever it is is not the major cause of poor pedal feel, the outer pistons are moving towards the disc rotor the same amount as the inner pistons are moving away from the disc rotor.  Hence no change in fluid usage, what extra fluid is needed to move the outer pistons is recovered from the inner pistons. For a calliper to move as a whole by far the most common reason is the rotor is not perfectly centred in the calliper.  The first thing I check is that hub face is perfectly clean, bare metal, where the rotor hats contacts it.  Then I check the that rotor is firmly held in place by at least 3 wheel nuts (or equivalent). If all of the above are confirmed to be in perfect alignment then I would check the piston sizes and ensure that the 3 inner pistons and 3 outer pistons have matching diameters (eg; 28/32/36mm).  I have seen a no name 4 spot calliper that had 1 of the 4 pistons a different diameter. Maybe I missed it, are both the callipers exhibiting the same problem? I would remove the transfer pipe and inspect it to make sure that there are no restrictions. Maybe you already have but if not I would return them with the video and have them confirm all of the above.   Hope that helps Cheers Gary    
    • If you have the original log book and it didn't have a chassis number quoted, then no money required.  I have "rechassied" a number of race cars, no problem as long as you have the original log book.   Cheers Gary
  • Create New...