Jump to content
SAU Community

  

126 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

I have not driven 350rwhp car Ive been in 1 with 430rwhp..

just to clarify..the 500rwhp is a part time...I'm choosing ECU with 2 map memory to switch back...500 is only for dyno..just the figures..normal driving, I'd stick with 350...

the efficiency curve for 500rwhp with a GT35 is crap, I think boost kicks in about 4000-4500 rpm....

no boost

no boost

no boost

no boost

suddenly

kabaam...

bang..crash and die..

I voted for 500rwhp because I value performance over bling. My old 33 made a touch over 400rwhp but looked like a lowered stocker with cooler, tinted windows and 17s.

As long as the car is tidy, give me stock body/interior over white leather, neons, stereo, massive wings and the like. My personal preference is for understated before an enormous body kit.

I had 350rwhp & now it's been rebuilt with forgies, gtr rods etc so it's a bit of both. That said I don't really want a sound system & better rims aren't a necessity for me.

All go no show for me (except under teh bonnet)

Yeah im with the go for 500rwhp

even though i have a 300rwhp car, but its gettin tuned to go to 350rwhp

next week.

Just depends what you like doing.

Like cruising around listenin to ya tunes fairly loud, and still being able to go pretty quick.

Or, have a car that can pull 11's down the quarter, have a feeling that you could beat anyone on the street that annoys you.

M preference is 500rwhp, just sounds like a bigger archievement, then nice wheels,nice interior and a sound system.

All comes back to, are you trying to pull chicks, or trying to pull yaself from sinking into the seat.

sound system haha what a f**king joke? what idiot spends 10,000 on a sound system (im sorry but it is just stupid), maybe so other pedestrians can listen to ur rap/dance music? rims are good once you have the power to get it all down to the ground. i would hands down go the rebuild for 500rwhp. without a doubt.

Muscle car... equals http://www.kerbeck.com/kerbeck/kerbeck.nsf...LE/DSC05872.jpg

If i could afford this 10k on a rebuild would be the least of my problems. Altogether now 427 cubic inches ;)

18" wheels and bright leather interiors are good for some, but if its going to be a cool show/cruiser then this is where its at ;)

1932-Ford-Red-n-f-pipes-le.jpg

Imports are good for cheap performance, if you want cool you should have stolen your grandfathers car ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's a good point. The rears of the covers themselves have no baffling at all though. Higher up more chance of air for venting the crank case. Lower on the side more likely to be submerged. I might be able to fit them on the sides but with both the sump drain fittings being on the drivers side the passenger one will need to make a U Turn and be nearer the turbo. But it will look neat being not up on top.
    • It won't likely matter where along the cam covers you put the big fittings. I would suggest putting them on the sides if you can, simply because it will reduce the flow up through the baffles and thus reduce the amount of oil that gets put into the foam. It might not matter, but it seems like something to consider as a worthwhile thing to avoid.
    • Well, I have my IM240 results with a cammed LS1... My Nox was 0.11 and my CO g/km was 0.2. Euro4 is 0.08 and 0.1 respectively. I'm gonna say for a stock RB this is actually plausible, BUT in Australia they were complied pre-Euro2, so the limits were: Which as you can see, is way higher. I'd say a stock RB with a new OEM Cat could? actually pass Euro4 for NOX but you'd probably have to do a hell of a lot of testing to prove it, and getting a car emissions tested and carrying a certificate of emissions when/if you get pulled over may be cost prohibitive if it's even allowable to get your car tested and re-classified. You'd have to find out what the UK Govt is using as reference material. It may be non-negotiable.
    • I made a little more progress last night and added some E85 safe fuel tank baffle foam in behind the stock cam cover baffle plate.  It still feels really wrong shoving foam inside the engine but apparently its fine based on it pretty much being the MINES/Hi-Octane RB26 cam baffle kit and the few posts here I have found of people doing it and the lack of posts saying the foam broke down and ruined the motor... Still plan to check it frequently though lol The last step for this round of oil control modifications I plan to make is to add some -12AN fittings to the cam covers and connect them to some (already existing luckily) -12AN fittings on the sump. Basically a sudo head drain/sump breather/pressure equaliser without having to remove the motor and do the one on the rear of the head. My plan is to add them to either the tops or the sides of the cam covers at the back. unless there is a compelling reason to have them at the front on the sides which i have seen a few times though they were all on RB26 cam covers from memory so that may be due to the stock breathers being on the back and the integral baffle being different ?    
×
×
  • Create New...