Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I'm looking into buying a stagea, but can't decide on series1 or series2. Apart from the cosmetic changes (not important), the only major difference is the Tiptronic shift, and the S2 has the RB25 Neo engine.

Are there any benefits to the Neo engine??? Apart from factory outputs are rated a 206kw. but thats like all japanese cars so.

Can somebody give me any ideas???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/139849-rb25-tekkies-look-here/
Share on other sites

Neo has upgraded brakes, too

Neo engine is an update model, etc etc, and the turbocharger exhaust housing is slightly larger too.

When I got my series 1, prices for the series 2 were at a minimum 8grand more. I used that 8k for mods to my series 1 Dayz bodykit 1997 Stagea - definately the right choice for me at the time.

good luck with it

Brendan

They have VVT right through the rev range, gtr conrods, use less fuel, have about 60 nm more torque than the older rb25's. Which counts for jack if you mod it but makes it a much nicer car if stock.

My r34 is stock and that extra big dollop of torque down low really helps when just putting around.

I've got a s2, basically because I just wanted the best I could get at the time. The price difference was still quite considerable between s1 and s2.

If you're just after performance and value for money then the s1 is your best option. For the same price as a good s2 you could have a s1 plus enough mods to make it look, sound, and go better than a s2.

My reasons for choosing a series 2 were:

- Looks (actually I like both)

- extra ~20kw

- better fuel economy

- infinitely variable valve timing (i think the earlier rb25 is like on-off)

- direct injection (is this true?)

- newer, so likely less km's

- tiptronic auto

- bigger brakes

I think in the end its personal preference - and the reason I say that is because if you want value for money then get a series 1 - but if you really prefer the series 2 then there's your answer. :)

Wasnt there a difference in turbo internals? one had a steel wheel, the other ceramic, bearing differences maybe? think i heard that somewhere...

TIPTRONIC AUTO!!! Bigger brakes would be good too... what car are Stagea brakes off? they look like silvia brakes, to be honest...

I am doing a Neo6 turbo converion on my RWD stagea. Basically the neo6 engine has a different exhaust cam and exhaust cam sensor. Plus being as it is a later model engine the neo6 has got direct injection (and i am pretty sure it has top mounted injectors not side mounted 1's, it could be the other way around). Although i thought they still had 370cc injectors.

Wouldn't be direct injection, AFAIK... Might be a different fuel rail with the different injectors you mentioned, but that's different to direct injection.

Direct injection is what deisels use, where the fuel is fired directly into the cylinder, not into the manifold ports. Direct injection is only now becoming more common on petrol-powered cars...

Quick clarifications;

1. The RB25 Neo turbo has a slightly larger turbine cover, otherwise the same as RB25 (non Neo) S2. That means ceramic turbine and plastic compressor.

2. Neo has solid followers, RB25 has hydraulic

3. Neo passes 1996 emissions, RB25 passes 1993 emissions

4. Neo has SLIGHTLY stronger conrods

5. Neo has larger intercooler (still side mount, but thicker and taller)

6. Neo has plastic top feed injectors (not the same as RB26 top feed though), RB25 has side feed

7. Neo has infinitely variable inlet camshaft timing, RB25 has simple on/off. Neither have variable exhaust camshaft timing.

8. Neo has higher flowing cat standard, but most get changed for compliance, so it doesn’t matter

9. Neo ECU is “smarter”, so harder to trick with piggy blacks (SAFC, DFA or equivalent). Has a much more aggressive R&R mapping, so you need to be a bit more careful with tuning.

10. The NEO CAS has more outputs for increased timing signal accuracy to the ECU (lower emissions and higher power output).

11. The drive peg on the NEO CAS to camshaft interface is different, so you can’t use non NEO CAS or non Neo exhaust camshaft

12. NEO ECU has different ECU plugs and pin outs, so you can’t use an RB25 Power FC, you need the right model PFC.

That’s about all I can think of.

:mad: cheers :D

Quick clarifications;

1. The RB25 Neo turbo has a slightly larger turbine cover, otherwise the same as RB25 (non Neo) S2. That means ceramic turbine and plastic compressor.

2. Neo has solid followers, RB25 has hydraulic

3. Neo passes 1996 emissions, RB25 passes 1993 emissions

4. Neo has SLIGHTLY stronger conrods

5. Neo has larger intercooler (still side mount, but thicker and taller)

6. Neo has plastic top feed injectors (not the same as RB26 top feed though), RB25 has side feed

7. Neo has infinitely variable inlet camshaft timing, RB25 has simple on/off. Neither have variable exhaust camshaft timing.

8. Neo has higher flowing cat standard, but most get changed for compliance, so it doesn’t matter

9. Neo ECU is “smarter”, so harder to trick with piggy blacks (SAFC, DFA or equivalent). Has a much more aggressive R&R mapping, so you need to be a bit more careful with tuning.

10. The NEO CAS has more outputs for increased timing signal accuracy to the ECU (lower emissions and higher power output).

11. The drive peg on the NEO CAS to camshaft interface is different, so you can’t use non NEO CAS or non Neo exhaust camshaft

12. NEO ECU has different ECU plugs and pin outs, so you can’t use an RB25 Power FC, you need the right model PFC.

That’s about all I can think of.

:mad: cheers :D

Fark thats all. lol. Cheers mate that is heaps helpfull. Much appreciated.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pete knows these cars well, he does my car too, if he was concerned about the traction arm length for your use he would have said so. Do you have adjustable bushes in that arm, maybe he got enough adjustment there (or maybe the bump steer was not material for your use of the car)
    • Hmm. Yes. I should have been clearer. 1000s for Haltech, for extra headroom. 725s for Nistune. You might even be OK with 640s, but if the possible power ends up much more than 300 rwkW you will run out of headroom on the 640s. That would probably be OK and a signal to not push it to that sort of power with Nistune anyway. At that level you probably do want to be thinking about engine protection functions. Oh, and all of that presumes 98 only, not E85. Well....the 1000s would allow you to run E85 at ~300rwkW territory, again, maybe sort of running out of headroom. Hard to tell with E85 - depends on the tuner as to how rich they like to set it up.
    • Yes.  The only scenario I can imagine when the answer isn't yes, is if you drive like there is highway patrol behind you at all times.  If your car currently runs, enjoy it and keep saving. Better costs more, keep saving until you can budget the better ECU. It's worth it.  Nope. Plenty of us making >300kw on unopened motors. Mine is unopened and makes about 350kw if I turn everything up, its fine (lots of caveats here, how the car will be used/abused, how long you expect the engine to last between rebuilds, how has the engine been maintained prior to coming into your ownership, etc etc).   
    • Sorry just wanting to clarify, at this power goal, which should I be going? Also, More info regarding suspension, the rear upper camber arms were used to get the camber back to i believe around -0.5 ~ -1 degree (@ Road and Race in Rydalmere), I forgot the exact figure, but ALOT less camber than what it came originally which was like -2.5degrees. Are the traction arms still recommended? The bilsteins from SydneyKid, they've got 400lb/in fronts & 275/in in the rear, revalved to his specs. Intercooler, I'm just having a look at some on Rakuten.jp and some other japanese sites. Might get something from back there, GReddy, Blitz or HPI, all crossflow. Looking at roughly $450-$500 AUD + shipping... Theres not many choices except that chinese branded Justjap unless you go for blitz return flow. Yeah, only downside with Haltech is the price ahhaha, so expensive, and with all the sensors if I go that route... $$$$$ yeesh. Are headstuds/gaskets needed for <300akw?
×
×
  • Create New...